incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Laurent Hasson <>
Subject RE: [ATTN MENTOR] Re: DISCUSS: Ripple as a sub-project of Cordova
Date Sun, 22 Jul 2012 17:02:36 GMT

I had suggested that because of my prior involvement many years ago with the Lucene project
and its sub-project structure including Solr. This was many years ago, so if this is an obsolete
structure, I am fine. The reason for the thinking though was simply that Ripple would have
a strong "Cordova" support in terms of API emulation and relate closely to that project. We
can of course discuss this in the community to figure out the best option. Any reason why
sub-projects are frowned upon?

As for the statement "the entire company is focused on our BB10 delivery", it was meant only
to highlight that moving Ripple to Apache may take a bit longer to do as a result, not that
there was any less commitment to Ripple from our site. Quite the contrary.

Thank You
- LDH (Laurent Hasson)                         -
- Technical Director, BlackBerry Web Platform  -
- Research In Motion                           -
- Email:                       -
- Mobile: 646-460-7066                         -
- Twitter: @ldhasson                           -
"Strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government"
- Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Gardler [] 
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: [ATTN MENTOR] Re: DISCUSS: Ripple as a sub-project of Cordova

On 21 July 2012 15:14, Filip Maj <> wrote:
> I am very excited about this!
> The cordova suite of projects have never addressed emulation and my go-to
> has always been Ripple.
> If there is anything I can do to help please let me know.
> Mentors (Jukka?): other than setting up a repository, do you foresee any
> issues with moving ahead with this?

The ASF does not encourage sub-projects. I'd like to hear why the
proposal for this to be a subproject of Cordova rather than a podling
in its own right?

I'm also a little concerned about the statement "and the entire
company is focused on our BB10 delivery." This implies that RIM is no
longer interested in actively developing the code. The ASF is not a
place for code-dumps. However, it is entirely possible that I'm
reading too much into that half-sentence, it is also possible that
there is sufficient momentum behind the project to make it a viable
community without RIM.


This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged
material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges),
or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please
immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination,
distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized
and may be unlawful.

View raw message