incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <>
Subject Re: [iOS] Postponement of ARC support in 2.0
Date Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:29:05 GMT
K. That's essentially what this boils down to: semver hangover. People
just _assume_ that's how any project now rolls.

On 7/10/12 3:20 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <> wrote:

>Oh agree completely, if we assign meaning (like majors meaning an API
>change) then sure it effects it. I think is mostly a hangover from
>semver thinking --- and increasingly thinking that semver not the
>right fit for this proj. We have too many dependencies on outside libs
>to formalize deprecation to a 1 year cycle.
>On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Filip Maj <> wrote:
>>>One thing I'd like to add: cadence has nothing to do w/ deprecation
>>>policy. Shipping on a regular heartbeat is a completely different
>>>concern from the actual artifacts being shipped.
>> Well, the two are interconnected. If we ship a point release every
>> and state that we have a deprecation policy of 6 months, that means we
>> break an API 6 point releases or so after deciding an API is deprecated.
>> So these don't necessarily line up with landing breaking changes in
>> releases.

View raw message