incubator-cassandra-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ant elder <antel...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Date Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:53:06 GMT
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM, sebb<sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb<sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <eevans@rackspace.com> wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >>  The vote is now closed with the following results:
>>  >>
>>  >>   * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>>  >>   * 0 votes: 0
>>  >>   * -1 votes: 0
>>  >>
>>  >>  The vote passes.
>>  >
>>  > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
>>  > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
>>  > the LICENSE file.
>>  >
>>  > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
>>  > libraries, apart from Groovy.
>>  >
>>
>>
>> Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
>>  done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
>>  need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
>>  license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
>>  party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
>>  the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
>
> No, it doesn't exactly say that.
> The way I read it currently, the BSD notice needs to go into the
> NOTICE or LICENSE file, not a license file.
> Besides, the JIRA is still open.
>
> Also not resolved is the fact that the main LICENSE file neither
> includes nor has pointers to the other licenses.
>

It looks like this vote is done so i'll start a new thread on general@
about this.

   ...ant

Mime
View raw message