incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Brooks <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Our next release
Date Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:00:23 GMT
We should be good to tag it, since no one objected yesterday.

I'm going to go ahead and create a "Tag 2.1.0rc2" JIRA task with subtasks
for each platform. It would be nice to have everything tagged today.

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Simon MacDonald
<simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:

> I didn't see the JS repo get tagged are we good to do that?
>
> The Android repo is looking good but there is one issue that just came in
> where the app crashes when a phone call is received. I want to give that a
> quick look this morning.
>
> Simon Mac Donald
> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Michael Brooks
> <michael@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote:
>
> > >
> > > 2.1.0rc1 : Aug 24th
> > > 2.1.0rc2 : Aug 30st
> > > 2.1.0 : Sept 4th ( after Labour day weekend )
> >
> >
> > As a reminder, 2.1.0rc2 is to be tagged today. Any objections?
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Simon MacDonald
> > <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > Correct. Once we tag RC1 by the end of day Friday we will go into bug
> > > fixing only mode. Then we will tag RC2 on the 31st to which there
> > > should not be any more commits unless there is a critical bug fix.
> > > Release of 2.1 will be September 4th.
> > >
> > > Simon Mac Donald
> > > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Want to clarify - Once rc1 is tagged, we should be bug fixing only?
> > > > FileTransfer abort & onprogress is the main feature-add I have that's
> > > > ongoing.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Simon MacDonald
> > > > <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Yup, I will tag the Android repo.
> > > >>
> > > >> Simon Mac Donald
> > > >> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > OK, I can't tag this, since I start my PTO on Friday. Simon,
can
> you
> > > tag?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks
> > > >> > <michael@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote:
> > > >> > > Yay! TLP!
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> Given our board report is due Sept 5 that will work
but cutting
> > it
> > > >> > >> close!! (Tho if we vett the release candidates presumably
its
> > just
> > > a
> > > >> > >> formality.)
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> TLP here we come. =)
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jesse <
> purplecabbage@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >> > I can tag Friday, the rest of the week is gone,
outside of a
> > few
> > > >> hours
> > > >> > >> > today.
> > > >> > >> > Still a few cleanup issues I want to resolve for
a source
> > > release.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > How does this schedule sound?
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > 2.1.0rc1 : Aug 24th
> > > >> > >> > 2.1.0rc2 : Aug 30st
> > > >> > >> > 2.1.0 : Sept 4th ( after Labour day weekend )
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Michael Brooks
> > > >> > >> > <michael@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote:
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >> I don't mind tagging the RC1, but this week
most of the
> Adobe
> > > team
> > > >> > will
> > > >> > >> be
> > > >> > >> >> part-time at best.
> > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > >> >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Bryce Curtis
<
> > > >> > curtis.bryce@gmail.com
> > > >> > >> >> >wrote:
> > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > >> >> > +1
> > > >> > >> >> >
> > > >> > >> >> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Brian
LeRoux <b@brian.io
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >> >> > > Sweet, its just a src release anyhow.
Perhaps, if you
> guys
> > > feel
> > > >> > ok
> > > >> > >> >> > > doing this, we tag 2.1.0rc1 this
wk?
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:27 PM,
Shazron Abdullah <
> > > >> > >> shazron@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >> >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >> >> > >> +1
> > > >> > >> >> > >>
> > > >> > >> >> > >> On 2012-08-17, at 6:23 PM, Simon
MacDonald <
> > > >> > >> simon.macdonald@gmail.com
> > > >> > >> >> >
> > > >> > >> >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >> >> > >>
> > > >> > >> >> > >>> I'm in favour of an end of
August release. There are
> bug
> > > >> fixes
> > > >> > in
> > > >> > >> >> > Android
> > > >> > >> >> > >>> that need to get out there
too.
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>
> > > >> > >> >> > >>> Simon
> > > >> > >> >> > >>> On Aug 17, 2012 9:07 PM,
"Jesse" <
> > purplecabbage@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> There were a number of
issues with the 2.0.0
> > > distribution on
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > >> WP7
> > > >> > >> >> > side,
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> the majority of which
I have now resolved.
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>>
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> I am wondering how everyone
else feels about either
> > > >> > distributing
> > > >> > >> a
> > > >> > >> >> > patched
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> version 2.0.1 or going
to 2.1.0.
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> I would rather not wait
until the end of Sept, as is
> > our
> > > >> > current
> > > >> > >> >> > timeline
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> for 2.1.0.  Seems like
a long time for us to leave it
> > > alone
> > > >> > when
> > > >> > >> >> > there are
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> urgent fixes near ready
to go.  How do people feel
> > about
> > > a
> > > >> > >> >> end-of-aug
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> release?
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>>
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> Thoughts?
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>>
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> Cheers,
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>>  Jesse
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>>
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> --
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> @purplecabbage
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>> risingj.com
> > > >> > >> >> > >>>>
> > > >> > >> >> >
> > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > --
> > > >> > >> > @purplecabbage
> > > >> > >> > risingj.com
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message