Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8DE8D092 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78600 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2012 18:04:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78580 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2012 18:04:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78572 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2012 18:04:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:04:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:04:28 +0000 Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so8317001pbc.6 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:04:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=v6uP0HPUacp6kjl4zbRdTYHXA0zML3gKrjbC20uOCLU=; b=vs3OKrg6IDfEYmPTUm2z5dyXGstjYr5JMcACay/vVdjAY7TQfJtDv0FKYERXGxLIEw YalEngcVVxnkBosPf5HYB2mPOkYwS2lbJ43s1hQkjrPomBuzdAARTpyciJ7iWfoFbdaO CfYKV96ojHskwttERgYygWw8BUR9MFkQ4Gy75U7pDTALFmge/LuW9NNJUo3oR61tS+3u wOuLcOP2kxEc9BoEv51g4WlP7BrQfG2x1evAkwKyi1XUzTJBT3+Sn5EOGqFP+benG3Kb WEVrsg2UJU4MYBYvZcpghcFoyZQbQNKH/fps1MKhc2jY/T0JmPRqGVvcbXRMhRQvTrKz Vp5w== Received: by 10.68.194.229 with SMTP id hz5mr33902573pbc.86.1345485847321; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:04:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.49.135 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:03:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <119386063229688601@unknownmsgid> From: Shazron Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:03:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Our next release To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Michael Brooks wrote: > +1 Jesse's release schedule > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jesse wrote: > >> I can tag Friday, the rest of the week is gone, outside of a few hours >> today. >> Still a few cleanup issues I want to resolve for a source release. >> >> How does this schedule sound? >> >> 2.1.0rc1 : Aug 24th >> 2.1.0rc2 : Aug 30st >> 2.1.0 : Sept 4th ( after Labour day weekend ) >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Michael Brooks >> wrote: >> >> > I don't mind tagging the RC1, but this week most of the Adobe team will >> be >> > part-time at best. >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Bryce Curtis > > >wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> > > > Sweet, its just a src release anyhow. Perhaps, if you guys feel ok >> > > > doing this, we tag 2.1.0rc1 this wk? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Shazron Abdullah > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> +1 >> > > >> >> > > >> On 2012-08-17, at 6:23 PM, Simon MacDonald < >> simon.macdonald@gmail.com >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> I'm in favour of an end of August release. There are bug fixes in >> > > Android >> > > >>> that need to get out there too. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Simon >> > > >>> On Aug 17, 2012 9:07 PM, "Jesse" wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> There were a number of issues with the 2.0.0 distribution on the >> WP7 >> > > side, >> > > >>>> the majority of which I have now resolved. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> I am wondering how everyone else feels about either distributing a >> > > patched >> > > >>>> version 2.0.1 or going to 2.1.0. >> > > >>>> I would rather not wait until the end of Sept, as is our current >> > > timeline >> > > >>>> for 2.1.0. Seems like a long time for us to leave it alone when >> > > there are >> > > >>>> urgent fixes near ready to go. How do people feel about a >> > end-of-aug >> > > >>>> release? >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Thoughts? >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Cheers, >> > > >>>> Jesse >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> -- >> > > >>>> @purplecabbage >> > > >>>> risingj.com >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> @purplecabbage >> risingj.com >>