incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: [Android] loadUrl, input methods and making the web a thread-safe place
Date Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:02:12 GMT
I've been updating status on this bug:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-638

At least another week worth of work to do to make the options stable enough
to switch over to them.


On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

> Did the options get implemented? Coming back to the code after a month it
> looks like you guys overhauled a lot of stuff :)
>
> On 8/13/12 6:22 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
> >wrote:
> >> Calling the private sendMessages() to eval JS doesn't have the same with
> >> dismissing the keyboard, although it's quite possible that it will have
> >> other bugs. If nothing else, I think it would be neat to add it as
> >> togglable options so devs can try it out and see if it causes any bugs.
> >> Another risk is that the added WEBKIT_DRAW that seems to be required
> >>will
> >> make it slower than other options.
> >>
> >> Instead of online/offline events, we could turn polling on when a
> >>textbox
> >> is focused and turn it off when it blurs. This might increase typing lag
> >> though... I'm also not how straight-forward it is to detect if the
> >>keyboard
> >> is active due to ContentEditable.
> >>
> >> Joe, I'm sure you looked at this when it came up with the 2.3 emulator,
> >>but
> >> is there a way to detect that you're in the emulator?
> >>
> >
> >That's not as simple as it sounds, we have to check which emulator its
> >running.  I'm sure the emulator has device information in it and we
> >can grab that using our existing device API.  Of course, I didn't do
> >this because there may be that crappy knock-off phone out there that
> >also runs JSC as its Javascript Engine. We created the fix with the
> >assumption that there were these Chinese OEMs who may be creating
> >cheap, crappy phones which may be using JSC instead of V8 for their
> >Javascript Engines and that these OEMs would use Gingerbread.
> >
> >BTW: We haven't seen a real phone running 2.3 with JSC as its
> >Javascript Engine.  It is plausible, but it would fail the Google
> >Tests.
> >
> >Joe
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message