incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon MacDonald <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Android] Lifecycle Utility Methods
Date Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:51:14 GMT
If Eclipse was a person I would have killed it today. The
most satisfying thing I could do was quit the app.

Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald


On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK, I re-write the refactor.  Tip: Make sure you stash or commit
> something otherwise Eclipse will automagically overwrite it for you.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > Update: looks like Eclipse axed Joe's code for this branch. Sad pandas
> all
> > around.
> >
> > On 7/24/12 4:00 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Hey
> >>
> >>Users have started using the CordovaWebView, and they have discovered
> >>that for the majority of Android plugins, that we have to implement
> >>handling of the Android Lifecycle.  This is a major downside since
> >>most people don't know how the Android Activity Lifecycle works, since
> >>we've been abstracting that in the DroidGap Activity for years.
> >>Here's the docs for more info on that:
> >>
> http://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/Activity.html#ActivityL
> >>ifecycle
> >>
> >>While we expect that people using this component would be somewhat
> >>comfortable with Android, they shouldn't have to be comfortable with
> >>reading DroidGap.java and copypasting things from it, so I created
> >>utility methods and refactored this into CordovaWebView.  Here's my
> >>repo which has the example.
> >>
> >>Does this make sense? I'm changing a very important part of the code
> >>here, and I'd like feedback before putting this in.
> >>
> >>https://github.com/infil00p/callback-android/tree/utility_method
> >>
> >>Joe
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message