incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: point release?
Date Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:59:52 GMT
1502 fixed, and updated the version but forgot to add rc1 to the end,
oops. I will re-do that once the js and cordova-app bits are
tagged/updated and re-test. So far with the interim js all mobile-spec
tests are passing.

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> iOS these have been fixed:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
>
> I'm fixing this one:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502
>
> This one will be left, don't know if we can fix it:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603
>
> I will be updating the version numbers, template etc as well.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
>> On the Android side:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1606 (updating core plugins to
>> extend CordovaPlugin instead of Plugin)
>>
>> Update iOS list with already fixed ones gone:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> And 1563 is a dup of 902.
>>> I'm confused about what the problem is with 1604 (I posted a comment)
>>> And think that the following are also important:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502  - We need and updated image
>>> - does Adobe have a designer to work on that?
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Bugs that I'd like to see fixed before the RC:
>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603
>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1570
>>> >
>>> > 1570 is already marked closed?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1563
>>> > >
>>> > > We should be able to fix these over the next couple of days though.
>>> Want
>>> > to
>>> > > aim for cutting the RC Thursday?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Agree that tagging 2.2.0rc1 is the right thing to do at this point.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > I think we have a pretty good handle on the iOS 6 bugs.  Most of
>>> the
>>> > > ones
>>> > > > > reported recently have already been fixed and committed.  I would
>>> > push
>>> > > > for
>>> > > > > a release candidate this week so we can start focusing on testing
>>> and
>>> > > bug
>>> > > > > fixes rather than continue to add more features and optimizations.
>>> > I
>>> > > > > think once we have a release candidate we will get more feedback
>>> from
>>> > > > users
>>> > > > > who are not comfortable taking an edge build. This will get us more
>>> > > real
>>> > > > > world iOS 6 testing.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > -becky
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Giorgio Natili <
>>> > g.natili@gnstudio.com
>>> > > > > >wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Because has been said that some (or most) iOS 6 issues will be
>>> not
>>> > > part
>>> > > > > of
>>> > > > > > it...
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > On 10/8/12 9:03 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >Why do you feel that this release wouldn't be a stable release?
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Giorgio Natili <
>>> > > > g.natili@gnstudio.com>
>>> > > > > > >wrote:
>>> > > > > > >> Just my 2 cents but you don't think is better to wait 2 weeks
>>> > more
>>> > > > and
>>> > > > > > >> have a pretty stable one?
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> Giorgio
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> On 10/3/12 7:56 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <
>>> > simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>I think we are looking good for 2.2.0 on Android. It will
>>> mostly
>>> > > be
>>> > > > a
>>> > > > > > >>>bug fix/performance release for us. I suspect we'll need until
>>> > > 2.3.0
>>> > > > > > >>>to get all the Camera code sorted.
>>> > > > > > >>>
>>> > > > > > >>>Simon Mac Donald
>>> > > > > > >>>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>> > > > > > >>>
>>> > > > > > >>>
>>> > > > > > >>>On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bryce Curtis <
>>> > > > curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > > >>>wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>> It sounds like resolving iOS6 issues will drive when 2.2.0
>>> can
>>> > > be
>>> > > > > > >>>> tagged.  What is the readiness of the other platforms so we
>>> > can
>>> > > > > have a
>>> > > > > > >>>> 2.2 release when iOS is ready? Does it sound reasonable to
>>> > have
>>> > > a
>>> > > > > > >>>> release candidate in a week or so, then give a couple of
>>> weeks
>>> > > of
>>> > > > > > >>>> testing before tagging 2.2?
>>> > > > > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>> If you folks see benefit for the iOS implementation, then
>>> I'm
>>> > > for
>>> > > > > > >>>>>waiting.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>> On 10/2/12 8:48 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>I was thinking the same thing. We still have new
>>> iOS6-related
>>> > > > bugs
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>being
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>reported, so it might make sense to give this more time.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Becky Gibson
>>> > > > > > >>>>>><gibson.becky@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> So, where do we stand on this?  I think working towards
>>> 2.2
>>> > > > > sooner
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>rather
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> than later would be the best solution since there appear
>>> to
>>> > > be
>>> > > > > many
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>issues
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> with cutting a point release.  Where do the other
>>> platforms
>>> > > > stand
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrt
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2?
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>   What more needs to be done?
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> -becky
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Michal Mocny <
>>> > > > > mmocny@chromium.org
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > Nevermind, I'm not able to repro the report.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Michal Mocny
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><mmocny@chromium.org>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > someone just reported an issue with FileWriter on
>>> ios6
>>> > (
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1559)
>>> similar
>>> > > to
>>> > > > a
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>FileReader
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > issue I fixed a few weeks back.  Fix is likely easy,
>>> > just
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>taking
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>a
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>look
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > right now to confirm and see if any other things need
>>> > > > fixing.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>Should
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> be
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > solved today.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Grieve
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><agrieve@chromium.org
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> The main fixes we'll need are:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console
>>> methods
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>original
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console
>>> methods
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>original
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Change default bridge
>>> > > from
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> XHR_NO_PAYLOAD
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> to... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Attempt to fix a
>>> crash
>>> > in
>>> > > > iOS
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>XHR
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> bridge
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> mode. commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Fix XHR exec bridge
>>> not
>>> > > > > working
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> non-file... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapsho
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> However, there were also extra params added to
>>> > > > FileTransfer
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>that
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>will
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > also
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need to be included to avoid a JS/Native mismatch.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> There looks to be some Globalization plugin JS
>>> commits
>>> > > as
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>well,
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>but I
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> haven't followed whether those will cause issues if
>>> > left
>>> > > > > out.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Brooks <
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > michael@michaelbrooks.ca
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > When we decide to roll 2.1.1, we should use JIRA
>>> to
>>> > > > track
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>the
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> release.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > Unfortunately, that means JIRA spam...
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Filip Maj <
>>> > > > fil@adobe.com
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > iOS folks: are there any commits needed newer
>>> than
>>> > > the
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> in
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> the
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > JS
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > for any critical fixes?
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > On 9/27/12 3:40 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Just iOS afaik
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Cheers,
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >  Jesse
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Sent from my iPhone6
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >On 2012-09-27, at 3:36 PM, Filip Maj <
>>> > > fil@adobe.com>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> So which platforms are we fixing horrible
>>> bugs
>>> > > for
>>> > > > in
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.1?
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> WP7
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > +
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > iOS?
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> Basically: do any of the failing platforms
>>> that
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>_require_
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>fixes
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > any
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> JS fixes?
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> On 9/27/12 3:32 PM, "Jesse" <
>>> > > > purplecabbage@gmail.com
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> Where / When are we tagging cordova-js ?
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Jesse
>>> > MacFadyen
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Not disagreeing.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Cheers,
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>  Jesse
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> On 2012-09-27, at 2:31 AM, Brian LeRoux <
>>> > > > > b@brian.io>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> One click builds are not just for CI! Hand
>>> > > > rolling
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>always
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > error
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>prone,
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> and
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> time consuming repatative business like
>>> that
>>> > > is
>>> > > > a
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>job
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for a
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> robot.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>You
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> then
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> can focus on code, and others can see (and
>>> > > > > therefor
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>improve
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> upon)
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> release
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> packaging.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> Regardless of all those benefits we want
>>> to
>>> > > get
>>> > > > > to a
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>CI
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > future.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> (recommended reading on this, and more:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>> > http://pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer)
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012, Jesse
>>> > > MacFadyen
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> I agree in a continuous integration
>>> > scenario
>>> > > > that
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>makes
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > sense,
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> but
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>we
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> are not there yet, and probably not soon
>>> > > > either.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Cheers,
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Jesse
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:46 PM, Brian LeRoux
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><b@brian.io>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Ya lets not ship a release with
>>> different
>>> > > ver
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>numbers
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> inside
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>bundled.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> That's askin for (more) issue tracking
>>> > > hell. A
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>release
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > is
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > just
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>a
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> one
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> liner / automated. If it isn't: it
>>> should
>>> > > be.
>>> > > > :p
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Filip
>>> > Maj
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> Link fail!
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1531
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 12:22 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
>>> <
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> purplecabbage@gmail.com
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Address which for windows phone?
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Jesse
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:01 PM, Filip Maj
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><fil@adobe.com>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> O ya and we should possibly address
>>> > this
>>> > > > for
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>windows
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > phone
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 7
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>2.1.1
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jesse are there any instructions
>>> > anywhere
>>> > > > on
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>how
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>to
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>put
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > together
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> those
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> starter packages?
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse
>>> MacFadyen"
>>> > <
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > purplecabbage@gmail.com
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think we should allow some
>>> latitude
>>> > in
>>> > > > the
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>point
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> releases
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > to
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> avoid
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the cascade of meaningless tags, and
>>> > > extra
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>work.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Can we release 2.1.1 and just say
>>> that
>>> > > it
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>contains
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> 2.1.1
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>iOS
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.0 for the rest? There are no API
>>> > > > changes
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>right?
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jesse
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 9:54 AM, Michael
>>> > > Brooks
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <michael@michaelbrooks.ca>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As Becky mentioned, there's some
>>> big
>>> > > > issues
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>iOS
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> and
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> our
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> user's
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> really like to see a quick patch.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be in favour of tagging 2.1.1,
>>> > > where
>>> > > > > iOS
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tags
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > master
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> and
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> every
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> platform tags 2.1.1 on the same
>>> > commit
>>> > > as
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:59 AM,
>>> > Brian
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>LeRoux <
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> b@brian.io>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather we point 2.1.1 at the
>>> 2.1
>>> > > tag
>>> > > > > as
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> suggested
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Android,
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> continue work on 2.2 as planned,
>>> and
>>> > > > ship
>>> > > > > a
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>fresh
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> release
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > for
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein the big showstopper type
>>> > > > problems
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>exist.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:48 PM,
>>> Joe
>>> > > > > Bowser
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should just start
>>> > cutting
>>> > > a
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2.0
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> release.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >  This
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> log
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks too big for a point release
>>> > and
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>there's
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> enough
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> to
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merit
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That being said, Cordova 2.1.0
>>> > still
>>> > > > > isn't
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> officially
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> out,
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> complicates things.  Any word on
>>> > > that?
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 26, 2012 6:33 AM, "Andrew
>>> > > > Grieve"
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <agrieve@chromium.org>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another breakage that has been
>>> > > coming
>>> > > > > up a
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>lot
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>is
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > that
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > the
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> XHR
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't work on non file:///
>>> hosted
>>> > > > > paged.
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>It's
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> fixed
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> now,
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> would
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get it out ther
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> --
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> @purplecabbage
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> risingj.com
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>

Mime
View raw message