Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3570FDDB5 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 00:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38796 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2012 00:55:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38768 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2012 00:55:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38760 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2012 00:55:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 00:55:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 00:55:40 +0000 Received: by vcbfy27 with SMTP id fy27so3823994vcb.6 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:55:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=08UQ+DnOQhcT0JAMnTXRnzTlZKfc2Ja6YHKMQ9KZTJs=; b=qugSGYD1Ys8/m9UqWl2yc8fYOmawC5rxQzQMN25x0H1LcJtJIap7ATPlqlaPWyFvTw U+/d3D5nalvIJVh6qoRzleHsw8bRHojJwov/7UebWv69srtQILa7Wbc0UT3DJ9luI12a 1g1SwRfRa1kGRYM1XaXbzj27BTvFIRA8XRdBjsDjLmz1E/wBDrdwQ+OYbes+dYje1adZ oQvnQJkG3JGXmkqkCiXcHIyDS6h6f7GJ1v6Q5nCA0kkY77kMbMdn3dJW2VH7umTxCJzL RVR7lYrtkwd2bADvU9DVz6EpD28Lk8x90RyFalSnCGi5c7YyeYvNDB3JNs5h/jB7Uc08 +xng== Received: by 10.220.223.5 with SMTP id ii5mr6878219vcb.51.1346460919342; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:55:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.211.232 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:54:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <119386063229688601@unknownmsgid> From: Shazron Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:54:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Our next release To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 iOS tagged 2.1.0rc2 On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Simon MacDonald wrote: > I picked up the circular JS change and re-ran mob-spec on two versions of > Android. It looked good so I tagged it 2.1.0rc2 and pushed to master. I > will do more detailed testing on Monday. > > Remember at this point we should only be fixing critical bugs. Everything > else can wait until the next release. > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Michael Brooks wrote: > >> Have a good time in Montreal, Simon! We'll look into the circular >> dependency issue and go from there. >> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Simon MacDonald < >> simon.macdonald@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >> > FYI, I don't know if I will get to tag the Android repo today. I'm off to >> > Montreal to visit family in my afternoon time. If someone else wants to >> tag >> > it when the issue with the circular dependency is resolved. If not I'll >> be >> > looking at this Sunday night and I'm working Monday to bank that day for >> > Christmas vacation. That means I'll be testing the hell out of things on >> > Monday. >> > >> > Cheers... >> > >> > Simon Mac Donald >> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Michael Brooks >> > wrote: >> > >> > > I've created CB-1322 [1] to track the progress of tagging 2.1.0rc2. >> > > >> > > I included Windows 8 in the sub-tasks but I wasn't sure if it's being >> > > shipped in the first Apache release. If it isn't, feel free to set the >> > > issues as invalid. >> > > >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1322 >> > > >> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Michael Brooks < >> > michael@michaelbrooks.ca >> > > >wrote: >> > > >> > > > We should be good to tag it, since no one objected yesterday. >> > > > >> > > > I'm going to go ahead and create a "Tag 2.1.0rc2" JIRA task with >> > subtasks >> > > > for each platform. It would be nice to have everything tagged today. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Simon MacDonald < >> > > > simon.macdonald@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> I didn't see the JS repo get tagged are we good to do that? >> > > >> >> > > >> The Android repo is looking good but there is one issue that just >> came >> > > in >> > > >> where the app crashes when a phone call is received. I want to give >> > > that a >> > > >> quick look this morning. >> > > >> >> > > >> Simon Mac Donald >> > > >> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Michael Brooks >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > 2.1.0rc1 : Aug 24th >> > > >> > > 2.1.0rc2 : Aug 30st >> > > >> > > 2.1.0 : Sept 4th ( after Labour day weekend ) >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > As a reminder, 2.1.0rc2 is to be tagged today. Any objections? >> > > >> > >> > > >> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Simon MacDonald >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Correct. Once we tag RC1 by the end of day Friday we will go >> into >> > > bug >> > > >> > > fixing only mode. Then we will tag RC2 on the 31st to which >> there >> > > >> > > should not be any more commits unless there is a critical bug >> fix. >> > > >> > > Release of 2.1 will be September 4th. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Simon Mac Donald >> > > >> > > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Andrew Grieve < >> > > agrieve@chromium.org >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Want to clarify - Once rc1 is tagged, we should be bug fixing >> > > only? >> > > >> > > > FileTransfer abort & onprogress is the main feature-add I have >> > > >> that's >> > > >> > > > ongoing. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Simon MacDonald >> > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> Yup, I will tag the Android repo. >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> Simon Mac Donald >> > > >> > > >> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Joe Bowser < >> bowserj@gmail.com >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > OK, I can't tag this, since I start my PTO on Friday. >> Simon, >> > > can >> > > >> you >> > > >> > > tag? >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > Yay! TLP! >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Brian LeRoux < >> b@brian.io >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Given our board report is due Sept 5 that will work but >> > > >> cutting >> > > >> > it >> > > >> > > >> > >> close!! (Tho if we vett the release candidates >> presumably >> > > its >> > > >> > just >> > > >> > > a >> > > >> > > >> > >> formality.) >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> TLP here we come. =) >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jesse < >> > > >> purplecabbage@gmail.com >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > >> > I can tag Friday, the rest of the week is gone, >> outside >> > > of a >> > > >> > few >> > > >> > > >> hours >> > > >> > > >> > >> > today. >> > > >> > > >> > >> > Still a few cleanup issues I want to resolve for a >> > source >> > > >> > > release. >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > How does this schedule sound? >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > 2.1.0rc1 : Aug 24th >> > > >> > > >> > >> > 2.1.0rc2 : Aug 30st >> > > >> > > >> > >> > 2.1.0 : Sept 4th ( after Labour day weekend ) >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Michael Brooks >> > > >> > > >> > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> I don't mind tagging the RC1, but this week most of >> the >> > > >> Adobe >> > > >> > > team >> > > >> > > >> > will >> > > >> > > >> > >> be >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> part-time at best. >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Bryce Curtis < >> > > >> > > >> > curtis.bryce@gmail.com >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > +1 >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Brian LeRoux < >> > > >> b@brian.io> >> > > >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > Sweet, its just a src release anyhow. Perhaps, if >> > you >> > > >> guys >> > > >> > > feel >> > > >> > > >> > ok >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > doing this, we tag 2.1.0rc1 this wk? >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Shazron >> Abdullah < >> > > >> > > >> > >> shazron@gmail.com> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >> +1 >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >> On 2012-08-17, at 6:23 PM, Simon MacDonald < >> > > >> > > >> > >> simon.macdonald@gmail.com >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>> I'm in favour of an end of August release. >> There >> > > are >> > > >> bug >> > > >> > > >> fixes >> > > >> > > >> > in >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > Android >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>> that need to get out there too. >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>> Simon >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>> On Aug 17, 2012 9:07 PM, "Jesse" < >> > > >> > purplecabbage@gmail.com >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> There were a number of issues with the 2.0.0 >> > > >> > > distribution on >> > > >> > > >> > the >> > > >> > > >> > >> WP7 >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > side, >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> the majority of which I have now resolved. >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> I am wondering how everyone else feels about >> > > either >> > > >> > > >> > distributing >> > > >> > > >> > >> a >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > patched >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> version 2.0.1 or going to 2.1.0. >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> I would rather not wait until the end of Sept, >> > as >> > > is >> > > >> > our >> > > >> > > >> > current >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > timeline >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> for 2.1.0. Seems like a long time for us to >> > leave >> > > >> it >> > > >> > > alone >> > > >> > > >> > when >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > there are >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> urgent fixes near ready to go. How do people >> > feel >> > > >> > about >> > > >> > > a >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> end-of-aug >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> release? >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> Cheers, >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> Jesse >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> -- >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> @purplecabbage >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> risingj.com >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > -- >> > > >> > > >> > >> > @purplecabbage >> > > >> > > >> > >> > risingj.com >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >>