incubator-cassandra-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Evans <eev...@acunu.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.5
Date Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:10:15 GMT
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:06 AM, declan <declan@bluelinkmarketing.com> wrote:
> PLEASE take me off this email distribution list....thanks

http://threepanelsoul.com/2008/12/02/on-sea-lions/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jake Luciani [mailto:jakers@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:00 AM
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.5
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Eric Evans <eevans@acunu.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylvain@datastax.com>
>> wrote:
>> > So 1.0.4 was actually pretty catastrophic. CASSANDRA-3540 is a clear
>> blocker
>> > and CASSANDRA-3539 is critical too. For now, we've pulled the plug on
>> 1.0.4 by
>> > removing it from the website (and I broke the debian upgrade to 1.0.4),
>> but we
>> > need a fix asap.
>> >
>> > I've taken the 1.0.4 artifacts and on top of that I've:
>> >  - reverted CASSANDRA-3407 (to 'fix' CASSANDRA-3540)
>> >  - committed CASSANDRA-3539
>> > I thus propose the following artifacts for release as 1.0.5.
>> >
>> > SVN:
>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-1.0.5@1208016
>> > Artifacts:
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-269/or
> g/apache/cassandra/apache-cassandra/1.0.5/
>> > Staging repository:
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-269/
>> >
>> > The artifacts as well as the debian package are also available here:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~slebresne/
>> >
>> > Given the situation, and given that the proposed artifacts differs only
>> > slightly from the one of 1.0.4, I propose an expedited vote of 24 hours
>> > (longer if needed).
>>
>> I don't think it's anything new, but in addition to the previously
>> discussed ConsistencyLevelTest, I get the occasional failure of
>> CompactionsTest due to a timeout.  It is pretty long running, maybe we
>> just need to extend the timeout.
>>
>> Other than that, +1
>>
>> --
>> Eric Evans
>> Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://twitter.com/tjake
>
>



-- 
Eric Evans
Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu

Mime
View raw message