Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07521CF85 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14053 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2012 18:29:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14029 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2012 18:29:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14018 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2012 18:29:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:29:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fil@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.191] (HELO exprod6og106.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:29:37 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob106.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT+3z+za2lSO8cexP/+ASwYOXc8RNgxKx@postini.com; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:29:17 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q5TIQtJ0028589 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nahub01.corp.adobe.com (nahub01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.97]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q5TITDYr019127 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.97]) with mapi; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:29:17 -0700 From: Filip Maj To: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:30:54 -0700 Subject: Re: [Android] Do we need to manage our own history? Thread-Topic: [Android] Do we need to manage our own history? Thread-Index: Ac1WJRemjQ6Z5SbgRoqhev9zUZMweg== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.2.120421 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 If built-in history cuts it then yeah, I'm all for deprecating/removing. On 6/29/12 11:26 AM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: >Now that I merged in the fix for params on Android 4.0.x (need to test >if this bug is fixed in 4.1), I want to see if we can remove our >Android history and the handling, since this is a lot of fragile code >that I would prefer to have deprecated. It'd be nice to do this in >2.0 > >Any thoughts on this? > >Joe