incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: release 1.8.1
Date Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:46:48 GMT
It is out.

-Steve

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

> I think that's it then! Thanks all
>
> On 6/13/12 10:15 AM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >WP7 has been tagged 1.8.1
> >
> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Michael Brooks
> ><michael@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote:
> >
> >> Docs are tagged. As a note - we will now need upgrade guides for 1.8.0
> >>=>
> >> 1.8.1
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Tim Kim <timkim85@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Tagged
> >> >
> >> > On 12 June 2012 15:03, Anis KADRI <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > TAGGED!
> >> > > ok let's keep doing it this way then. it's a bit overkill but it's
> >> easier
> >> > > to keep track.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Herm Wong
> >><kingoftheoaks@hotmail.com
> >> > > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > webos has been tagged 1.8.1
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > From: fil@adobe.com
> >> > > > > To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> > > > > Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:41:37 -0700
> >> > > > > Subject: Re: release 1.8.1
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Yep that was my initial suggestion
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On 6/12/12 2:32 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.kadri@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >So looks like we'll be tagging every platform to 1.8.1
> >> > > > > >What about future releases ? if an issue strikes a specific
> >> platform
> >> > > > (say
> >> > > > > >iOS or Android) should we always tag all platforms to
a new
> >> version
> >> > > > number
> >> > > > > >?
> >> > > > > >I think we should do it since we distribute everything
as a
> >>single
> >> > > > > >package.
> >> > > > > >I believe that tagging platforms separately only makes
sense
> >>if we
> >> > > > decide
> >> > > > > >to distribute them as separate packages. Thoughts ?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> iOS passes all tests and tagged 1.8.1
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Joe Bowser
> >><bowserj@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >> > Android Tagged.
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >> > All pre-1.9 work will happen on 1.8.1pre branch.
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Filip Maj
<fil@adobe.com
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> Js tagged!
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> On 6/12/12 10:53 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >OK, Waiting for the 1.8.1 tag on cordova-js
then :P
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >+1
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:49 AM,
Filip Maj
> >><fil@adobe.com>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> I'll reiterate, my vote is to
just tag 1.8.1. In the
> >>other
> >> > > > thread
> >> > > > > >>we
> >> > > > > >> >> >>did a
> >> > > > > >> >> >> full circle on possible release
types :)
> >> > > > > >> >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> On 6/12/12 10:42 AM, "Shazron"
<shazron@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >Not really sure where we
are with this. Looks like
> >>there
> >> is
> >> > > > > >>friction
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >with updating *all* platforms
to tag 1.8.1 (like the
> >>way
> >> we
> >> > > did
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >before). I'd say tag cordova-js
1.8.1 to the same tag
> >>as
> >> > > 1.8.0.
> >> > > > > >>Then
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >iOS updates and tags to 1.8.1.
Source is fine - but
> >> binary
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >distribution, dunno. The
reason cordova-js has to be
> >> tagged
> >> > > > > >>1.8.1 is
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >because the cordova-js in
a new project will be called
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >cordova-1.8.1.js, and if
it is not tagged, it will be
> >> > > > confusing.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:36
AM, Joe Bowser <
> >> > > > bowserj@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > >> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> So, where are we with
this?
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012
at 4:29 PM, Brian LeRoux <
> >> > b@brian.io>
> >> > > > > >>wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> The benefit of version
numbers to track bugs which
> >>is
> >> > > pretty
> >> > > > > >> useful
> >> > > > > >> >> >>I
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> think! =) I've just
assumed we'd want to
> >>synchronize
> >> the
> >> > > > > >> cordova-js
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> version number to
the native code as a rule of
> >>thumb
> >> for
> >> > > > > >>sanity.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> Is that assumption
incorrect?
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 11,
2012 at 4:13 PM, Jesse
> >> > > > > >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > I agree with
Anis, if I we are going through your
> >> > > proposal
> >> > > > > >> Brian,
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>there
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> is
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > little to no
benefit over updating everything.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > In my estimation,
the iOS fix will not require an
> >> > update
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>cordova-js,
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > which may be
our line in the sand. If cordova-js
> >> need
> >> > to
> >> > > > be
> >> > > > > >> >> >>rebuilt
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>to
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > address an
issue, then we will probably always
> >>have
> >> > the
> >> > > > full
> >> > > > > >> >> >>cascade
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>of
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > rebuilds+retags+hoopla.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > On Mon, Jun
11, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Anis KADRI <
> >> > > > > >> anis.kadri@gmail.com
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> Is cordova-js
updated in this particular case ?
> >> > Because
> >> > > > if
> >> > > > > >>it
> >> > > > > >> is,
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>the
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> platforms
that use it can just be tagged 1.8.1
> >>and
> >> we
> >> > > > ship
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> phonegap-1.8.1.zip
(just simpler).
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> On Mon,
Jun 11, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Brian LeRoux <
> >> > > > b@brian.io>
> >> > > > > >> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > Well,
here's the proposal again.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 1.
We ship a package and it is titled
> >> > > > phonegap-1.8.x.zip
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 2.
Inside that package we have files. Those
> >>files
> >> > are
> >> > > > > >> >> >>explicitly
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > *-1.8.*.*
(cordova-js would need a tag for
> >>1.8.1
> >> > for
> >> > > > > >> projects
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>that use
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > it..)
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 3.
We update the download with PATCH updates
> >>as
> >> > they
> >> > > > come
> >> > > > > >> on a
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > platform
by platform basis (as needed).
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > This
could get messy given the shared
> >>dependency
> >> of
> >> > > > > >> cordova-js.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > On
Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Jesse
> >> > > > > >> >> >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
I only added the patch level on the
> >>assumption
> >> > that
> >> > > > it
> >> > > > > >> might
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>happen
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> again
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
before 1.9.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
But I can live without it.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Brian
> >>LeRoux
> >> > > > > >><b@brian.io
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
I'd like to propose we take jesses
> >>suggestion
> >> > but
> >> > > > with
> >> > > > > >> the
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>tweak
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> that
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
we do not add a new patch level. The
> >> downstream
> >> > > > > >> distribution
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>would
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
just read:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
phonegap-1.8.x.zip
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
wherein the ios distrib would be based on
> >> 1.8.1
> >> > > and
> >> > > > > >>all
> >> > > > > >> >> >>others
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> based
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> on
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
1.8.0
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
I feel this is maintainable and easiest on
> >> > > > > >>implementors
> >> > > > > >> for
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> platforms
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
that do not need to rock a patch tag.
> >> Thoughts?
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Joe Bowser
> >> > > > > >> >> >><bowserj@gmail.com
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> Android will not be merging 1.8.1 back
> >>into
> >> > > > master,
> >> > > > > >> since
> >> > > > > >> >> >>it
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> will be
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
based
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> on 1.8.0 pre-CordovaWebView.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Michael
> >> > Brooks
> >> > > <
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
michael@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > Hmm.. Can we have multiple tags in git
> >> > > pointing
> >> > > > > >>to
> >> > > > > >> the
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>same
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> commit?
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
This
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > way we COULD tag all platforms, but
> >> non-ios
> >> > > > > >> platforms'
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>1.8.1
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> just
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
points
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > to the same commit as 1.8.0.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> Yes, a tag is just a reference to a SHA.
> >> > > However,
> >> > > > > >>we
> >> > > > > >> >> >>still
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>need
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> to
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
update
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> the VERSION file for each platform.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> All platforms but iOS should be able to
> >> > branch
> >> > > > off
> >> > > > > >> 1.8.0,
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>update
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
code,
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> and merge it back:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git checkout -b 1.8.0 new-release`
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - update the version to 1.8.1
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git commit -am "Version 1.8.1"
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git tag 1.8.1`
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git checkout master`
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git merge new-release`
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git branch -d new-release`
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> - `git push origin`
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> Am I missing something?
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Filip
> >>Maj
> >> > > > > >> >> >><fil@adobe.com>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > Hmm.. Can we have multiple tags in git
> >> > > pointing
> >> > > > > >>to
> >> > > > > >> the
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>same
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> commit?
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
This
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > way we COULD tag all platforms, but
> >> non-ios
> >> > > > > >> platforms'
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>1.8.1
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> just
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
points
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > to the same commit as 1.8.0.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > On 6/11/12 2:41 PM, "Jesse" <
> >> > > > > >> purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >I still think we should serve the new
> >> > > > > >> updated+package
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > distribution,
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
just
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >not modify platforms that do not have
> >> > > changes.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >Call it a hotfix ...
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:38 PM,
> >>Filip
> >> Maj
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> The thing is that the downstream
> >> > > > distribution
> >> > > > > >>of
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>cordova
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > (phonegap)
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> gets
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> *a lot* of exposure/downloads via a
> >> > single
> >> > > > > >> archive
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> containing
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > all
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>platform
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> implementations.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> Tagging a 1.8.1 or 1.8.0.1 on a
> >>single
> >> > > > > >>platform
> >> > > > > >> and
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> blogging
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > about
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
it
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> would probably work for the (small)
> >> user
> >> > > > base
> >> > > > > >> that
> >> > > > > >> >> >>is
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> involved
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > on
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
the
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> issue tracker+mailing list, and is
> >> > > > comfortable
> >> > > > > >> with
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>git,
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> etc.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
However
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>for
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> the vast majority of users these
> >>are
> >> all
> >> > > > > >>"hoops"
> >> > > > > >> >> >>they
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> to
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> go
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> through
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> and, in light of a latest point
> >> release
> >> > > > > >>crashing
> >> > > > > >> for
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>them
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > already,
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> probably would just add to their
> >> > > > frustration.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> If we want to be up front and
> >>honest
> >> > about
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > >> issue
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>and
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> how
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> to
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > fix
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> it,
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>as
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> well as provide as simple a
> >>solution
> >> to
> >> > > > people
> >> > > > > >> who
> >> > > > > >> >> >>may
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > fallen
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> into
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> the issue in the first place, I am
> >>of
> >> > the
> >> > > > > >> opinion we
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>should
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> tag
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
1.8.1
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> across the board, blog about it
> >>_AND_
> >> > host
> >> > > > up
> >> > > > > >> >> >>another
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>dist.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> Would love to hear what non-Adobe
> >> folks
> >> > > have
> >> > > > > >>to
> >> > > > > >> say
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>about
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> this.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> On 6/11/12 2:30 PM, "Jesse"
> >> > > > > >> >> >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >Before I tip my hand on a vote ...
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >Is there any chance of a middle
> >> ground
> >> > > > here?
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >Updating all platforms to 1.8.1
> >>for
> >> the
> >> > > > > >>benefit
> >> > > > > >> of
> >> > > > > >> >> >>one
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> platform
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
seems
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>like
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >a lot of overhead to address a
> >>change
> >> > in
> >> > > > one.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >Could we adopt packaging a
> >> 1.8.0.1.zip
> >> > > > which
> >> > > > > >> would
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>include
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> updated
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>iOS
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >code, and iOS code tags, but no
> >> changes
> >> > > to
> >> > > > > >>the
> >> > > > > >> >> >>other
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > platforms?
or
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >something similar?
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >Of course this would require
> >>adding a
> >> > > > little
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> documentation to
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > the
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>release,
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >to say what was addressed, and
> >>what
> >> > > > platforms
> >> > > > > >> were
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> changed,
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> but
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
still
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >considerably easier than the
> >> > tag->domino
> >> > > > > >>effect
> >> > > > > >> we
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> now.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > IMO
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:18 PM,
> >> Filip
> >> > > Maj
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> +1 release 1.8.1
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> On 6/11/12 2:15 PM, "Brian
> >>LeRoux"
> >> <
> >> > > > > >> b@brian.io>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >So we have a fairly big issue
> >>in
> >> iOS
> >> > > 1.8
> >> > > > > >> >> >>wherein a
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> PhoneGap
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
app is
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >crashing if the user swipes
> >>down
> >> the
> >> > > > > >> >> >>notification
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> centre
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > while
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>in-app.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >The question is whether this
> >>is a
> >> > bug
> >> > > > big
> >> > > > > >> >> >>enough to
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> cut an
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
1.8.1
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >official release for all
> >>platforms
> >> > or
> >> > > if
> >> > > > > >> >> >>pointing
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> users to
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > the
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> minor
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >tag is enough.
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >[+1] release 1.8.1
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >[ -1] do not release 1.8.1
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >I think a tag should suffice
> >>but
> >> if
> >> > > > > >> implementors
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> no
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
trouble
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >tagging a release then we
> >>might as
> >> > > well
> >> > > > > >>save
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>Shaz/Becky
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >email/twitter complaint!
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >--
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >@purplecabbage
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >> >risingj.com
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >--
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >@purplecabbage
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> > >risingj.com
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
--
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
@purplecabbage
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >
risingj.com
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > --
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > @purplecabbage
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > risingj.com
> >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>
> >> > > > > >> >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Timothy Kim
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >@purplecabbage
> >risingj.com
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message