incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Brooks <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca>
Subject Re: [Discuss] Nomination of VP for Cordova
Date Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:05:37 GMT
+1 Brian LeRoux

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

> +1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP
>
> On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I agree!
> >Or if you want a vote:
> >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP
> >
> >Cheers,
> >  Jesse
> >
> >Sent from my iPhone6
> >
> >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one has
> >>issues
> >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote and
> >>moving
> >> the graduation process forward.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> -Steve
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald
> >> <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean reward, of
> >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux.
> >>>
> >>> Simon Mac Donald
> >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen
> >>><purplecabbage@gmail.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus ones.
> >>>> Suggestion:
> >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new +1 )
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>  Jesse
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone6
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks <
> >>> michael@michaelbrooks.ca>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for
Apache
> >>>>>> Cordova's VP role.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has accepted
the
> >>>> role.
> >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board
and the
> >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on how
long
> >>>>>>he
> >>>>>> chooses to hold the position.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Michael
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller <pmuellr@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting <
> >>> jukka.zitting@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation,
while others
> >>> keep
> >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign.
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> See also
> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair
> >>>> .
> >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair
(V.P.) has
> >>>>>>>>no
> >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member
of the PMC.
> >>>>>>>>The
> >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly rotation
> >>>>>>>thing -
> >>>> so
> >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get
tired of
> >>>>>>>it
> >>> -
> >>>> a
> >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role
> >>>>>>>long-term
> >>> as
> >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller
> >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org
> >>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message