incubator-cassandra-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sandeep Tata <sandeep.t...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.3 and the OOM gremlin (CASSANDRA-208)
Date Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:53:46 GMT
Won't things like multi-table support break binary compatibility anyway?

We might be stuck with having to write a tool that migrates from a 0.3
format to a 0.4 format.


On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbellis@gmail.com> wrote:
> The fix for 208 [1] is fairly invasive.  should we
>
> (a) release another RC and do more testing before 0.3 final, or
> (b) release 0.3 without these changes, and only add this fix to trunk?
>
> Although I see the 0.3 release primarily as a means to let people
> start playing with the cassandra data model, I don't know that I want
> to release it knowing that 0.4 is going to be binary-incompatible with
> the 0.3 data files.  So I'd be inclined towards (a).
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-208
>
> -Jonathan
>

Mime
View raw message