Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2185ADA32 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43887 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2012 22:08:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43862 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2012 22:08:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43854 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2012 22:08:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:08:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of khawkins@salesforce.com designates 64.18.3.98 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.3.98] (HELO exprod8og109.obsmtp.com) (64.18.3.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:07:56 +0000 Received: from exsfm-hub4.internal.salesforce.com ([204.14.239.239]) by exprod8ob109.postini.com ([64.18.7.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUIRyJwlVk1K/yrDHJM5+xG/iEuowsapF@postini.com; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:07:36 PDT Received: from EXSFM-MB03.internal.salesforce.com ([10.1.127.57]) by exsfm-hub4.internal.salesforce.com ([10.1.127.8]) with mapi; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:07:35 -0700 From: Kevin Hawkins To: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:07:35 -0700 Subject: Best practices for contributing near a release boundary Thread-Topic: Best practices for contributing near a release boundary Thread-Index: Ac2v2HmZDF6pqgkyQyeqDC9rYkoIoQ== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AB80F08003696A41825710BDB0FE7A91712105EEEXSFMMB03intern_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_AB80F08003696A41825710BDB0FE7A91712105EEEXSFMMB03intern_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I've got a couple of "Improvements" I'd like to contribute to the iOS side = of the Cordova project. However, I know we're super close to the 2.2 relea= se boundary, and I don't feel strongly that these changes would need to be = in 2.2-actually, I feel strongly that, process-wise, this is *not* the time= to commit feature updates in a release cycle, at least to the imminent rel= ease. So what's the best course of action here? Would it be better to attach git= patches to the Improvement items I create? Or some other approach? Thanks, Kevin --_000_AB80F08003696A41825710BDB0FE7A91712105EEEXSFMMB03intern_--