Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88552 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2009 23:23:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2009 23:23:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 84942 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 23:23:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84904 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 23:23:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cassandra-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84893 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2009 23:23:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:23:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.192.241.111] (HELO smtp111.dfw.emailsrvr.com) (67.192.241.111) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:23:27 +0000 Received: from relay1.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay1.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 06F76127837F for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:23:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by relay1.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: eevans-AT-racklabs.com) with ESMTPSA id CEC8E1278363 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:23:05 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Graduation? From: Eric Evans To: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: <4239a4320911031123m7888d9bt5781a32d6eaea18a@mail.gmail.com> <71e1b5740911051329r5e6f5079p896779d81df0b50f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:23:08 -0600 Message-ID: <1257463388.16247.375.camel@achilles> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 17:04 -0600, Michael Greene wrote: > It was previously proposed that documentation be CTR. I would be in > favor of this, and extending it to include scripts, licensing, and > other project management materials. I would be in favor of relaxing the RTC "requirement" to be more of an "understanding", and letting common sense prevail (for as long as that doesn't prove to be a problem anyway :)). Because yes, there is a big difference between wanting to have another set of eyes on a huge re-factoring of a critical subsystem, and correcting spelling errors in a README. -- Eric Evans eevans@rackspace.com