Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79277D0B9 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88550 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2012 18:07:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88492 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2012 18:07:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88483 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2012 18:07:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:07:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.171] (HELO mail-wi0-f171.google.com) (209.85.212.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:07:16 +0000 Received: by wibhq4 with SMTP id hq4so2976570wib.0 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:06:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=mMyY1JJnSsGQVZv9QnHqDbKws5xQS2A+iQi7zjSfrnI=; b=yQLg4tkArIUdzthqWXa57Wi030dDEnuMQ8DdnffoH0OHjtD1srPl4Vmh2FG260HICP kLXpU/pTCMSiFXu1LdFICNAYzveJkv5Me7shPGCJfSEnU/vQrc4Dr8r2DcH0B7FPNG+P ZzF8v8X+snX6NzhL7uGdj9aEn30N1ts7FE9PmqBbimIik3PAQKnFkdaKPAQVPKiZfFxz BpyS3qEMaEvrKrlUxvLwHmV+wQBDG+tqBxvDT6IqwYlRvq8PLKBvEtEO26Wb+4x4wwjf yBx3SO4z5AsEY9e0GLpFqDU/E/isqYw5a1EHA0AwSZUIJZMDstqysnVRMOILrJslA4yK SuKA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.153.139 with SMTP id f11mr7918879wek.16.1345486015626; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.57.146 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:06:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <119386063229688601@unknownmsgid> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:06:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Our next release From: Joe Bowser To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org OK, I can't tag this, since I start my PTO on Friday. Simon, can you tag? On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks wrote: > Yay! TLP! > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > >> Given our board report is due Sept 5 that will work but cutting it >> close!! (Tho if we vett the release candidates presumably its just a >> formality.) >> >> TLP here we come. =) >> >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jesse wrote: >> > I can tag Friday, the rest of the week is gone, outside of a few hours >> > today. >> > Still a few cleanup issues I want to resolve for a source release. >> > >> > How does this schedule sound? >> > >> > 2.1.0rc1 : Aug 24th >> > 2.1.0rc2 : Aug 30st >> > 2.1.0 : Sept 4th ( after Labour day weekend ) >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Michael Brooks >> > wrote: >> > >> >> I don't mind tagging the RC1, but this week most of the Adobe team will >> be >> >> part-time at best. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Bryce Curtis > >> >wrote: >> >> >> >> > +1 >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> >> > > Sweet, its just a src release anyhow. Perhaps, if you guys feel ok >> >> > > doing this, we tag 2.1.0rc1 this wk? >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Shazron Abdullah < >> shazron@gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> +1 >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On 2012-08-17, at 6:23 PM, Simon MacDonald < >> simon.macdonald@gmail.com >> >> > >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >>> I'm in favour of an end of August release. There are bug fixes in >> >> > Android >> >> > >>> that need to get out there too. >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> Simon >> >> > >>> On Aug 17, 2012 9:07 PM, "Jesse" wrote: >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>>> There were a number of issues with the 2.0.0 distribution on the >> WP7 >> >> > side, >> >> > >>>> the majority of which I have now resolved. >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> I am wondering how everyone else feels about either distributing >> a >> >> > patched >> >> > >>>> version 2.0.1 or going to 2.1.0. >> >> > >>>> I would rather not wait until the end of Sept, as is our current >> >> > timeline >> >> > >>>> for 2.1.0. Seems like a long time for us to leave it alone when >> >> > there are >> >> > >>>> urgent fixes near ready to go. How do people feel about a >> >> end-of-aug >> >> > >>>> release? >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> Cheers, >> >> > >>>> Jesse >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> -- >> >> > >>>> @purplecabbage >> >> > >>>> risingj.com >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > @purplecabbage >> > risingj.com >>