Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3E57DECB for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 02:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20685 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2012 02:42:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 20643 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2012 02:42:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 20635 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2012 02:42:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 02:42:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 02:42:33 +0000 Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so9865643pbc.6 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:42:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=mkc8IDWkO3kzSP9fQAxgjeIy7GMVt6HnHCOUyyWMd6U=; b=E2tCKbnLH0B43Lnxnu8A4dsV/1WYxgyngsN2PAPYKQsdVbP+nX3jf4HCy2WXFueJeB lagb7M1MD923JIYqOJbcuopqxV0Zn6cPO2RTnTTVgCb3i81/jXusVu5lvmK/NecrkHYO DU54h8wUOnIp00nf5pQ1VTS+nKsdvjnVjvIdsF/ym6tNIF2puGl9gA32CI2719eawb3Y /v0SI/v3gfLjJ0LmCh5N9rm0xwxXF3zWgOvPJOTJwF7LfsM7b5XC93PR2vxo1Ns/TfC6 r71a4CcEpOHZjImjDfKLbUvOrwW4XSmo5JGHVcFtav7+mc635YgK7++YMCs3zxijd1hU mQwg== Received: by 10.66.75.105 with SMTP id b9mr23198315paw.58.1347936133051; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:42:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.76.103 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:41:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Shazron Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:41:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Android] Android versioning phase-out (2.1 and 3.x)?? To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Apparently the wifi tablets were only updated last week to ICS (the 3G updates came first). Also, manual update: http://www.androidauthority.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-p7510-android-4-0-4-ics-uelpl-update-official-110369/ On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Shazron wrote: > Verizon just announced today (yes today!): > http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/09/17/verizon-galaxy-tab-10-1-ice-cream-sandwich-update-rolling-out-now/ > > T-mobile announced 2 weeks back: > http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/03/t-mobile-samsung-galaxy-tab-10-1-android-ics-update/ > > Apparently its available in Canada since end of August 2012: > http://www.androidcentral.com/telus-bell-and-rogers-samsung-galaxy-tab-101-andoid-404-updates-now-available > http://communityforums.rogers.com/t5/forums/forumtopicpage/board-id/GeneralCareSupport/message-id/355 > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Simon MacDonald > wrote: >> Me either. My Galaxy 10.1 Tab is still running 3.1. >> >> Simon Mac Donald >> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: >>> Funny, I never got that update. >>> On Sep 17, 2012 5:34 PM, "Anis KADRI" wrote: >>> >>>> Talking about the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Anis KADRI wrote: >>>> >>>> > That was last year and Samsung has updated them to 4.0.3 :-) >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Brion Vibber >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > I would not mind dropping 2.1; our apps for Wikipedia have been 2.2+ >>>> >> anyway >>>> >> > due to breakages in the 2.1 browser. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > 3/3.2 would be slightly sad to miss only because there are Honeycomb >>>> >> > tablets that haven't received ICS updates, including my Galaxy Tab >>>> 10.1 >>>> >> but >>>> >> > ... let's be honest there's not a lot of them out there. I'm not sure >>>> >> how >>>> >> > to blacklist those particular versions in the AndroidManifest however >>>> >> while >>>> >> > still being compatible with 2.2/2.3... >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >> That's a very good point. I'm almost convinced that the 3.1 on >>>> >> Google's dashboard is literally the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 devices >>>> >> that Google gave away at IO a couple of years ago that were pretty >>>> >> much orphaned by Samsung because they had a broken build. >>>> >> >>>> >> By far, Honeycomb was probably the worst version of Android ever, and >>>> >> I've been using it since 1.0 and remember how bad 2.0 was when it >>>> >> first came out on the Droid/Milestone. We can't even deprecate it >>>> >> cleanly. >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>>