incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: config.xml - CB-888
Date Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:10:02 GMT
For iOS:
+1 transition period.
+1 to changing Cordova.plist (which contains the whitelist, plugin
info, and app settings) into config.xml

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Simon MacDonald
<simon.macdonald@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 transition period.
> +1 to combining plugins.xml and cordova.xml into config.xml
>
> Simon Mac Donald
> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Michael Brooks
> <michael@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote:
>> +1 transition period.
>> +1 using build.phonegap.com/ docs as a reference point.
>>
>> We should take steps to feed out experiences and input back into the W3C
>> Community Group (Native Web group) and eventually see it pushed into the
>> main W3C Widget Configuration Document.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 transition period.
>>>
>>> But yes Joe, essentially plugins.xml + cordova.xml -> config.xml.
>>>
>>> We should definitely have a discussion about formatting! Starting point in
>>> my mind would be build.phonegap.com docs for their use of config.xml. Off
>>> the top of my head and from 35,000 feet:
>>>
>>> - <plugin> elements from plugins.xml map to <feature> elements in
W3C
>>> config.xml.
>>> - <access> elements from cordova.xml already follow the <access>
element
>>> in config.xml.
>>> - same for <preference>
>>>
>>> P.S. BlackBerry WebWorks already does all of this so we get it "for free."
>>>
>>> On 7/9/12 4:25 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
>>>
>>> >thinking we should add support for config.xml before we remove
>>> >anything...have a transition period ala deprecation policy
>>> >
>>> >On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hey
>>> >>
>>> >> Are we just merging the blacklist and the cordova.xml to make it one
>>> >> config.xml, or are we having a discussion about the format?   Given
>>> >> the timeframe for this release, is this something that we want to have
>>> >> for 2.0?
>>> >>
>>> >> Joe
>>>
>>>

Mime
View raw message