incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: release 1.8.1
Date Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:18:40 GMT
I think that's it then! Thanks all

On 6/13/12 10:15 AM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:

>WP7 has been tagged 1.8.1
>
>On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Michael Brooks
><michael@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote:
>
>> Docs are tagged. As a note - we will now need upgrade guides for 1.8.0
>>=>
>> 1.8.1
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Tim Kim <timkim85@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Tagged
>> >
>> > On 12 June 2012 15:03, Anis KADRI <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > TAGGED!
>> > > ok let's keep doing it this way then. it's a bit overkill but it's
>> easier
>> > > to keep track.
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Herm Wong
>><kingoftheoaks@hotmail.com
>> > > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > webos has been tagged 1.8.1
>> > > >
>> > > > > From: fil@adobe.com
>> > > > > To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > > Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:41:37 -0700
>> > > > > Subject: Re: release 1.8.1
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Yep that was my initial suggestion
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 6/12/12 2:32 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.kadri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >So looks like we'll be tagging every platform to 1.8.1
>> > > > > >What about future releases ? if an issue strikes a specific
>> platform
>> > > > (say
>> > > > > >iOS or Android) should we always tag all platforms to a new
>> version
>> > > > number
>> > > > > >?
>> > > > > >I think we should do it since we distribute everything as
a
>>single
>> > > > > >package.
>> > > > > >I believe that tagging platforms separately only makes sense
>>if we
>> > > > decide
>> > > > > >to distribute them as separate packages. Thoughts ?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> iOS passes all tests and tagged 1.8.1
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Joe Bowser
>><bowserj@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >> > Android Tagged.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > All pre-1.9 work will happen on 1.8.1pre branch.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >> Js tagged!
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> On 6/12/12 10:53 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >OK, Waiting for the 1.8.1 tag on cordova-js
then :P
>> > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >+1
>> > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Filip
Maj
>><fil@adobe.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> I'll reiterate, my vote is to just
tag 1.8.1. In the
>>other
>> > > > thread
>> > > > > >>we
>> > > > > >> >> >>did a
>> > > > > >> >> >> full circle on possible release types
:)
>> > > > > >> >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> On 6/12/12 10:42 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >Not really sure where we are with
this. Looks like
>>there
>> is
>> > > > > >>friction
>> > > > > >> >> >> >with updating *all* platforms
to tag 1.8.1 (like the
>>way
>> we
>> > > did
>> > > > > >> >> >> >before). I'd say tag cordova-js
1.8.1 to the same tag
>>as
>> > > 1.8.0.
>> > > > > >>Then
>> > > > > >> >> >> >iOS updates and tags to 1.8.1.
Source is fine - but
>> binary
>> > > > > >> >> >> >distribution, dunno. The reason
cordova-js has to be
>> tagged
>> > > > > >>1.8.1 is
>> > > > > >> >> >> >because the cordova-js in a new
project will be called
>> > > > > >> >> >> >cordova-1.8.1.js, and if it is
not tagged, it will be
>> > > > confusing.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:36
AM, Joe Bowser <
>> > > > bowserj@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >> >> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >> So, where are we with this?
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:29
PM, Brian LeRoux <
>> > b@brian.io>
>> > > > > >>wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> The benefit of version
numbers to track bugs which
>>is
>> > > pretty
>> > > > > >> useful
>> > > > > >> >> >>I
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> think! =) I've just assumed
we'd want to
>>synchronize
>> the
>> > > > > >> cordova-js
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> version number to the
native code as a rule of
>>thumb
>> for
>> > > > > >>sanity.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> Is that assumption incorrect?
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012
at 4:13 PM, Jesse
>> > > > > >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >> >> >> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > I agree with Anis,
if I we are going through your
>> > > proposal
>> > > > > >> Brian,
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>there
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> is
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > little to no benefit
over updating everything.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > In my estimation,
the iOS fix will not require an
>> > update
>> > > > to
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>cordova-js,
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > which may be our
line in the sand. If cordova-js
>> need
>> > to
>> > > > be
>> > > > > >> >> >>rebuilt
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>to
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > address an issue,
then we will probably always
>>have
>> > the
>> > > > full
>> > > > > >> >> >>cascade
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>of
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > rebuilds+retags+hoopla.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > On Mon, Jun 11,
2012 at 4:06 PM, Anis KADRI <
>> > > > > >> anis.kadri@gmail.com
>> > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> Is cordova-js
updated in this particular case ?
>> > Because
>> > > > if
>> > > > > >>it
>> > > > > >> is,
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>the
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> platforms that
use it can just be tagged 1.8.1
>>and
>> we
>> > > > ship
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> phonegap-1.8.1.zip
(just simpler).
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> On Mon, Jun
11, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Brian LeRoux <
>> > > > b@brian.io>
>> > > > > >> >> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > Well, here's
the proposal again.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 1. We ship
a package and it is titled
>> > > > phonegap-1.8.x.zip
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 2. Inside
that package we have files. Those
>>files
>> > are
>> > > > > >> >> >>explicitly
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > *-1.8.*.*
(cordova-js would need a tag for
>>1.8.1
>> > for
>> > > > > >> projects
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>that use
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > it..)
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 3. We update
the download with PATCH updates
>>as
>> > they
>> > > > come
>> > > > > >> on a
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > platform
by platform basis (as needed).
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > This could
get messy given the shared
>>dependency
>> of
>> > > > > >> cordova-js.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > On Mon,
Jun 11, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Jesse
>> > > > > >> >> >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > I
only added the patch level on the
>>assumption
>> > that
>> > > > it
>> > > > > >> might
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>happen
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> again
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > before
1.9.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > But
I can live without it.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > On
Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Brian
>>LeRoux
>> > > > > >><b@brian.io
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
I'd like to propose we take jesses
>>suggestion
>> > but
>> > > > with
>> > > > > >> the
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>tweak
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> that
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
we do not add a new patch level. The
>> downstream
>> > > > > >> distribution
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>would
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
just read:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
phonegap-1.8.x.zip
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
wherein the ios distrib would be based on
>> 1.8.1
>> > > and
>> > > > > >>all
>> > > > > >> >> >>others
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> based
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> on
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
1.8.0
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
I feel this is maintainable and easiest on
>> > > > > >>implementors
>> > > > > >> for
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> platforms
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
that do not need to rock a patch tag.
>> Thoughts?
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Joe Bowser
>> > > > > >> >> >><bowserj@gmail.com
>> > > > > >> >> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> Android will not be merging 1.8.1 back
>>into
>> > > > master,
>> > > > > >> since
>> > > > > >> >> >>it
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> will be
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
based
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> on 1.8.0 pre-CordovaWebView.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Michael
>> > Brooks
>> > > <
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
michael@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > Hmm.. Can we have multiple tags in git
>> > > pointing
>> > > > > >>to
>> > > > > >> the
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>same
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> commit?
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
This
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > way we COULD tag all platforms, but
>> non-ios
>> > > > > >> platforms'
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>1.8.1
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> just
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
points
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > to the same commit as 1.8.0.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> Yes, a tag is just a reference to a SHA.
>> > > However,
>> > > > > >>we
>> > > > > >> >> >>still
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>need
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> to
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
update
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> the VERSION file for each platform.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> All platforms but iOS should be able to
>> > branch
>> > > > off
>> > > > > >> 1.8.0,
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>update
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
code,
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> and merge it back:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git checkout -b 1.8.0 new-release`
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - update the version to 1.8.1
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git commit -am "Version 1.8.1"
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git tag 1.8.1`
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git checkout master`
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git merge new-release`
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git branch -d new-release`
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git push origin`
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> Am I missing something?
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Filip
>>Maj
>> > > > > >> >> >><fil@adobe.com>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > Hmm.. Can we have multiple tags in git
>> > > pointing
>> > > > > >>to
>> > > > > >> the
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>same
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> commit?
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
This
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > way we COULD tag all platforms, but
>> non-ios
>> > > > > >> platforms'
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>1.8.1
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> just
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
points
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > to the same commit as 1.8.0.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > On 6/11/12 2:41 PM, "Jesse" <
>> > > > > >> purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >I still think we should serve the new
>> > > > > >> updated+package
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > distribution,
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
just
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >not modify platforms that do not have
>> > > changes.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >Call it a hotfix ...
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:38 PM,
>>Filip
>> Maj
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> The thing is that the downstream
>> > > > distribution
>> > > > > >>of
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>cordova
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > (phonegap)
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> gets
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> *a lot* of exposure/downloads via a
>> > single
>> > > > > >> archive
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> containing
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > all
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>platform
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> implementations.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> Tagging a 1.8.1 or 1.8.0.1 on a
>>single
>> > > > > >>platform
>> > > > > >> and
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> blogging
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > about
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
it
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> would probably work for the (small)
>> user
>> > > > base
>> > > > > >> that
>> > > > > >> >> >>is
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> involved
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > on
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
the
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> issue tracker+mailing list, and is
>> > > > comfortable
>> > > > > >> with
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>git,
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> etc.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
However
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>for
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> the vast majority of users these
>>are
>> all
>> > > > > >>"hoops"
>> > > > > >> >> >>they
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> to
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> go
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> through
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> and, in light of a latest point
>> release
>> > > > > >>crashing
>> > > > > >> for
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>them
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > already,
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> probably would just add to their
>> > > > frustration.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> If we want to be up front and
>>honest
>> > about
>> > > > the
>> > > > > >> issue
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>and
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> how
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> to
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > fix
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> it,
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>as
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> well as provide as simple a
>>solution
>> to
>> > > > people
>> > > > > >> who
>> > > > > >> >> >>may
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > fallen
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> into
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> the issue in the first place, I am
>>of
>> > the
>> > > > > >> opinion we
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>should
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> tag
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
1.8.1
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> across the board, blog about it
>>_AND_
>> > host
>> > > > up
>> > > > > >> >> >>another
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>dist.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> Would love to hear what non-Adobe
>> folks
>> > > have
>> > > > > >>to
>> > > > > >> say
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>about
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> this.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> On 6/11/12 2:30 PM, "Jesse"
>> > > > > >> >> >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >Before I tip my hand on a vote ...
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >Is there any chance of a middle
>> ground
>> > > > here?
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >Updating all platforms to 1.8.1
>>for
>> the
>> > > > > >>benefit
>> > > > > >> of
>> > > > > >> >> >>one
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> platform
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
seems
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>like
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >a lot of overhead to address a
>>change
>> > in
>> > > > one.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >Could we adopt packaging a
>> 1.8.0.1.zip
>> > > > which
>> > > > > >> would
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>include
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> updated
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>iOS
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >code, and iOS code tags, but no
>> changes
>> > > to
>> > > > > >>the
>> > > > > >> >> >>other
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > platforms?
or
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >something similar?
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >Of course this would require
>>adding a
>> > > > little
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> documentation to
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > the
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>release,
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >to say what was addressed, and
>>what
>> > > > platforms
>> > > > > >> were
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> changed,
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> but
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
still
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >considerably easier than the
>> > tag->domino
>> > > > > >>effect
>> > > > > >> we
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> now.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > IMO
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:18 PM,
>> Filip
>> > > Maj
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> +1 release 1.8.1
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> On 6/11/12 2:15 PM, "Brian
>>LeRoux"
>> <
>> > > > > >> b@brian.io>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >So we have a fairly big issue
>>in
>> iOS
>> > > 1.8
>> > > > > >> >> >>wherein a
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> PhoneGap
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
app is
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >crashing if the user swipes
>>down
>> the
>> > > > > >> >> >>notification
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> centre
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > while
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>in-app.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >The question is whether this
>>is a
>> > bug
>> > > > big
>> > > > > >> >> >>enough to
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> cut an
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
1.8.1
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >official release for all
>>platforms
>> > or
>> > > if
>> > > > > >> >> >>pointing
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> users to
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > the
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> minor
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >tag is enough.
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >[+1] release 1.8.1
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >[ -1] do not release 1.8.1
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >I think a tag should suffice
>>but
>> if
>> > > > > >> implementors
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> no
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
trouble
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >tagging a release then we
>>might as
>> > > well
>> > > > > >>save
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>Shaz/Becky
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >email/twitter complaint!
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >--
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >@purplecabbage
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >risingj.com
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >--
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >@purplecabbage
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >risingj.com
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > --
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > @purplecabbage
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > risingj.com
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > --
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > @purplecabbage
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > risingj.com
>> > > > > >> >> >> >>>
>> > > > > >> >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> >>
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Timothy Kim
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>--
>@purplecabbage
>risingj.com


Mime
View raw message