Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57FED9976 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78029 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2011 15:28:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 77984 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2011 15:28:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 77976 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2011 15:28:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:28:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sylvain@datastax.com designates 209.85.160.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.172] (HELO mail-gy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.160.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:27:58 +0000 Received: by ghrr14 with SMTP id r14so845860ghr.31 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:27:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.174.3 with SMTP id w3mr5527542yhl.117.1321630058157; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:27:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.103.13 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:27:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sylvain Lebresne Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:27:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.3 (take 2) To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Including my own vote, I'm counting 4 binding +1's and no -1's. The vote passes. I'll publish the artifacts shortly. -- Sylvain On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: >> Unless someone object strongly I'm probably going to be lazy and not rebuild the >> artifacts to reflect the correct api. My own "justification" for my >> laziness is that I >> don't want to get into the habit of releasing artifacts that have not >> been voted on >> (I know I'm awesome but I still make errors sometimes). Besides, 1.0.2 already >> has the "wrong" version so "fixing" it now or with 1.0.4 don't seem to make much >> of a difference to me. This would also be time consuming for me :) >> (would require >> a specific svn branch and whatnot). > > +1 > > -Brandon >