Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DC86DEB7 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2944 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2012 10:07:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2660 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2012 10:07:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2636 invoked by uid 99); 21 Sep 2012 10:07:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:07:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dave.c.johnson@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.175] (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:06:54 +0000 Received: by lbky2 with SMTP id y2so408251lbk.6 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 03:06:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=z4rB4203A+K/OL7FVuuu9BqGN55kkUJ/G07CTesLepA=; b=tNKeyiVt4B52vm69g0UavSYFJCoRXr2EOQiuj+po494boaMb+yPFNyugfjOTaSm439 JJqxo9tA5IhpUWOogkLP0njHPaJWxKDozVi786CSCfp06kdP1OcoPazdg1hFHUqfcB7K lm7M0W5dwcPgRgTYvRlreSnSeFmP6SfZLSX5Pb09i1QsyEUy+vIY3b5xJlaNQ0hLAQCC PYHqIx1XCY7TxxD1ifsdx0A1Ofr+FOAOCfkHV75h17g8H8Fkb0l3Zve3VPxFsVBFGE7f untBXqUSI6IbKD61ME0bXqhy0So/0vkkui+uZi9hLxnm7XTKGMRFqnbx8sKkbeXqVjp0 waOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.101.6 with SMTP id fc6mr1523068lbb.110.1348221993582; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 03:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.107.137 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 03:06:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:06:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lower-overhead release process From: Dave Johnson To: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d040172fb01829304ca3365ac --f46d040172fb01829304ca3365ac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Oh and Jukka also mentioned about what the output of the release looks like wrt how developers can use our code in their own software (thinking projects like PhoneGap, worklight, Salesforce hybrid SDK, facebook - jokes! etc). For example, there's currently no clear way for developers to take our code and use the "CordovaView" to embed content in their otherwise native apps. This is probably a different thread / issue for another day but figured I'd raise it anyhow. - d On Friday, September 21, 2012, Dave Johnson wrote: > +1 to CI > > On Friday, September 21, 2012, Jukka Zitting wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Filip Maj wrote: >> > Talking with Anis, CI would solve this problem.. >> >> My favorite topic! There are quite a few CI resources available at >> Apache (see http://ci.apache.org/) and elsewhere (like Travis, >> http://travis-ci.org/), though I'm not sure how well suited they are >> to testing mobile code. >> >> Alternatively, are there already some CI builds for PhoneGap that we >> could leverage also for Cordova? The PhoneGap Build infrastructure >> sounds like it could be adapted also for this purpose. >> >> BR, >> >> Jukka Zitting >> > --f46d040172fb01829304ca3365ac--