incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ken Wallis <kwal...@rim.com>
Subject RE: FileTransfer vs XHR2 - Should we keep improving FileTransfer?
Date Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:56:44 GMT
Sorry for a small hijack, but anyone know how I could get in touch with Alexis about potential
additions to those tables? ;)
--

Ken Wallis

Product Manager – BlackBerry WebWorks

Research In Motion

(905) 629-4746 x14369

________________________________________
From: brian.leroux@gmail.com [brian.leroux@gmail.com] on behalf of Brian LeRoux [b@brian.io]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 1:51 PM
To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: FileTransfer vs XHR2 - Should we keep improving FileTransfer?

It needs to stay for now; does no harm. Looks like xhr2 basically
everywhere http://caniuse.com/xhr2
On Jul 26, 2012 10:47 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

> As much as I would like to see it gone, it is a necessity at this point.
> How to upload binary files, for example? Need to make sure we cover our
> users' core use cases, binary upload being one of them.
>
> Agree with Jesse that would also need to see the viability of moving to
> xhr2 across our supported platforms.
>
> I am leaning towards keeping it around for now (maybe discussing a
> deprecation plan, and how to replace it with other structs), but would
> love to see it gone. What would we need to do to get rid of it long-term?
>
> On 7/26/12 10:17 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I don't see polyfillin this as an easy feat.
> >How can we implement ArrayBuffer?
> >Also, without web workers, file transfers would block the ui thread,
> >or am I missing something?
> >I think we need to go a little further into the 'how' before we can
> >see if it makes sense.
> >
> >Personally I think there will always be a place for the FileTransfer
> >API as it is simple and dedicated.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >  Jesse
> >
> >
> >On 2012-07-26, at 9:42 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey
> >>
> >> There are a lot of requests to improve file transfer to support
> >> multiple files, and have the same header format on upload and
> >> download.  I know that Andrew has been doing work on it, but I want to
> >> know if we should take on the multiple file ticket (CB-200), or if
> >> we're going to deprecate this and go with XHR2 for our File
> >> Upload/Download needs.  I'm assuming moving to XHR2 will require
> >> polyfilling it on Android 2.x, which is fine, but I kind of want to
> >> see some movement on this, since I don't want to give people this as a
> >> First Ticket just to have it deprecated.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Joe
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged
material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges),
or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please
immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination,
distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized
and may be unlawful.

Mime
View raw message