Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of stevengill97@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADVgkyOBULi3g3JXxE8T7A3-Eb1ZNuxNpud31ibmKMFu8ND=Ag@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADVgkyPLhjJiuOVNt+be=QapC0e4B3jAr9kNaXVZGKa8q4vjpw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-a=__OitTdOeu3kUYq+r-BxhJoOkSxMV1kEM-ftXKY+5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADVgkyOBULi3g3JXxE8T7A3-Eb1ZNuxNpud31ibmKMFu8ND=Ag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:33:33 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAMSbhBh_nSAbDeGOGMqV4ZYNNSrYaKWQrreObx18fvH_jd_3mg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: cutting our first official apache release
To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340deffd729604c754aecc

--14dae9340deffd729604c754aecc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

There would be the whole business of signing the individual archives as
well (easy). I figure the release would look like the src folder that coho
used to make http://people.apache.org/~steven/cordova-1.9.0-src/. We should
figure out if we want to also include cordovajs repo in the source.


On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:

> From my understanding it would literally bit a git archive of a tag of
> the repo w/ no rejigging. (And Coho becomes a tool for distribution
> authors like PhoneGap, AppMobi, etc.)
>
> Jukka/Ross: is that assumption correct?
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > iOS should be good to go regarding "source only", the docs have been
> > updated regarding command-line install.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> >> I'd like for us to aim to cut an Apache Cordova release. The idea
> >> we're bouncing now is that our Apache releases are source only
> >> packages and we save the binary releases for downstream projects (like
> >> that phonegap thing you may have heard of). This should decouple
> >> release woe, aka coho, from the framework authoring concerns.
> >>
> >> Our next apache board report is dues Sept 5th --- and having a release
> >> ready to go for that date would be admirable but maybe too soon?
> >>
> >> (We have in the past tended to hold off until end of September for the
> >> next point release after our last sprint.)
> >>
> >> This would give us the final checkmarks to achieve TLP status which
> >> would be cool to do for our one year Apache incubation anniversary. =)
>

--14dae9340deffd729604c754aecc--