Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41561 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2010 21:15:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Sep 2010 21:15:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 80952 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2010 21:15:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 80847 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2010 21:15:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 80838 invoked by uid 99); 23 Sep 2010 21:15:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:15:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jbellis@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.179] (HELO mail-qy0-f179.google.com) (209.85.216.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:15:26 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so1241893qyk.10 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:15:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AK/j+LIvGdrlrGCjSPZP5Vrlr6tYCzaLIxPCmhOo57k=; b=TTFJK1lxH20YcWtxx79VZdSVLejeBuC6uCmBzvMPik8ao5WiASni+Dp+7Kx1P0ufbk A/useBM1gmz5wggZtTq6wxES3hOOUivgqIc6pcz24IzteTAaa2VuSt9RVeylF7lpCy3j PTB0tfk7hwsrkEFevL3KvZCfPhXrJIezqe6Tk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gajIllL5ooe318hA9JikjWjMetCFozsNcVSiB1f6lS5GZOBeiiy/lLK6A9s3sCizcq ZeXrf9rvw9VJYVXf6DtKaylqu4jXjHc6UbUj6g0Et9F1o8ivQWgd3aZ4LSaaPezxAHHp 5k47Q1Tb72HrENYDSuhgGPwoVfQOhAxRNhYLc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.228.15 with SMTP id jc15mr1865360qcb.31.1285276505084; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.191.6 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:15:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:15:04 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: composite indexes? From: Jonathan Ellis To: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Can you start with the problem you are trying to solve, before we decide if composite indexes is the right solution? :) On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Colin Taylor wrote: > Is this on the roadmap? I guess I cant see why it wouldnt be and we > would be happy to supply patches if they were to be accepted, just > puzzled by the seeming lack of interest. > > cheers > Colin > -- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support http://riptano.com