Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E01D1D837 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1318 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2012 18:54:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 1286 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2012 18:54:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 1278 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2012 18:54:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:54:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:53:55 +0000 Received: by weyt44 with SMTP id t44so210468wey.6 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:53:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Se8DtMpM3nbKn6lS56VXH1qb+KMgDVT0JQ5ZsGzHnos=; b=OXI/mao/joM+BQni3lANwx0Q/RIN8uninG06mQPksQUC0oJOD7fAz+rCDNGXmTrAeo pYJGzZ3YPq1BY+/SXQMchWSrBjlQeQ4gkGvJf2TcN8oCBEux414wPl6bJS7RPevsp/He tZuqWVMgLemt7lFga3Ey2I5NLIiKCJXSZwXlev35cZKDKYqwEsj4+7QQ8JVFG3+ejhQQ l8hT6khZmOb/vam7tWPyrvhfFi5PQ1Un3O0bQ92NosW6Fh9ew0WerxRcJuHU0JNF2wgx G23Cuxv1ZHDcBQug0vugdsx9AiSGNCahzaHRunPFuzxT/jKf7d2p4dmBQ6mzD5kOJQ2z SMBA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.73.76 with SMTP id j12mr6200626wiv.11.1348167214720; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.195.7 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:53:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:53:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Time to own the camera? From: Joe Bowser To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sounds good. Let me know which branch you're working on. I have some camera code kicking around here as well to add to this. On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Simon MacDonald wrote: > Yeah, I think it is time. I just responded to the guy who opened the > ticket on JIRA saying roughly the same thing. Also, I've been dealing > with some internal guys for the past 24 hours on camera problems so I > really think it would be less of a pain in the ass to bring the camera > internal to Cordova. > > I'm willing to take a first pass at it starting tomorrow. > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: >> Hey >> >> We're getting a lot of people complaining about the camera crashing >> and the lifecycle issues. Now, I've tried using the built in >> WebView.restoreState methods, and all I have gotten is a crashing >> application, so I'm thinking that it might be time that we owned the >> camera again. I'm willing to do the work on this one, but I want to >> know if people think this is a good idea, or whether we should just >> shunt this to plugin developers again and hope they don't abandon it. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Joe