incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [Discuss] Nomination of VP for Cordova
Date Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:50:33 GMT
+1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP

On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:

>I agree!
>Or if you want a vote:
>+1 to Brian Leroux as VP
>
>Cheers,
>  Jesse
>
>Sent from my iPhone6
>
>On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one has
>>issues
>> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote and
>>moving
>> the graduation process forward.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald
>> <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean reward, of
>>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux.
>>>
>>> Simon Mac Donald
>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen
>>><purplecabbage@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus ones.
>>>> Suggestion:
>>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new +1 )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>  Jesse
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>>>
>>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks <
>>> michael@michaelbrooks.ca>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for Apache
>>>>>> Cordova's VP role.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has accepted
the
>>>> role.
>>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board and
the
>>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on how long
>>>>>>he
>>>>>> chooses to hold the position.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller <pmuellr@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting <
>>> jukka.zitting@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation, while
others
>>> keep
>>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign.
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See also
>>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair
>>>> .
>>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair (V.P.)
has
>>>>>>>>no
>>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member of the
PMC.
>>>>>>>>The
>>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly rotation
>>>>>>>thing -
>>>> so
>>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get tired
of
>>>>>>>it
>>> -
>>>> a
>>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role
>>>>>>>long-term
>>> as
>>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Patrick Mueller
>>>>>>> http://muellerware.org
>>>


Mime
View raw message