Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fil@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.35 as permitted sender)
From: Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
To: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org" <callback-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:50:58 -0700
Subject: Re: cordova/debug vs. cordova/emulate
Thread-Topic: cordova/debug vs. cordova/emulate
Thread-Index: Ac2swkVRaFn3YXDMRL2gghsmPKijog==
Message-ID: <CCA49256.FE70%fil@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANpVHHx6Q1XvB=umiyCkFCwmCZXv6SqxZTt_Pr+d1E+ouQBeZw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Totally in favor of these changes!

How would we go about documenting these changes? Just drop them in for
2.3? Blog post? Thoughts?

On 10/17/12 3:14 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Andrew Grieve
><agrieve@chromium.org>wrote:
>
>> I don't think we should change them for 2.2, and instead take some time
>>for
>> 2.3 to get them exactly how we want them, and consist across platforms.
>>
>
>Agreed
>
>
>>
>> I think keeping the existing scrips as-is for a deprecation period would
>> cause more confusion than good.
>
>
>I believe we can show a warning message during the deprecation period so
>that people can get used to the new commands.
>
>I created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1670
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.kadri@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, I think so.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dully noted for the cli :)
>> > >
>> > > I'll have the cli reflect the command changes as well.
>> > >
>> > > Should there be any level of "deprecation" for this? I.e. Keep the
>>old
>> > > scripts around for 2.2 and then remove/rename as necessary
>>completely
>> for
>> > > 2.3?
>> > >
>> > > On 10/16/12 11:39 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >ya 2.3 for sure --- I imagine this will bust up cordova-cli a
>>little
>> > > >
>> > > >On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Anis KADRI <anis.kadri@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> Yes I like that much better. Should we target those changes for
>>2.2
>> or
>> > > >>2.3
>> > > >> ? I am thinking 2.3. It will give us sometime to update the docs
>> etc=A9
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
>>wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> > ./cordova/BOOM is what you want. Why is it called like that
>>and
>> why
>> > > >>>there
>> > > >>> > is no such thing on iOS ? I don't know=A9
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Heh. I did that as a joke for my 'Steve Jobs' demo. BOOM there's
>> your
>> > > >>>app.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> > I am not a fan of "debug" to run on a device though. Can there
>> be a
>> > > >>> better
>> > > >>> > word ?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> cordova/deploy?
>> > > >>>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>