Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6973DD710 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51526 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2012 21:21:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51498 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2012 21:21:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51488 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2012 21:21:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:21:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.177] (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:21:26 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hj13so2001427wib.0 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:21:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=YvxOcZz7Fy0/lFl8Y3diMN3+vSuIsXxUtQFaLtqN+l0=; b=MpiYWLDlVtPgz30lZl4vp9EMVSuOnPpkUjwrz3jsJ5746tEwP1u6y7500CC+HVr5jx FSYjb95I+B43jL3+IMSr+Zt7Wnp5jv6ZqY9E5X/vckP3hSRSz4Ar5iWk50iXfBhhH0HT 1mZwR/uOSEkEJy9EB2gpkpdfSlOfvMxtnS6VZ1e0Nf3V7AFtLzhwDzmyIQXnRsoch/BT HgzkGZa8xckGcjVaGpMuToOYi4xBhIkxJl9awOS6qcUHgkgaEM1svFjUHtt/8SNPxqsG FenYIsubxoCsXD4BvG6Od/sTs1Tk0Gc9Wcsk9LHRyV1iSxidIiCqrsrk6wevFisOomrh 0HtQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.213.159 with SMTP id a31mr7419897wep.11.1350336064764; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:21:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.181.74 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:21:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:21:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: point release? From: Joe Bowser To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Android updated to 2.2.0rc1 (cordova-js, cordova-hello-world). Mobile-spec passes the majority of tests. On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Shazron wrote: > iOS updated to 2.2.0rc1 (cordova-js, cordova-hello-world). Mobile-spec > passes all tests. > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Shazron wrote: >> 1502 fixed, and updated the version but forgot to add rc1 to the end, >> oops. I will re-do that once the js and cordova-app bits are >> tagged/updated and re-test. So far with the interim js all mobile-spec >> tests are passing. >> >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Shazron wrote: >>> iOS these have been fixed: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600 >>> >>> I'm fixing this one: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502 >>> >>> This one will be left, don't know if we can fix it: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603 >>> >>> I will be updating the version numbers, template etc as well. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Grieve wrote: >>>> On the Android side: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1606 (updating core plugins to >>>> extend CordovaPlugin instead of Plugin) >>>> >>>> Update iOS list with already fixed ones gone: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603 >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604 >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502 >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Becky Gibson wrote: >>>> >>>>> And 1563 is a dup of 902. >>>>> I'm confused about what the problem is with 1604 (I posted a comment) >>>>> And think that the following are also important: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502 - We need and updated image >>>>> - does Adobe have a designer to work on that? >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Michal Mocny wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Andrew Grieve >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > Bugs that I'd like to see fixed before the RC: >>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603 >>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604 >>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1570 >>>>> > >>>>> > 1570 is already marked closed? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1563 >>>>> > > >>>>> > > We should be able to fix these over the next couple of days though. >>>>> Want >>>>> > to >>>>> > > aim for cutting the RC Thursday? >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > Agree that tagging 2.2.0rc1 is the right thing to do at this point. >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Becky Gibson >>>> > >>>>> > > > wrote: >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > > I think we have a pretty good handle on the iOS 6 bugs. Most of >>>>> the >>>>> > > ones >>>>> > > > > reported recently have already been fixed and committed. I would >>>>> > push >>>>> > > > for >>>>> > > > > a release candidate this week so we can start focusing on testing >>>>> and >>>>> > > bug >>>>> > > > > fixes rather than continue to add more features and optimizations. >>>>> > I >>>>> > > > > think once we have a release candidate we will get more feedback >>>>> from >>>>> > > > users >>>>> > > > > who are not comfortable taking an edge build. This will get us more >>>>> > > real >>>>> > > > > world iOS 6 testing. >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > -becky >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Giorgio Natili < >>>>> > g.natili@gnstudio.com >>>>> > > > > >wrote: >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > Because has been said that some (or most) iOS 6 issues will be >>>>> not >>>>> > > part >>>>> > > > > of >>>>> > > > > > it... >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > On 10/8/12 9:03 AM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >Why do you feel that this release wouldn't be a stable release? >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Giorgio Natili < >>>>> > > > g.natili@gnstudio.com> >>>>> > > > > > >wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> Just my 2 cents but you don't think is better to wait 2 weeks >>>>> > more >>>>> > > > and >>>>> > > > > > >> have a pretty stable one? >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> Giorgio >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> On 10/3/12 7:56 PM, "Simon MacDonald" < >>>>> > simon.macdonald@gmail.com> >>>>> > > > > > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>I think we are looking good for 2.2.0 on Android. It will >>>>> mostly >>>>> > > be >>>>> > > > a >>>>> > > > > > >>>bug fix/performance release for us. I suspect we'll need until >>>>> > > 2.3.0 >>>>> > > > > > >>>to get all the Camera code sorted. >>>>> > > > > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>Simon Mac Donald >>>>> > > > > > >>>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >>>>> > > > > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bryce Curtis < >>>>> > > > curtis.bryce@gmail.com> >>>>> > > > > > >>>wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>> It sounds like resolving iOS6 issues will drive when 2.2.0 >>>>> can >>>>> > > be >>>>> > > > > > >>>> tagged. What is the readiness of the other platforms so we >>>>> > can >>>>> > > > > have a >>>>> > > > > > >>>> 2.2 release when iOS is ready? Does it sound reasonable to >>>>> > have >>>>> > > a >>>>> > > > > > >>>> release candidate in a week or so, then give a couple of >>>>> weeks >>>>> > > of >>>>> > > > > > >>>> testing before tagging 2.2? >>>>> > > > > > >>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Filip Maj >>>>> > > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> If you folks see benefit for the iOS implementation, then >>>>> I'm >>>>> > > for >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>waiting. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On 10/2/12 8:48 AM, "Andrew Grieve" >>>>> > > > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>I was thinking the same thing. We still have new >>>>> iOS6-related >>>>> > > > bugs >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>being >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>reported, so it might make sense to give this more time. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Becky Gibson >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> So, where do we stand on this? I think working towards >>>>> 2.2 >>>>> > > > > sooner >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>rather >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> than later would be the best solution since there appear >>>>> to >>>>> > > be >>>>> > > > > many >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>issues >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> with cutting a point release. Where do the other >>>>> platforms >>>>> > > > stand >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrt >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2? >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> What more needs to be done? >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> -becky >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Michal Mocny < >>>>> > > > > mmocny@chromium.org >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > Nevermind, I'm not able to repro the report. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Michal Mocny >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > someone just reported an issue with FileWriter on >>>>> ios6 >>>>> > ( >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1559) >>>>> similar >>>>> > > to >>>>> > > > a >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>FileReader >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > issue I fixed a few weeks back. Fix is likely easy, >>>>> > just >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>taking >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>a >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>look >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > right now to confirm and see if any other things need >>>>> > > > fixing. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>Should >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> be >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > solved today. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Grieve >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> The main fixes we'll need are: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console >>>>> methods >>>>> > > to >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>original >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console >>>>> methods >>>>> > > to >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>original >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Change default bridge >>>>> > > from >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> XHR_NO_PAYLOAD >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> to... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Attempt to fix a >>>>> crash >>>>> > in >>>>> > > > iOS >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>XHR >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> bridge >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> mode. commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Fix XHR exec bridge >>>>> not >>>>> > > > > working >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> non-file... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapsho >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> However, there were also extra params added to >>>>> > > > FileTransfer >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>that >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>will >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > also >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need to be included to avoid a JS/Native mismatch. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> There looks to be some Globalization plugin JS >>>>> commits >>>>> > > as >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>well, >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>but I >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> haven't followed whether those will cause issues if >>>>> > left >>>>> > > > > out. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Brooks < >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > michael@michaelbrooks.ca >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > When we decide to roll 2.1.1, we should use JIRA >>>>> to >>>>> > > > track >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>the >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> release. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > Unfortunately, that means JIRA spam... >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Filip Maj < >>>>> > > > fil@adobe.com >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > iOS folks: are there any commits needed newer >>>>> than >>>>> > > the >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> in >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> the >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > JS >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > for any critical fixes? >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > On 9/27/12 3:40 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen" >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Just iOS afaik >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Cheers, >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > Jesse >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Sent from my iPhone6 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >On 2012-09-27, at 3:36 PM, Filip Maj < >>>>> > > fil@adobe.com> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> So which platforms are we fixing horrible >>>>> bugs >>>>> > > for >>>>> > > > in >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.1? >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> WP7 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > + >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > iOS? >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> Basically: do any of the failing platforms >>>>> that >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>_require_ >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>fixes >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > any >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> JS fixes? >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> On 9/27/12 3:32 PM, "Jesse" < >>>>> > > > purplecabbage@gmail.com >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> Where / When are we tagging cordova-js ? >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Jesse >>>>> > MacFadyen >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Not disagreeing. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Cheers, >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Jesse >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> On 2012-09-27, at 2:31 AM, Brian LeRoux < >>>>> > > > > b@brian.io> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> One click builds are not just for CI! Hand >>>>> > > > rolling >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>always >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > error >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>prone, >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> and >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> time consuming repatative business like >>>>> that >>>>> > > is >>>>> > > > a >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>job >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for a >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> robot. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>You >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> then >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> can focus on code, and others can see (and >>>>> > > > > therefor >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>improve >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> upon) >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> release >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> packaging. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> Regardless of all those benefits we want >>>>> to >>>>> > > get >>>>> > > > > to a >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>CI >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > future. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> (recommended reading on this, and more: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> >>>>> > http://pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer) >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012, Jesse >>>>> > > MacFadyen >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> I agree in a continuous integration >>>>> > scenario >>>>> > > > that >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>makes >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > sense, >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> but >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>we >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> are not there yet, and probably not soon >>>>> > > > either. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Jesse >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:46 PM, Brian LeRoux >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Ya lets not ship a release with >>>>> different >>>>> > > ver >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>numbers >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> inside >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>bundled. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> That's askin for (more) issue tracking >>>>> > > hell. A >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>release >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > is >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > just >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>a >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> one >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> liner / automated. If it isn't: it >>>>> should >>>>> > > be. >>>>> > > > :p >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Filip >>>>> > Maj >>>>> > > > > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> Link fail! >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1531 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 12:22 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen" >>>>> < >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> purplecabbage@gmail.com >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Address which for windows phone? >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Jesse >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:01 PM, Filip Maj >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> O ya and we should possibly address >>>>> > this >>>>> > > > for >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>windows >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > phone >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 7 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>2.1.1 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jesse are there any instructions >>>>> > anywhere >>>>> > > > on >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>how >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>to >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>put >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > together >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> those >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> starter packages? >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse >>>>> MacFadyen" >>>>> > < >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > purplecabbage@gmail.com >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think we should allow some >>>>> latitude >>>>> > in >>>>> > > > the >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>point >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> releases >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > to >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> avoid >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the cascade of meaningless tags, and >>>>> > > extra >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>work. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Can we release 2.1.1 and just say >>>>> that >>>>> > > it >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>contains >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> 2.1.1 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>iOS >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.0 for the rest? There are no API >>>>> > > > changes >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>right? >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jesse >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 9:54 AM, Michael >>>>> > > Brooks >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As Becky mentioned, there's some >>>>> big >>>>> > > > issues >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>iOS >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> and >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> our >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> user's >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> really like to see a quick patch. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be in favour of tagging 2.1.1, >>>>> > > where >>>>> > > > > iOS >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tags >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > master >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> and >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> every >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> other >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> platform tags 2.1.1 on the same >>>>> > commit >>>>> > > as >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:59 AM, >>>>> > Brian >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>LeRoux < >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> b@brian.io> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather we point 2.1.1 at the >>>>> 2.1 >>>>> > > tag >>>>> > > > > as >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> suggested >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Android, >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> continue work on 2.2 as planned, >>>>> and >>>>> > > > ship >>>>> > > > > a >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>fresh >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> release >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > for >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein the big showstopper type >>>>> > > > problems >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>exist. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:48 PM, >>>>> Joe >>>>> > > > > Bowser >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should just start >>>>> > cutting >>>>> > > a >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2.0 >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> release. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > This >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> log >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks too big for a point release >>>>> > and >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>there's >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> enough >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> to >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merit >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That being said, Cordova 2.1.0 >>>>> > still >>>>> > > > > isn't >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> officially >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> out, >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> complicates things. Any word on >>>>> > > that? >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 26, 2012 6:33 AM, "Andrew >>>>> > > > Grieve" >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another breakage that has been >>>>> > > coming >>>>> > > > > up a >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>lot >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>is >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > that >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > the >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> XHR >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't work on non file:/// >>>>> hosted >>>>> > > > > paged. >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>It's >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> fixed >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> now, >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> would >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> good >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get it out ther >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> -- >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> @purplecabbage >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> risingj.com >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>>