incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Brooks <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca>
Subject Re: release 1.8.1
Date Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:49:19 GMT
Docs are tagged. As a note - we will now need upgrade guides for 1.8.0 =>
1.8.1

Michael

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Tim Kim <timkim85@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tagged
>
> On 12 June 2012 15:03, Anis KADRI <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > TAGGED!
> > ok let's keep doing it this way then. it's a bit overkill but it's easier
> > to keep track.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Herm Wong <kingoftheoaks@hotmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > webos has been tagged 1.8.1
> > >
> > > > From: fil@adobe.com
> > > > To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:41:37 -0700
> > > > Subject: Re: release 1.8.1
> > > >
> > > > Yep that was my initial suggestion
> > > >
> > > > On 6/12/12 2:32 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >So looks like we'll be tagging every platform to 1.8.1
> > > > >What about future releases ? if an issue strikes a specific platform
> > > (say
> > > > >iOS or Android) should we always tag all platforms to a new version
> > > number
> > > > >?
> > > > >I think we should do it since we distribute everything as a single
> > > > >package.
> > > > >I believe that tagging platforms separately only makes sense if we
> > > decide
> > > > >to distribute them as separate packages. Thoughts ?
> > > > >
> > > > >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> iOS passes all tests and tagged 1.8.1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > Android Tagged.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > All pre-1.9 work will happen on 1.8.1pre branch.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> Js tagged!
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> On 6/12/12 10:53 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> >OK, Waiting for the 1.8.1 tag on cordova-js then
:P
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >+1
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> I'll reiterate, my vote is to just tag 1.8.1.
In the other
> > > thread
> > > > >>we
> > > > >> >> >>did a
> > > > >> >> >> full circle on possible release types :)
> > > > >> >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> On 6/12/12 10:42 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > >> >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >Not really sure where we are with this.
Looks like there is
> > > > >>friction
> > > > >> >> >> >with updating *all* platforms to tag 1.8.1
(like the way we
> > did
> > > > >> >> >> >before). I'd say tag cordova-js 1.8.1 to
the same tag as
> > 1.8.0.
> > > > >>Then
> > > > >> >> >> >iOS updates and tags to 1.8.1. Source is
fine - but binary
> > > > >> >> >> >distribution, dunno. The reason cordova-js
has to be tagged
> > > > >>1.8.1 is
> > > > >> >> >> >because the cordova-js in a new project
will be called
> > > > >> >> >> >cordova-1.8.1.js, and if it is not tagged,
it will be
> > > confusing.
> > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Joe Bowser
<
> > > bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >> So, where are we with this?
> > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Brian
LeRoux <
> b@brian.io>
> > > > >>wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> The benefit of version numbers
to track bugs which is
> > pretty
> > > > >> useful
> > > > >> >> >>I
> > > > >> >> >> >>> think! =) I've just assumed we'd
want to synchronize the
> > > > >> cordova-js
> > > > >> >> >> >>> version number to the native code
as a rule of thumb for
> > > > >>sanity.
> > > > >> >> >> >>>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> Is that assumption incorrect?
> > > > >> >> >> >>>
> > > > >> >> >> >>>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:13 PM,
Jesse
> > > > >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> > > > >> >> >> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> > I agree with Anis, if I we
are going through your
> > proposal
> > > > >> Brian,
> > > > >> >> >> >>>there
> > > > >> >> >> >>> is
> > > > >> >> >> >>> > little to no benefit over
updating everything.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> > In my estimation, the iOS
fix will not require an
> update
> > > to
> > > > >> >> >> >>>cordova-js,
> > > > >> >> >> >>> > which may be our line in
the sand. If cordova-js need
> to
> > > be
> > > > >> >> >>rebuilt
> > > > >> >> >> >>>to
> > > > >> >> >> >>> > address an issue, then we
will probably always have
> the
> > > full
> > > > >> >> >>cascade
> > > > >> >> >> >>>of
> > > > >> >> >> >>> > rebuilds+retags+hoopla.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:06
PM, Anis KADRI <
> > > > >> anis.kadri@gmail.com
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> Is cordova-js updated
in this particular case ?
> Because
> > > if
> > > > >>it
> > > > >> is,
> > > > >> >> >> >>>the
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> platforms that use it
can just be tagged 1.8.1 and we
> > > ship
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> phonegap-1.8.1.zip (just
simpler).
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012
at 3:58 PM, Brian LeRoux <
> > > b@brian.io>
> > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > Well, here's the
proposal again.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 1. We ship a package
and it is titled
> > > phonegap-1.8.x.zip
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 2. Inside that package
we have files. Those files
> are
> > > > >> >> >>explicitly
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > *-1.8.*.* (cordova-js
would need a tag for 1.8.1
> for
> > > > >> projects
> > > > >> >> >> >>>that use
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > it..)
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 3. We update the
download with PATCH updates as
> they
> > > come
> > > > >> on a
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > platform by platform
basis (as needed).
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > This could get messy
given the shared dependency of
> > > > >> cordova-js.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > On Mon, Jun 11,
2012 at 3:47 PM, Jesse
> > > > >> >> >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > I only added
the patch level on the assumption
> that
> > > it
> > > > >> might
> > > > >> >> >> >>>happen
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> again
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > before 1.9.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > But I can live
without it.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > On Mon, Jun
11, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Brian LeRoux
> > > > >><b@brian.io
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> I'd like
to propose we take jesses suggestion
> but
> > > with
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >> >> >>>tweak
> > > > >> >> >> >>> that
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> we do not
add a new patch level. The downstream
> > > > >> distribution
> > > > >> >> >> >>>would
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> just read:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> phonegap-1.8.x.zip
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> wherein
the ios distrib would be based on 1.8.1
> > and
> > > > >>all
> > > > >> >> >>others
> > > > >> >> >> >>> based
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> on
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> 1.8.0
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> I feel
this is maintainable and easiest on
> > > > >>implementors
> > > > >> for
> > > > >> >> >> >>> platforms
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> that do
not need to rock a patch tag. Thoughts?
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> On Mon,
Jun 11, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Joe Bowser
> > > > >> >> >><bowserj@gmail.com
> > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > Android
will not be merging 1.8.1 back into
> > > master,
> > > > >> since
> > > > >> >> >>it
> > > > >> >> >> >>> will be
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> based
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > on
1.8.0 pre-CordovaWebView.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > On
Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Michael
> Brooks
> > <
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> michael@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> Hmm.. Can we have multiple tags in git
> > pointing
> > > > >>to
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >> >> >>>same
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> commit?
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> This
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> way we COULD tag all platforms, but non-ios
> > > > >> platforms'
> > > > >> >> >> >>>1.8.1
> > > > >> >> >> >>> just
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> points
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> to the same commit as 1.8.0.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
Yes, a tag is just a reference to a SHA.
> > However,
> > > > >>we
> > > > >> >> >>still
> > > > >> >> >> >>>need
> > > > >> >> >> >>> to
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> update
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
the VERSION file for each platform.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
All platforms but iOS should be able to
> branch
> > > off
> > > > >> 1.8.0,
> > > > >> >> >> >>>update
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> code,
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
and merge it back:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
- `git checkout -b 1.8.0 new-release`
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
- update the version to 1.8.1
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
- `git commit -am "Version 1.8.1"
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
- `git tag 1.8.1`
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
- `git checkout master`
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
- `git merge new-release`
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
- `git branch -d new-release`
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
- `git push origin`
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
Am I missing something?
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Filip Maj
> > > > >> >> >><fil@adobe.com>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> Hmm.. Can we have multiple tags in git
> > pointing
> > > > >>to
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >> >> >>>same
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> commit?
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> This
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> way we COULD tag all platforms, but non-ios
> > > > >> platforms'
> > > > >> >> >> >>>1.8.1
> > > > >> >> >> >>> just
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> points
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> to the same commit as 1.8.0.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> On 6/11/12 2:41 PM, "Jesse" <
> > > > >> purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >I still think we should serve the new
> > > > >> updated+package
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > distribution,
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> just
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >not modify platforms that do not have
> > changes.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >Call it a hotfix ...
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Filip Maj
> > > > >> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> The thing is that the downstream
> > > distribution
> > > > >>of
> > > > >> >> >> >>>cordova
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > (phonegap)
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
gets
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> *a lot* of exposure/downloads via a
> single
> > > > >> archive
> > > > >> >> >> >>> containing
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > all
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>platform
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> implementations.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> Tagging a 1.8.1 or 1.8.0.1 on a single
> > > > >>platform
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> >> >> >>> blogging
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > about
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> it
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> would probably work for the (small) user
> > > base
> > > > >> that
> > > > >> >> >>is
> > > > >> >> >> >>> involved
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > on
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> the
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> issue tracker+mailing list, and is
> > > comfortable
> > > > >> with
> > > > >> >> >> >>>git,
> > > > >> >> >> >>> etc.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> However
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>for
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> the vast majority of users these are all
> > > > >>"hoops"
> > > > >> >> >>they
> > > > >> >> >> >>>have
> > > > >> >> >> >>> to
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> go
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
through
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> and, in light of a latest point release
> > > > >>crashing
> > > > >> for
> > > > >> >> >> >>>them
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > already,
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> probably would just add to their
> > > frustration.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> If we want to be up front and honest
> about
> > > the
> > > > >> issue
> > > > >> >> >> >>>and
> > > > >> >> >> >>> how
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> to
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > fix
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
it,
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>as
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> well as provide as simple a solution to
> > > people
> > > > >> who
> > > > >> >> >>may
> > > > >> >> >> >>>have
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > fallen
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
into
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> the issue in the first place, I am of
> the
> > > > >> opinion we
> > > > >> >> >> >>>should
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> tag
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> 1.8.1
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> across the board, blog about it _AND_
> host
> > > up
> > > > >> >> >>another
> > > > >> >> >> >>>dist.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> Would love to hear what non-Adobe folks
> > have
> > > > >>to
> > > > >> say
> > > > >> >> >> >>>about
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> this.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> On 6/11/12 2:30 PM, "Jesse"
> > > > >> >> >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >Before I tip my hand on a vote ...
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >Is there any chance of a middle ground
> > > here?
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >Updating all platforms to 1.8.1 for the
> > > > >>benefit
> > > > >> of
> > > > >> >> >>one
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> platform
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> seems
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>like
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >a lot of overhead to address a change
> in
> > > one.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >Could we adopt packaging a 1.8.0.1.zip
> > > which
> > > > >> would
> > > > >> >> >> >>>include
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
updated
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>iOS
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >code, and iOS code tags, but no changes
> > to
> > > > >>the
> > > > >> >> >>other
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > platforms? or
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >something similar?
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >Of course this would require adding a
> > > little
> > > > >> >> >> >>> documentation to
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > the
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>release,
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >to say what was addressed, and what
> > > platforms
> > > > >> were
> > > > >> >> >> >>> changed,
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> but
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> still
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >considerably easier than the
> tag->domino
> > > > >>effect
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> >> >> >>>have
> > > > >> >> >> >>> now.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > IMO
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Filip
> > Maj
> > > > >> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> +1 release 1.8.1
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> On 6/11/12 2:15 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <
> > > > >> b@brian.io>
> > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >So we have a fairly big issue in iOS
> > 1.8
> > > > >> >> >>wherein a
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> PhoneGap
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> app is
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >crashing if the user swipes down the
> > > > >> >> >>notification
> > > > >> >> >> >>> centre
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > while
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>in-app.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >The question is whether this is a
> bug
> > > big
> > > > >> >> >>enough to
> > > > >> >> >> >>> cut an
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> 1.8.1
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >official release for all platforms
> or
> > if
> > > > >> >> >>pointing
> > > > >> >> >> >>> users to
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > the
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
minor
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >tag is enough.
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >[+1] release 1.8.1
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >[ -1] do not release 1.8.1
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >I think a tag should suffice but if
> > > > >> implementors
> > > > >> >> >> >>>have
> > > > >> >> >> >>> no
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> trouble
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >tagging a release then we might as
> > well
> > > > >>save
> > > > >> >> >> >>>Shaz/Becky
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >> >email/twitter complaint!
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >--
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >@purplecabbage
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >> >risingj.com
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >--
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >@purplecabbage
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> >risingj.com
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > --
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > @purplecabbage
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > risingj.com
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >>
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> > > > >> >> >> >>> > --
> > > > >> >> >> >>> > @purplecabbage
> > > > >> >> >> >>> > risingj.com
> > > > >> >> >> >>>
> > > > >> >> >>
> > > > >> >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Timothy Kim
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message