Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79008DABC for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27647 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2012 00:34:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27619 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2012 00:34:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27610 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2012 00:34:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:34:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anis.kadri@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:34:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id lz20so9966110obb.6 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:33:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Gr7hKhDMS8NcEqq1P4Yt0zeFtXxmdSEtoW6yM6GAT74=; b=k4wcxCFYPwC+mA/K1x11z2HHDOGtzt4GlCeChILiQ8/vMuY2AxeTAjgxlchanwRXyK 4qMyL4OBi+psLCpMcGXkfXKnBepCwmo4ZpfCO7DEcewVbdt0S0ipKP3X+FJACp5OTfrK VoMy/W7dG0Mfc6tsK9aALcv+ZP2TrPFWeGG2zc5XdYVAXsxFhX+BWzbwDsCkG0bipfRc qqBVjQPOoy9G/EmfipuIapsLW4p1WaQf6gNhqc5Fsy8Bw70M0GTgiCEu/9Pb2TYXz4Gz NKN6XBzqPMlEHyeYUY1OSTGbek5jnW80Mzdsj/1qUWpIrmSY/G6Me3KlfPQrg0a0ahQg zFKA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.25.226 with SMTP id f2mr13282316oeg.53.1347928427838; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.2.6 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:33:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:33:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Android] Android versioning phase-out (2.1 and 3.x)?? From: Anis KADRI To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb201e21fbcee04c9ef0bc7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8fb201e21fbcee04c9ef0bc7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Talking about the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Anis KADRI wrote: > That was last year and Samsung has updated them to 4.0.3 :-) > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Brion Vibber >> wrote: >> > >> > I would not mind dropping 2.1; our apps for Wikipedia have been 2.2+ >> anyway >> > due to breakages in the 2.1 browser. >> > >> > 3/3.2 would be slightly sad to miss only because there are Honeycomb >> > tablets that haven't received ICS updates, including my Galaxy Tab 10.1 >> but >> > ... let's be honest there's not a lot of them out there. I'm not sure >> how >> > to blacklist those particular versions in the AndroidManifest however >> while >> > still being compatible with 2.2/2.3... >> > >> >> That's a very good point. I'm almost convinced that the 3.1 on >> Google's dashboard is literally the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 devices >> that Google gave away at IO a couple of years ago that were pretty >> much orphaned by Samsung because they had a broken build. >> >> By far, Honeycomb was probably the worst version of Android ever, and >> I've been using it since 1.0 and remember how bad 2.0 was when it >> first came out on the Droid/Milestone. We can't even deprecate it >> cleanly. >> > > --e89a8fb201e21fbcee04c9ef0bc7--