Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of miguelitovert@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.83.66 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=tJ5zNX/jHhfA2RGb3kiDtwbV5cW6COJ37RNHO0UJ/GiiCzUg60mQ2RRuX2NmkBxC9X
         D1CvKEmSEmTwgkXbC7gCspbyIkzRWn4c9Hj3rd3XTyIQGCjgqrd9YCm/Wl4o9oUTKwWX
         upcBJ5F04Lkg1zGL5Jh3kMzNmgu2CvqX1InO0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <p2v998903461004131237w9f3d79a5sf80c871dbab4943f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <q2qd84914941004090755p3eb86350meee61a1dcffa3efa@mail.gmail.com>
	 <286836083-1271179762-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1158258022-@bda619.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
	 <r2md84914941004131033q150fc33dx73813701d653911a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1635993873-1271181923-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-125116706-@bda619.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
	 <t2yd84914941004131109l11634ca1o43e389e8ca334d76@mail.gmail.com>
	 <r2vcdc5ad201004131113x76f5f7edga05683cf6685cb0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <q2rd84914941004131115y127b3429ibf47d9f508cd53a8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <572443DC-3151-4C40-9FB9-6A2BFCE3B477@gmail.com>
	 <p2v998903461004131237w9f3d79a5sf80c871dbab4943f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:47:57 -0500
Message-ID: <p2vda04fdf51004131247p190cd887kf969f1810ca86f7a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: python web framework suggestions (for Cassandra Web UI) needed
From: Miguel Verde <miguelitovert@gmail.com>
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd71a98cfad5e04842389f4

--000e0cd71a98cfad5e04842389f4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

-1 vote for Tornado.  As far as I know, it still doesn't run on Windows and
has had only 2 releases.  I don't think it makes sense to push that as a
dependency to potential deployers of this UI.

There are many alternatives with broader platform support and more
consistent mainline releases: Bottle, CherryPy, Django, Paste/Pylons,
Werkzeug
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Paul Bohm <bohmps@gmail.com> wrote:

> tornado +1 - it's lightweight and has few external dependencies.
>
> Pylons +4
> Tornado +3
> Django +1
> Undetermined +2
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Ray Slakinski <ray.slakinski@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I'll put in a vote for django, you can use managers to handle a lot of
> the object code.
> >
> > Ray Slakinski
> >
> > On 2010-04-13, at 2:15 PM, Pablo Cuadrado wrote:
> >
> >> Pylons +4
> >> Tornado +2
> >> Django +1
> >> Undetermined +2
> >>
> >> Do I smell Pylons? :)
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Brandon Williams <driftx@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Pablo Cuadrado <
> pablocuadrado@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Well, so far we are:
> >>>>
> >>>> Pylons +3
> >>>> Tornado +2
> >>>> Django +1
> >>>> Undetermined +2
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> +1 for pylons.  I think a more popular framework is likely to have
> better
> >>> chances of being maintained and avoiding bitrot in the long haul.
> >>>
> >>> -Brandon
> >>>
> >
> >
>

--000e0cd71a98cfad5e04842389f4--