incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: point release?
Date Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:47:28 GMT
iOS these have been fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600

I'm fixing this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502

This one will be left, don't know if we can fix it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603

I will be updating the version numbers, template etc as well.



On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
> On the Android side:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1606 (updating core plugins to
> extend CordovaPlugin instead of Plugin)
>
> Update iOS list with already fixed ones gone:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> And 1563 is a dup of 902.
>> I'm confused about what the problem is with 1604 (I posted a comment)
>> And think that the following are also important:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502  - We need and updated image
>> - does Adobe have a designer to work on that?
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Bugs that I'd like to see fixed before the RC:
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1570
>> >
>> > 1570 is already marked closed?
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1563
>> > >
>> > > We should be able to fix these over the next couple of days though.
>> Want
>> > to
>> > > aim for cutting the RC Thursday?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Agree that tagging 2.2.0rc1 is the right thing to do at this point.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I think we have a pretty good handle on the iOS 6 bugs.  Most
of
>> the
>> > > ones
>> > > > > reported recently have already been fixed and committed.  I would
>> > push
>> > > > for
>> > > > > a release candidate this week so we can start focusing on testing
>> and
>> > > bug
>> > > > > fixes rather than continue to add more features and optimizations.
>> > I
>> > > > > think once we have a release candidate we will get more feedback
>> from
>> > > > users
>> > > > > who are not comfortable taking an edge build. This will get us
more
>> > > real
>> > > > > world iOS 6 testing.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -becky
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Giorgio Natili <
>> > g.natili@gnstudio.com
>> > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Because has been said that some (or most) iOS 6 issues will
be
>> not
>> > > part
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > it...
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On 10/8/12 9:03 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >Why do you feel that this release wouldn't be a stable
release?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Giorgio Natili <
>> > > > g.natili@gnstudio.com>
>> > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > > >> Just my 2 cents but you don't think is better to
wait 2 weeks
>> > more
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > >> have a pretty stable one?
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Giorgio
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> On 10/3/12 7:56 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <
>> > simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>>I think we are looking good for 2.2.0 on Android.
It will
>> mostly
>> > > be
>> > > > a
>> > > > > > >>>bug fix/performance release for us. I suspect
we'll need until
>> > > 2.3.0
>> > > > > > >>>to get all the Camera code sorted.
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>Simon Mac Donald
>> > > > > > >>>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bryce Curtis
<
>> > > > curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > >>>wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>> It sounds like resolving iOS6 issues will
drive when 2.2.0
>> can
>> > > be
>> > > > > > >>>> tagged.  What is the readiness of the other
platforms so we
>> > can
>> > > > > have a
>> > > > > > >>>> 2.2 release when iOS is ready? Does it
sound reasonable to
>> > have
>> > > a
>> > > > > > >>>> release candidate in a week or so, then
give a couple of
>> weeks
>> > > of
>> > > > > > >>>> testing before tagging 2.2?
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Filip
Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>> If you folks see benefit for the iOS
implementation, then
>> I'm
>> > > for
>> > > > > > >>>>>waiting.
>> > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>> On 10/2/12 8:48 AM, "Andrew Grieve"
<agrieve@chromium.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>I was thinking the same thing. We
still have new
>> iOS6-related
>> > > > bugs
>> > > > > > >>>>>>being
>> > > > > > >>>>>>reported, so it might make sense
to give this more time.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM,
Becky Gibson
>> > > > > > >>>>>><gibson.becky@gmail.com>wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> So, where do we stand on this?
 I think working towards
>> 2.2
>> > > > > sooner
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>rather
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> than later would be the best
solution since there appear
>> to
>> > > be
>> > > > > many
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>issues
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> with cutting a point release.
 Where do the other
>> platforms
>> > > > stand
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrt
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2?
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>   What more needs to be done?
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> -becky
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:38
PM, Michal Mocny <
>> > > > > mmocny@chromium.org
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > Nevermind, I'm not able
to repro the report.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at
1:05 PM, Michal Mocny
>> > > > > > >>>>>>><mmocny@chromium.org>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > someone just reported
an issue with FileWriter on
>> ios6
>> > (
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1559)
>> similar
>> > > to
>> > > > a
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>FileReader
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > issue I fixed a few
weeks back.  Fix is likely easy,
>> > just
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>taking
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>a
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>look
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > right now to confirm
and see if any other things need
>> > > > fixing.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>Should
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> be
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > solved today.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012
at 11:04 AM, Andrew Grieve
>> > > > > > >>>>>>><agrieve@chromium.org
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> The main fixes
we'll need are:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick
Mueller [ios] route console
>> methods
>> > > to
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>original
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff
| tree | snapshot
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick
Mueller [ios] route console
>> methods
>> > > to
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>original
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff
| tree | snapshot
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew
Grieve [ios] Change default bridge
>> > > from
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> XHR_NO_PAYLOAD
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> to... commit
| commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew
Grieve [ios] Attempt to fix a
>> crash
>> > in
>> > > > iOS
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>XHR
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> bridge
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> mode. commit
| commitdiff | tree | snapshot
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew
Grieve [ios] Fix XHR exec bridge
>> not
>> > > > > working
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> non-file... commit
| commitdiff | tree | snapsho
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> However, there
were also extra params added to
>> > > > FileTransfer
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>that
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>will
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > also
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need to be included
to avoid a JS/Native mismatch.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> There looks to
be some Globalization plugin JS
>> commits
>> > > as
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>well,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>but I
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> haven't followed
whether those will cause issues if
>> > left
>> > > > > out.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> On Thu, Sep 27,
2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Brooks <
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > michael@michaelbrooks.ca
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > When we
decide to roll 2.1.1, we should use JIRA
>> to
>> > > > track
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>the
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> release.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > Unfortunately,
that means JIRA spam...
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > On Thu,
Sep 27, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Filip Maj <
>> > > > fil@adobe.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > iOS
folks: are there any commits needed newer
>> than
>> > > the
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> in
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> the
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > JS
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > for
any critical fixes?
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > On
9/27/12 3:40 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
>> > > > > > >>>>>>><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Just
iOS afaik
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Cheers,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
 Jesse
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Sent
from my iPhone6
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >On
2012-09-27, at 3:36 PM, Filip Maj <
>> > > fil@adobe.com>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
So which platforms are we fixing horrible
>> bugs
>> > > for
>> > > > in
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.1?
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> WP7
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > +
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > iOS?
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
Basically: do any of the failing platforms
>> that
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>_require_
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>fixes
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > any
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
JS fixes?
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
On 9/27/12 3:32 PM, "Jesse" <
>> > > > purplecabbage@gmail.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
Where / When are we tagging cordova-js ?
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Jesse
>> > MacFadyen
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
<purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
Not disagreeing.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
Cheers,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
 Jesse
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
Sent from my iPhone6
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
On 2012-09-27, at 2:31 AM, Brian LeRoux <
>> > > > > b@brian.io>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
One click builds are not just for CI! Hand
>> > > > rolling
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>always
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > error
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>prone,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
and
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
time consuming repatative business like
>> that
>> > > is
>> > > > a
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>job
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for a
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> robot.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>You
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
then
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
can focus on code, and others can see (and
>> > > > > therefor
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>improve
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> upon)
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
release
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
packaging.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
Regardless of all those benefits we want
>> to
>> > > get
>> > > > > to a
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>CI
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > future.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
(recommended reading on this, and more:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > http://pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer)
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
On Thursday, September 27, 2012, Jesse
>> > > MacFadyen
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
I agree in a continuous integration
>> > scenario
>> > > > that
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>makes
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > sense,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> but
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>we
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
are not there yet, and probably not soon
>> > > > either.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
Cheers,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
Jesse
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
Sent from my iPhone6
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
On 2012-09-26, at 12:46 PM, Brian LeRoux
>> > > > > > >>>>>>><b@brian.io>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
Ya lets not ship a release with
>> different
>> > > ver
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>numbers
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> inside
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>bundled.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
That's askin for (more) issue tracking
>> > > hell. A
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>release
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > is
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > just
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>a
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
one
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
liner / automated. If it isn't: it
>> should
>> > > be.
>> > > > :p
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Filip
>> > Maj
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
Link fail!
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1531
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
On 9/26/12 12:22 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
>> <
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> purplecabbage@gmail.com
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
Address which for windows phone?
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
Cheers,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
Jesse
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
Sent from my iPhone6
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
On 2012-09-26, at 12:01 PM, Filip Maj
>> > > > > > >>>>>>><fil@adobe.com>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
O ya and we should possibly address
>> > this
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>windows
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > phone
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 7
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>2.1.1
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
Jesse are there any instructions
>> > anywhere
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>how
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>to
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>put
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > together
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
those
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
starter packages?
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
On 9/26/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse
>> MacFadyen"
>> > <
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > purplecabbage@gmail.com
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
I think we should allow some
>> latitude
>> > in
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>point
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> releases
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > to
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
avoid
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
the cascade of meaningless tags, and
>> > > extra
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>work.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
Can we release 2.1.1 and just say
>> that
>> > > it
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>contains
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> 2.1.1
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>iOS
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
and
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
2.1.0 for the rest? There are no API
>> > > > changes
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>right?
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
Cheers,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
Jesse
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
Sent from my iPhone6
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
On 2012-09-26, at 9:54 AM, Michael
>> > > Brooks
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
<michael@michaelbrooks.ca>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
As Becky mentioned, there's some
>> big
>> > > > issues
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>for
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>iOS
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> and
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> our
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
user's
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
would
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
really like to see a quick patch.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
I'd be in favour of tagging 2.1.1,
>> > > where
>> > > > > iOS
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>tags
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > master
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> and
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
every
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
other
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
platform tags 2.1.1 on the same
>> > commit
>> > > as
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
Michael
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:59 AM,
>> > Brian
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>LeRoux <
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> b@brian.io>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'd rather we point 2.1.1 at the
>> 2.1
>> > > tag
>> > > > > as
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> suggested
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Android,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
continue work on 2.2 as planned,
>> and
>> > > > ship
>> > > > > a
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>fresh
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> release
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > for
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
iOS
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
wherein the big showstopper type
>> > > > problems
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>exist.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:48 PM,
>> Joe
>> > > > > Bowser
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I think we should just start
>> > cutting
>> > > a
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2.0
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> release.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >  This
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
change
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
log
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
looks too big for a point release
>> > and
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>there's
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> enough
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
improvements
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
to
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
merit
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
it.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That being said, Cordova 2.1.0
>> > still
>> > > > > isn't
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> officially
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> out,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
which
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
complicates things.  Any word on
>> > > that?
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sep 26, 2012 6:33 AM, "Andrew
>> > > > Grieve"
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<agrieve@chromium.org>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Another breakage that has been
>> > > coming
>> > > > > up a
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>lot
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>is
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > that
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > the
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
new
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
XHR
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
bridge
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
didn't work on non file:///
>> hosted
>> > > > > paged.
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>It's
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> fixed
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> now,
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>
would
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
be
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
good
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
to get it out ther
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
--
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
@purplecabbage
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>
risingj.com
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message