Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D8B0C967 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 19:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77158 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2012 19:20:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77136 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2012 19:20:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77124 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2012 19:20:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 19:20:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of raycamde@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.187] (HELO exprod6og104.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 19:20:36 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob104.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT6GI6AuZlMrHRzE7vpGdHAfhCQgMlWYs@postini.com; Wed, 02 May 2012 12:20:09 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q42JHvJ0026097 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas02.corp.adobe.com (nacas02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.100]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q42JK6Yr012611 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 12:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nambx09.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.47]) by nacas02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.100]) with mapi; Wed, 2 May 2012 12:20:05 -0700 From: Ray Camden To: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 12:20:05 -0700 Subject: RE: Cordova for desktop Thread-Topic: Cordova for desktop Thread-Index: Ac0n2RRXWHhEdZajSLOCesYSXIycXQAv1XVA Message-ID: <560DA848F5EA0249BBB0CC78B776A2C50CCFCE2C@nambx09.corp.adobe.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I think it would be a good idea. I was a big fan of the HTML/Adobe AIR mode= l (folks _do_ know that HTML was a way to build Adobe AIR desktop apps, rig= ht? It seems to be kind of a forgotten feature) as it was especially easy t= o build up quick proof of concepts and create a nice UI on simple widgets I= needed built. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Johnson [mailto:dave.c.johnson@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 3:28 PM > To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Cordova for desktop >=20 > Hi all, I just wanted to start a discussion about Cordova as a solution f= or > building desktop apps and get some ideas flowing around what people are > thinking about that. >=20 > Good idea? Bad idea? What do people think about using the OS webview vs > embedding webkit? Whatever else ... >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 > -dave