Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40D526D64 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42760 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:39:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 42730 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:39:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 42722 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 16:39:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:39:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.192.241.151] (HELO smtp151.dfw.emailsrvr.com) (67.192.241.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:39:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp15.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9AAB5300826 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:39:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp15.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: eevans-AT-racklabs.com) with ESMTPSA id 7A463300160 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:39:11 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Cassandra 1.0 From: Eric Evans To: dev@cassandra.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:39:12 -0500 Message-ID: <1308242352.12941.37.camel@erebus.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 09:15 -0700, Ryan King wrote: > I think maybe 4 months was too short? Do we optimistically want to try > that again or plan on taking a bit more time? I think 4 months is about the right amount of time. Also, our upgrade story is better than it has ever been, which changes things here considerably. > Either way I'm happy to have a plan. :) Yup. -- Eric Evans eevans@rackspace.com