incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: point release?
Date Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:13:32 GMT
iOS updated to 2.2.0rc1 (cordova-js, cordova-hello-world). Mobile-spec
passes all tests.

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1502 fixed, and updated the version but forgot to add rc1 to the end,
> oops. I will re-do that once the js and cordova-app bits are
> tagged/updated and re-test. So far with the interim js all mobile-spec
> tests are passing.
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>> iOS these have been fixed:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
>>
>> I'm fixing this one:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502
>>
>> This one will be left, don't know if we can fix it:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603
>>
>> I will be updating the version numbers, template etc as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> On the Android side:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1606 (updating core plugins to
>>> extend CordovaPlugin instead of Plugin)
>>>
>>> Update iOS list with already fixed ones gone:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> And 1563 is a dup of 902.
>>>> I'm confused about what the problem is with 1604 (I posted a comment)
>>>> And think that the following are also important:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502  - We need and updated image
>>>> - does Adobe have a designer to work on that?
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Bugs that I'd like to see fixed before the RC:
>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603
>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1570
>>>> >
>>>> > 1570 is already marked closed?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1563
>>>> > >
>>>> > > We should be able to fix these over the next couple of days though.
>>>> Want
>>>> > to
>>>> > > aim for cutting the RC Thursday?
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > Agree that tagging 2.2.0rc1 is the right thing to do at this point.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > I think we have a pretty good handle on the iOS 6 bugs.  Most of
>>>> the
>>>> > > ones
>>>> > > > > reported recently have already been fixed and committed.  I would
>>>> > push
>>>> > > > for
>>>> > > > > a release candidate this week so we can start focusing on testing
>>>> and
>>>> > > bug
>>>> > > > > fixes rather than continue to add more features and optimizations.
>>>> > I
>>>> > > > > think once we have a release candidate we will get more feedback
>>>> from
>>>> > > > users
>>>> > > > > who are not comfortable taking an edge build. This will get us more
>>>> > > real
>>>> > > > > world iOS 6 testing.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > -becky
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Giorgio Natili <
>>>> > g.natili@gnstudio.com
>>>> > > > > >wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > > Because has been said that some (or most) iOS 6 issues will be
>>>> not
>>>> > > part
>>>> > > > > of
>>>> > > > > > it...
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > On 10/8/12 9:03 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >Why do you feel that this release wouldn't be a stable release?
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Giorgio Natili <
>>>> > > > g.natili@gnstudio.com>
>>>> > > > > > >wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >> Just my 2 cents but you don't think is better to wait 2 weeks
>>>> > more
>>>> > > > and
>>>> > > > > > >> have a pretty stable one?
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> Giorgio
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> On 10/3/12 7:56 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <
>>>> > simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>I think we are looking good for 2.2.0 on Android. It will
>>>> mostly
>>>> > > be
>>>> > > > a
>>>> > > > > > >>>bug fix/performance release for us. I suspect we'll need until
>>>> > > 2.3.0
>>>> > > > > > >>>to get all the Camera code sorted.
>>>> > > > > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>Simon Mac Donald
>>>> > > > > > >>>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>>> > > > > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bryce Curtis <
>>>> > > > curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > > >>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>> It sounds like resolving iOS6 issues will drive when 2.2.0
>>>> can
>>>> > > be
>>>> > > > > > >>>> tagged.  What is the readiness of the other platforms so we
>>>> > can
>>>> > > > > have a
>>>> > > > > > >>>> 2.2 release when iOS is ready? Does it sound reasonable to
>>>> > have
>>>> > > a
>>>> > > > > > >>>> release candidate in a week or so, then give a couple of
>>>> weeks
>>>> > > of
>>>> > > > > > >>>> testing before tagging 2.2?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>> If you folks see benefit for the iOS implementation, then
>>>> I'm
>>>> > > for
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>waiting.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On 10/2/12 8:48 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org>
>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>I was thinking the same thing. We still have new
>>>> iOS6-related
>>>> > > > bugs
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>being
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>reported, so it might make sense to give this more time.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Becky Gibson
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>><gibson.becky@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> So, where do we stand on this?  I think working towards
>>>> 2.2
>>>> > > > > sooner
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>rather
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> than later would be the best solution since there appear
>>>> to
>>>> > > be
>>>> > > > > many
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>issues
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> with cutting a point release.  Where do the other
>>>> platforms
>>>> > > > stand
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrt
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>   What more needs to be done?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> -becky
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Michal Mocny <
>>>> > > > > mmocny@chromium.org
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > Nevermind, I'm not able to repro the report.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Michal Mocny
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><mmocny@chromium.org>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > someone just reported an issue with FileWriter on
>>>> ios6
>>>> > (
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1559)
>>>> similar
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > > a
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>FileReader
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > issue I fixed a few weeks back.  Fix is likely easy,
>>>> > just
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>taking
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>a
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>look
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > right now to confirm and see if any other things need
>>>> > > > fixing.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>Should
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> be
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > solved today.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Grieve
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><agrieve@chromium.org
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> The main fixes we'll need are:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console
>>>> methods
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>original
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console
>>>> methods
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>original
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Change default bridge
>>>> > > from
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> XHR_NO_PAYLOAD
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> to... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Attempt to fix a
>>>> crash
>>>> > in
>>>> > > > iOS
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>XHR
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> bridge
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> mode. commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Fix XHR exec bridge
>>>> not
>>>> > > > > working
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> non-file... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapsho
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> However, there were also extra params added to
>>>> > > > FileTransfer
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>that
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>will
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > also
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need to be included to avoid a JS/Native mismatch.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> There looks to be some Globalization plugin JS
>>>> commits
>>>> > > as
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>well,
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>but I
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> haven't followed whether those will cause issues if
>>>> > left
>>>> > > > > out.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Brooks <
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > michael@michaelbrooks.ca
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > When we decide to roll 2.1.1, we should use JIRA
>>>> to
>>>> > > > track
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>the
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> release.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > Unfortunately, that means JIRA spam...
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Filip Maj <
>>>> > > > fil@adobe.com
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > iOS folks: are there any commits needed newer
>>>> than
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> in
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> the
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > JS
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > for any critical fixes?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > On 9/27/12 3:40 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Just iOS afaik
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Cheers,
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >  Jesse
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Sent from my iPhone6
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >On 2012-09-27, at 3:36 PM, Filip Maj <
>>>> > > fil@adobe.com>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> So which platforms are we fixing horrible
>>>> bugs
>>>> > > for
>>>> > > > in
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.1?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> WP7
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > +
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > iOS?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> Basically: do any of the failing platforms
>>>> that
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>_require_
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>fixes
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > any
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> JS fixes?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> On 9/27/12 3:32 PM, "Jesse" <
>>>> > > > purplecabbage@gmail.com
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> Where / When are we tagging cordova-js ?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Jesse
>>>> > MacFadyen
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Not disagreeing.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Cheers,
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>  Jesse
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> On 2012-09-27, at 2:31 AM, Brian LeRoux <
>>>> > > > > b@brian.io>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> One click builds are not just for CI! Hand
>>>> > > > rolling
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>always
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > error
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>prone,
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> and
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> time consuming repatative business like
>>>> that
>>>> > > is
>>>> > > > a
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>job
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for a
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> robot.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>You
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> then
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> can focus on code, and others can see (and
>>>> > > > > therefor
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>improve
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> upon)
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> release
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> packaging.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> Regardless of all those benefits we want
>>>> to
>>>> > > get
>>>> > > > > to a
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>CI
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > future.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> (recommended reading on this, and more:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>>> > http://pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer)
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012, Jesse
>>>> > > MacFadyen
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> I agree in a continuous integration
>>>> > scenario
>>>> > > > that
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>makes
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > sense,
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> but
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>we
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> are not there yet, and probably not soon
>>>> > > > either.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Cheers,
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Jesse
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:46 PM, Brian LeRoux
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><b@brian.io>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Ya lets not ship a release with
>>>> different
>>>> > > ver
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>numbers
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> inside
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>bundled.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> That's askin for (more) issue tracking
>>>> > > hell. A
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>release
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > is
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > just
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>a
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> one
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> liner / automated. If it isn't: it
>>>> should
>>>> > > be.
>>>> > > > :p
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Filip
>>>> > Maj
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> Link fail!
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1531
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 12:22 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
>>>> <
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> purplecabbage@gmail.com
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Address which for windows phone?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Jesse
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:01 PM, Filip Maj
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>><fil@adobe.com>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> O ya and we should possibly address
>>>> > this
>>>> > > > for
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>windows
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > phone
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 7
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>2.1.1
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jesse are there any instructions
>>>> > anywhere
>>>> > > > on
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>how
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>to
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>put
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > together
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> those
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> starter packages?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse
>>>> MacFadyen"
>>>> > <
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > purplecabbage@gmail.com
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think we should allow some
>>>> latitude
>>>> > in
>>>> > > > the
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>point
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> releases
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > to
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> avoid
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the cascade of meaningless tags, and
>>>> > > extra
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>work.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Can we release 2.1.1 and just say
>>>> that
>>>> > > it
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>contains
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> 2.1.1
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>iOS
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.0 for the rest? There are no API
>>>> > > > changes
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>right?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jesse
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 9:54 AM, Michael
>>>> > > Brooks
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <michael@michaelbrooks.ca>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As Becky mentioned, there's some
>>>> big
>>>> > > > issues
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>iOS
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> and
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> our
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> user's
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> really like to see a quick patch.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be in favour of tagging 2.1.1,
>>>> > > where
>>>> > > > > iOS
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tags
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > master
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> and
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> every
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> platform tags 2.1.1 on the same
>>>> > commit
>>>> > > as
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:59 AM,
>>>> > Brian
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>LeRoux <
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> b@brian.io>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather we point 2.1.1 at the
>>>> 2.1
>>>> > > tag
>>>> > > > > as
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> suggested
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Android,
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> continue work on 2.2 as planned,
>>>> and
>>>> > > > ship
>>>> > > > > a
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>fresh
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> release
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > for
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein the big showstopper type
>>>> > > > problems
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>exist.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:48 PM,
>>>> Joe
>>>> > > > > Bowser
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should just start
>>>> > cutting
>>>> > > a
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2.0
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> release.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >  This
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> log
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks too big for a point release
>>>> > and
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>there's
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> enough
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> to
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merit
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That being said, Cordova 2.1.0
>>>> > still
>>>> > > > > isn't
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> officially
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> out,
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> complicates things.  Any word on
>>>> > > that?
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 26, 2012 6:33 AM, "Andrew
>>>> > > > Grieve"
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <agrieve@chromium.org>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another breakage that has been
>>>> > > coming
>>>> > > > > up a
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>lot
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>is
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > that
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > the
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> XHR
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't work on non file:///
>>>> hosted
>>>> > > > > paged.
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>It's
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> fixed
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> now,
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> would
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get it out ther
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> --
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> @purplecabbage
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> risingj.com
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>

Mime
View raw message