Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of reinstein.mike@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOFYJNakoUTvb3Qj2wMhmjxG8UEAm47nSLK78EmdA39FT=P8cQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAEeF2TeC0tFHinb2gh2gS6uXCmw8YBrEZuQNxWVyJ_CyMnhC5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyPMKoFGP3bfE=2=zUxGZ+pBxSt5mE=b-5eNwQc56hqQcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOFYJNakoUTvb3Qj2wMhmjxG8UEAm47nSLK78EmdA39FT=P8cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:02:41 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAM-DUcNC37ECB6+KY-ku7vAJdajqcB=6+UaZNX1OLQVfMmUxPA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Better real time communication
From: Mike Reinstein <reinstein.mike@gmail.com>
To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04479f77f59f9904ca10223c

--f46d04479f77f59f9904ca10223c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Jukka,

So is it common practice/OK to have a scribe keep meeting points and bring
them back to a mailing list thread?


On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> > More of an Apache policy than anything. Not sure how strict it is but
> > this one was hammered into us early. (I appreciate the reasoning too.)
> >
> > I personally don't mind as most arch stuff will bubble up here anyhow.
> >
> > Mentors?
>
> It's perfectly fine to discuss project matters also outside the
> mailing list, as long as all significant matters and decisions are
> brought back to the list where everyone has a chance to chime in even
> if they're in a different time zone or otherwise not able to
> participate in real-time discussions.
>
> In practice a good guideline is that you're fine as long as you don't
> encounter situations where you get people asking "Why was this done
> like this?" and the answer is "We decided it in that meeting on IRC /
> phone / etc.". Unless it's a trivial matter (like a simple bug fix
> that doesn't need much background), you should be able to answer such
> questions with a pointer to the list archive or the issue tracker
> where the matter was brought up for discussion. The starting point of
> such a discussion could well be a summary of some real-time meeting
> elsewhere.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>

--f46d04479f77f59f9904ca10223c--