incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: point release?
Date Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:21:04 GMT
Android updated to 2.2.0rc1 (cordova-js, cordova-hello-world).
Mobile-spec passes the majority of tests.

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> iOS updated to 2.2.0rc1 (cordova-js, cordova-hello-world). Mobile-spec
> passes all tests.
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 1502 fixed, and updated the version but forgot to add rc1 to the end,
>> oops. I will re-do that once the js and cordova-app bits are
>> tagged/updated and re-test. So far with the interim js all mobile-spec
>> tests are passing.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> iOS these have been fixed:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
>>>
>>> I'm fixing this one:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502
>>>
>>> This one will be left, don't know if we can fix it:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603
>>>
>>> I will be updating the version numbers, template etc as well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>> On the Android side:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1606 (updating core plugins to
>>>> extend CordovaPlugin instead of Plugin)
>>>>
>>>> Update iOS list with already fixed ones gone:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And 1563 is a dup of 902.
>>>>> I'm confused about what the problem is with 1604 (I posted a comment)
>>>>> And think that the following are also important:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502  - We need and updated image
>>>>> - does Adobe have a designer to work on that?
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > Bugs that I'd like to see fixed before the RC:
>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603
>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1570
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 1570 is already marked closed?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1563
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > We should be able to fix these over the next couple of days though.
>>>>> Want
>>>>> > to
>>>>> > > aim for cutting the RC Thursday?
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > Agree that tagging 2.2.0rc1 is the right thing to do at this point.
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > > I think we have a pretty good handle on the iOS 6 bugs.  Most of
>>>>> the
>>>>> > > ones
>>>>> > > > > reported recently have already been fixed and committed.  I would
>>>>> > push
>>>>> > > > for
>>>>> > > > > a release candidate this week so we can start focusing on testing
>>>>> and
>>>>> > > bug
>>>>> > > > > fixes rather than continue to add more features and optimizations.
>>>>> > I
>>>>> > > > > think once we have a release candidate we will get more feedback
>>>>> from
>>>>> > > > users
>>>>> > > > > who are not comfortable taking an edge build. This will get us more
>>>>> > > real
>>>>> > > > > world iOS 6 testing.
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > -becky
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Giorgio Natili <
>>>>> > g.natili@gnstudio.com
>>>>> > > > > >wrote:
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > Because has been said that some (or most) iOS 6 issues will be
>>>>> not
>>>>> > > part
>>>>> > > > > of
>>>>> > > > > > it...
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > On 10/8/12 9:03 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >Why do you feel that this release wouldn't be a stable release?
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Giorgio Natili <
>>>>> > > > g.natili@gnstudio.com>
>>>>> > > > > > >wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >> Just my 2 cents but you don't think is better to wait 2 weeks
>>>>> > more
>>>>> > > > and
>>>>> > > > > > >> have a pretty stable one?
>>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >> Giorgio
>>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >> On 10/3/12 7:56 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <
>>>>> > simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>I think we are looking good for 2.2.0 on Android. It will
>>>>> mostly
>>>>> > > be
>>>>> > > > a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>bug fix/performance release for us. I suspect we'll need until
>>>>> > > 2.3.0
>>>>> > > > > > >>>to get all the Camera code sorted.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>Simon Mac Donald
>>>>> > > > > > >>>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>>>> > > > > > >>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bryce Curtis <
>>>>> > > > curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>> It sounds like resolving iOS6 issues will drive when 2.2.0
>>>>> can
>>>>> > > be
>>>>> > > > > > >>>> tagged.  What is the readiness of the other platforms so we
>>>>> > can
>>>>> > > > > have a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>> 2.2 release when iOS is ready? Does it sound reasonable to
>>>>> > have
>>>>> > > a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>> release candidate in a week or so, then give a couple of
>>>>> weeks
>>>>> > > of
>>>>> > > > > > >>>> testing before tagging 2.2?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> If you folks see benefit for the iOS implementation, then
>>>>> I'm
>>>>> > > for
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>waiting.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On 10/2/12 8:48 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org>
>>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>I was thinking the same thing. We still have new
>>>>> iOS6-related
>>>>> > > > bugs
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>being
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>reported, so it might make sense to give this more time.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Becky Gibson
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>><gibson.becky@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> So, where do we stand on this?  I think working towards
>>>>> 2.2
>>>>> > > > > sooner
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>rather
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> than later would be the best solution since there appear
>>>>> to
>>>>> > > be
>>>>> > > > > many
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>issues
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> with cutting a point release.  Where do the other
>>>>> platforms
>>>>> > > > stand
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrt
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>   What more needs to be done?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> -becky
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Michal Mocny <
>>>>> > > > > mmocny@chromium.org
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > Nevermind, I'm not able to repro the report.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Michal Mocny
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><mmocny@chromium.org>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > someone just reported an issue with FileWriter on
>>>>> ios6
>>>>> > (
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1559)
>>>>> similar
>>>>> > > to
>>>>> > > > a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>FileReader
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > issue I fixed a few weeks back.  Fix is likely easy,
>>>>> > just
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>taking
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>look
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > right now to confirm and see if any other things need
>>>>> > > > fixing.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>Should
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> be
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > solved today.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Grieve
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><agrieve@chromium.org
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> The main fixes we'll need are:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console
>>>>> methods
>>>>> > > to
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>original
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console
>>>>> methods
>>>>> > > to
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>original
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Change default bridge
>>>>> > > from
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> XHR_NO_PAYLOAD
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> to... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Attempt to fix a
>>>>> crash
>>>>> > in
>>>>> > > > iOS
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>XHR
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> bridge
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> mode. commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Fix XHR exec bridge
>>>>> not
>>>>> > > > > working
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> non-file... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapsho
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> However, there were also extra params added to
>>>>> > > > FileTransfer
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>that
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>will
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > also
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need to be included to avoid a JS/Native mismatch.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> There looks to be some Globalization plugin JS
>>>>> commits
>>>>> > > as
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>well,
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>but I
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> haven't followed whether those will cause issues if
>>>>> > left
>>>>> > > > > out.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Brooks <
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > michael@michaelbrooks.ca
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > When we decide to roll 2.1.1, we should use JIRA
>>>>> to
>>>>> > > > track
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>the
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> release.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > Unfortunately, that means JIRA spam...
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Filip Maj <
>>>>> > > > fil@adobe.com
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > iOS folks: are there any commits needed newer
>>>>> than
>>>>> > > the
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> in
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> the
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > JS
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > for any critical fixes?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > On 9/27/12 3:40 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Just iOS afaik
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Cheers,
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >  Jesse
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Sent from my iPhone6
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >On 2012-09-27, at 3:36 PM, Filip Maj <
>>>>> > > fil@adobe.com>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> So which platforms are we fixing horrible
>>>>> bugs
>>>>> > > for
>>>>> > > > in
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.1?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> WP7
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > +
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > iOS?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> Basically: do any of the failing platforms
>>>>> that
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>_require_
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>fixes
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > any
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> JS fixes?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> On 9/27/12 3:32 PM, "Jesse" <
>>>>> > > > purplecabbage@gmail.com
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> Where / When are we tagging cordova-js ?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Jesse
>>>>> > MacFadyen
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Not disagreeing.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Cheers,
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>  Jesse
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> On 2012-09-27, at 2:31 AM, Brian LeRoux <
>>>>> > > > > b@brian.io>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> One click builds are not just for CI! Hand
>>>>> > > > rolling
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>always
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > error
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>prone,
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> and
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> time consuming repatative business like
>>>>> that
>>>>> > > is
>>>>> > > > a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>job
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> robot.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>You
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> then
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> can focus on code, and others can see (and
>>>>> > > > > therefor
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>improve
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> upon)
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> release
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> packaging.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> Regardless of all those benefits we want
>>>>> to
>>>>> > > get
>>>>> > > > > to a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>CI
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > future.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> (recommended reading on this, and more:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > http://pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer)
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012, Jesse
>>>>> > > MacFadyen
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> I agree in a continuous integration
>>>>> > scenario
>>>>> > > > that
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>makes
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > sense,
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> but
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>we
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> are not there yet, and probably not soon
>>>>> > > > either.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Jesse
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:46 PM, Brian LeRoux
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><b@brian.io>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Ya lets not ship a release with
>>>>> different
>>>>> > > ver
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>numbers
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> inside
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>bundled.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> That's askin for (more) issue tracking
>>>>> > > hell. A
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>release
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > is
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > just
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> one
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> liner / automated. If it isn't: it
>>>>> should
>>>>> > > be.
>>>>> > > > :p
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Filip
>>>>> > Maj
>>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> Link fail!
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1531
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 12:22 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
>>>>> <
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> purplecabbage@gmail.com
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Address which for windows phone?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Jesse
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:01 PM, Filip Maj
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><fil@adobe.com>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> O ya and we should possibly address
>>>>> > this
>>>>> > > > for
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>windows
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > phone
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 7
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>2.1.1
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jesse are there any instructions
>>>>> > anywhere
>>>>> > > > on
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>how
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>to
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>put
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > together
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> starter packages?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse
>>>>> MacFadyen"
>>>>> > <
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > purplecabbage@gmail.com
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think we should allow some
>>>>> latitude
>>>>> > in
>>>>> > > > the
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>point
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> releases
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > to
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> avoid
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the cascade of meaningless tags, and
>>>>> > > extra
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>work.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Can we release 2.1.1 and just say
>>>>> that
>>>>> > > it
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>contains
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> 2.1.1
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>iOS
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.0 for the rest? There are no API
>>>>> > > > changes
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>right?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jesse
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 9:54 AM, Michael
>>>>> > > Brooks
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <michael@michaelbrooks.ca>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As Becky mentioned, there's some
>>>>> big
>>>>> > > > issues
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>iOS
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> and
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> our
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> user's
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> really like to see a quick patch.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be in favour of tagging 2.1.1,
>>>>> > > where
>>>>> > > > > iOS
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tags
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > master
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> and
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> every
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> platform tags 2.1.1 on the same
>>>>> > commit
>>>>> > > as
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:59 AM,
>>>>> > Brian
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>LeRoux <
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> b@brian.io>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather we point 2.1.1 at the
>>>>> 2.1
>>>>> > > tag
>>>>> > > > > as
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> suggested
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Android,
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> continue work on 2.2 as planned,
>>>>> and
>>>>> > > > ship
>>>>> > > > > a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>fresh
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> release
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > for
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein the big showstopper type
>>>>> > > > problems
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>exist.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:48 PM,
>>>>> Joe
>>>>> > > > > Bowser
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should just start
>>>>> > cutting
>>>>> > > a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2.0
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> release.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >  This
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> log
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks too big for a point release
>>>>> > and
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>there's
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> enough
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> to
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merit
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That being said, Cordova 2.1.0
>>>>> > still
>>>>> > > > > isn't
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> officially
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> out,
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> complicates things.  Any word on
>>>>> > > that?
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 26, 2012 6:33 AM, "Andrew
>>>>> > > > Grieve"
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <agrieve@chromium.org>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another breakage that has been
>>>>> > > coming
>>>>> > > > > up a
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>lot
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>is
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > that
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > the
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> XHR
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't work on non file:///
>>>>> hosted
>>>>> > > > > paged.
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>It's
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> fixed
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> now,
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> would
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get it out ther
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> --
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> @purplecabbage
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> risingj.com
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>

Mime
View raw message