incubator-cassandra-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anthony Molinaro <antho...@alumni.caltech.edu>
Subject Re: Cassandra version number policy
Date Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:01:31 GMT
Right, I see you say 0.4.0 will be along soon after so people shouldn't
use 0.3.0 for anything serious, so I guess the question is how soon is soon
after?

-Anthony

On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 12:23:36AM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> see the thread about the future of 0.3
> 
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Anthony
> Molinaro<anthonym@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:28:39PM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> >> > A somewhat related question, I'm using an svn external to keep a tree
> >> > in my svn project which builds rpms and maven packages.  I currently have
> >> > that tree pointed at the HEAD, but that seems risky because its a moving
> >> > target.  I'd like to point at the 0.3.0 release.  Does the cassandra-0.3.0-rc3
> >> > tag represent that release?  (ie, if I were to download the tarball and
> >> > checkout that tag would the code be equivalent)
> >>
> >> Yes, the rc3 tag is what will be released as -final, modulo some yak
> >> shaving (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200907.mbox/%3C71e1b5740907020449m3f48cbd8o1b3f9c03ba6c144c@mail.gmail.com%3E).
> >>  The code will be the same.
> >
> > Oh, I just noticed 0.3 does not include the nodeprobe script, would that be
> > hard to backport?  I really like the idea of not having to poke holes to get
> > at the web server on my cassandra nodes.
> >
> > -Anthony
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Anthony Molinaro                           <anthonym@alumni.caltech.edu>
> >

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony Molinaro                           <anthonym@alumni.caltech.edu>

Mime
View raw message