Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52755 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 13:49:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 13:49:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 23307 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 13:49:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 23225 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 13:49:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 23217 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 13:49:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:49:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.44] (HELO mail-gw0-f44.google.com) (74.125.83.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:49:29 +0000 Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so66698gwb.31 for ; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 06:49:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qjVLQfoDxK/kUx2AnlC/9BEOpnClpdFT7DPYtgGowV4=; b=bIwC924wdzq2PK0YkX7PRwr5rrmiGaEp5mYuug2Kb5T9RvWw5umRVAKHmGeZ8Hmx1U 2tujyiOyb/4Qa+LJfL4t3SLvfOg1TNKDMQrH7TSWx5txLqtIJO0AwxviXW07UREuZKzQ J8x9ui+SdRQXvInmt/8f9eTZ9cJYkCbPfjfBk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nk1GAmAhuE7Mee6qZx2PDCxqVVsMrbl21K+Bd9E568Tw4GwW8634AWM5doX2KkmSIF 8ImlSkkDV65iUOFqERsqUYIH3uka9UYQy1CLJo5kGkhYSJJ8K7wyTYsPibEnvfRv1MPL rlCIeM2DupyC7aAyf44Ku77HX9xtoLb4XbZQQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.89.6 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 06:49:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 08:49:08 -0500 Received: by 10.91.192.5 with SMTP id u5mr95433agp.15.1270820948461; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 06:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Thoughts on issue 697 (Mitigate unpublished dependencies when using Cassandra with Maven) From: Jesse McConnell To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Cc: gdusbabek@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I agree with Gary's comments even though I am certainly on the pro-maven side of the issue.. if someone cares enough about it, it will get done if I was using cassandra via a maven build I would have already contributed the time to get the maven aspects of this in place, its not a tremendous amount of work...but I am working in ant lands for the time being so it hasn't been much of a priority its all volunteer effort (or corporate sponsored effort, whatever the case may be) so if someone cares enough about doing it, they'll do it. From what I have seen the dev's are not particularly motivated to support maven better so they haven't, that is their prerogative. They have done more then some projects in saying they are not adverse to having it done if someone else does it..:) cheers, jesse -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 08:40, Ryan Daum wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote: > >> >> >> I disagree that every project should do things the mvn way for the >> sake of making things easier for mvn users. > > > I'm sorry, do you not see the hypocrisy of saying this while referring to a > project that retrieves its transitive dependencies from Maven repositories? > > Ryan >