incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: [Discuss] Nomination of VP for Cordova
Date Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:22:27 GMT
+1 I agree Brian LeRoux


On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:

> yup, Brian LeRoux
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks
> <michael@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote:
> > +1 Brian LeRoux
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP
> >>
> >> On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I agree!
> >> >Or if you want a vote:
> >> >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP
> >> >
> >> >Cheers,
> >> >  Jesse
> >> >
> >> >Sent from my iPhone6
> >> >
> >> >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one has
> >> >>issues
> >> >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote and
> >> >>moving
> >> >> the graduation process forward.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thoughts?
> >> >>
> >> >> -Steve
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald
> >> >> <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean reward,
> of
> >> >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Simon Mac Donald
> >> >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen
> >> >>><purplecabbage@gmail.com
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus ones.
> >> >>>> Suggestion:
> >> >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new
+1 )
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Cheers,
> >> >>>>  Jesse
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Sent from my iPhone6
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks <
> >> >>> michael@michaelbrooks.ca>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered
for
> Apache
> >> >>>>>> Cordova's VP role.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and
has accepted
> the
> >> >>>> role.
> >> >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between
the Board and
> the
> >> >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice
on how
> long
> >> >>>>>>he
> >> >>>>>> chooses to hold the position.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Michael
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller <
> pmuellr@gmail.com>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting <
> >> >>> jukka.zitting@gmail.com
> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly
rotation, while
> others
> >> >>> keep
> >> >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign.
> >> >>>>>>> ...
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> See also
> >> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair
> >> >>>> .
> >> >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the
PMC chair (V.P.)
> has
> >> >>>>>>>>no
> >> >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other
member of the PMC.
> >> >>>>>>>>The
> >> >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly
rotation
> >> >>>>>>>thing -
> >> >>>> so
> >> >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if
they get tired
> of
> >> >>>>>>>it
> >> >>> -
> >> >>>> a
> >> >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking
this role
> >> >>>>>>>long-term
> >> >>> as
> >> >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller
> >> >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message