incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian LeRoux...@brian.io>
Subject Re: [Discuss] Nomination of VP for Cordova
Date Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:21:40 GMT
Eh this is a nice thread to come home to ----thx for the support everyone.
I promise to use these secretarial-in-nature powers for good. In
seriousness, this community is a very humbling place to operate in, and its
an honor to work w/ you all.


On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Giorgio Natili <g.natili@gnstudio.com>wrote:

> +1 Brian
>
> On 10/9/12 8:37 PM, "Tim Kim" <timkim85@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >+1 for Brian Leroux.
> >
> >On 9 October 2012 11:22, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 I agree Brian LeRoux
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > yup, Brian LeRoux
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks
> >> > <michael@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote:
> >> > > +1 Brian LeRoux
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> +1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> >I agree!
> >> > >> >Or if you want a vote:
> >> > >> >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >Cheers,
> >> > >> >  Jesse
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >Sent from my iPhone6
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus
if no one
> >>has
> >> > >> >>issues
> >> > >> >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having
to vote
> >>and
> >> > >> >>moving
> >> > >> >> the graduation process forward.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Thoughts?
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> -Steve
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald
> >> > >> >> <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment,
I mean
> >> reward,
> >> > of
> >> > >> >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux.
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>> Simon Mac Donald
> >> > >> >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen
> >> > >> >>><purplecabbage@gmail.com
> >> > >> >>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >> >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting
plus
> >>ones.
> >> > >> >>>> Suggestion:
> >> > >> >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree'
( the new
> >>+1 )
> >> > >> >>>>
> >> > >> >>>>
> >> > >> >>>> Cheers,
> >> > >> >>>>  Jesse
> >> > >> >>>>
> >> > >> >>>> Sent from my iPhone6
> >> > >> >>>>
> >> > >> >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>
> >> > >> >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as
per Apache.
> >> > >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks
<
> >> > >> >>> michael@michaelbrooks.ca>
> >> > >> >>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour
to be considered for
> >> > Apache
> >> > >> >>>>>> Cordova's VP role.
> >> > >> >>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority
of votes and has
> >> accepted
> >> > the
> >> > >> >>>> role.
> >> > >> >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface
between the Board
> >> and
> >> > the
> >> > >> >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely
his choice on
> >>how
> >> > long
> >> > >> >>>>>>he
> >> > >> >>>>>> chooses to hold the position.
> >> > >> >>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>> Michael
> >> > >> >>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick
Mueller <
> >> > pmuellr@gmail.com>
> >> > >> >>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka
Zitting <
> >> > >> >>> jukka.zitting@gmail.com
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Some projects have something
like a yearly rotation, while
> >> > others
> >> > >> >>> keep
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to
resign.
> >> > >> >>>>>>> ...
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> See also
> >> > >> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair
> >> > >> >>>> .
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here
is that the PMC chair
> >>(V.P.)
> >> > has
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>no
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters
than any other member of the
> >> PMC.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>>The
> >> > >> >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us
make this a yearly
> >>rotation
> >> > >> >>>>>>>thing -
> >> > >> >>>> so
> >> > >> >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with
the role, if they get
> >>tired
> >> > of
> >> > >> >>>>>>>it
> >> > >> >>> -
> >> > >> >>>> a
> >> > >> >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with
someone taking this role
> >> > >> >>>>>>>long-term
> >> > >> >>> as
> >> > >> >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it.
> >> > >> >>>>>>>
> >> > >> >>>>>>> --
> >> > >> >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller
> >> > >> >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org
> >> > >> >>>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Timothy Kim
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message