incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From gtan...@gmail.com
Subject Re: XHR2 vs FIleTransfer
Date Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:10:53 GMT
Isn't that what responseBlob is for. It is there on chrome, untested so assumptions and heresay
warnings. 
Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:07:56 
To: <callback-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: XHR2 vs FIleTransfer

Yes, what about binaries?  I'm wondering how XHR2 handles that, since
it keeps being brought up.

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> What about binaries?
>
> On 6/26/12 11:01 AM, "Dan Silivestru" <dan.silivestru@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>+1
>>
>>Dan Silivestru
>>+1 (519)-589-3624
>>
>>On 2012-06-26, at 13:58, "gtanner@gmail.com" <gtanner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I would vote we should go with XHR2 and polyfill it into the platforms
>>>it isn't supported.
>>> ------Original Message------
>>> From: Joe Bowser
>>> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> ReplyTo: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: XHR2 vs FIleTransfer
>>> Sent: Jun 26, 2012 1:39 PM
>>>
>>> Hey
>>>
>>> I know that we've been debating this, but I'm wondering if we're
>>> abandoning/deprecating FileTransfer in favor for XHR2 and what the
>>> pros and cons are.  I know that I saw something about Binary Upload,
>>> and I agree that it'd be better to do that.  Also, there are numerous
>>> tickets regarding FileTransfer that people want looked at, and I'm
>>> wondering if I should prioritize them for 2.0 or if I should close
>>> them and say that XHR2 is the way of the future and that they're
>>> welcome to fork this off as a plugin.
>>>
>>> In short, what are we doing with this?
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>> Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry
>
Mime
View raw message