incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: tag rc monday?
Date Mon, 28 May 2012 09:10:21 GMT
iOS tagged 1.8.0rc1
(1 mobile-spec issue failure which I think is a false failure, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-831)

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:

> Filed as: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-831
>
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Becky brought up the failing spec test here (no response):
>> http://apache.markmail.org/thread/hgc7cpwoca6wl7rx
>>
>> I'm filing it as a mobile-spec issue...
>>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I tried to verify the failing test by calling the watchPosition directly
>>> -- and it wasn't working. So I tracked it down to this line:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-cordova-ios/blob/master/CordovaLib/Classes/CDVLocation.m#L362
>>>
>>> Set it to setKeepCallbackAsBool:YES and it works.... BUT the same unit
>>> test still fails for some reason.
>>>
>>> What the returnLocation function needs is a parameter to keep the
>>> callback or not, since getLocation uses this function (don't keep the
>>> callback) but watchPosition needs to keep the callback, and if I change it
>>> there might be side-effects, dunno. Sleeping on it...(at least thinking
>>> about it some more) ... it's not a trivial change by any means, but in the
>>> meantime watchPosition is broken...
>>>
>>> Shaz
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 1 test failing, trying to track it down. Pretty good! (on device - on
>>>> Simulator it fails as expected on some stuff)
>>>>
>>>> Geolocation (navigator.geolocation) watchPostition method success
>>>> callback should be called with a Position object.
>>>> TypeError: "undefined" is not a function
>>>> timeout: timed out after 20000 msec waiting for win never called
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Herm Wong <herm.wong@hotmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ran the RAT on webos and tagged webos 1.8.0rc1.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:14:21 -0700
>>>>> > Subject: Re: tag rc monday?
>>>>> > From: anis.kadri@gmail.com
>>>>> > To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Bada tagged 1.8.0rc1
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Michael Brooks <
>>>>> michael@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > Great Shazron. I've reviewed the documentation and it can be
>>>>> tagged once
>>>>> > > you've written the upgrade guide.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Michael
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > iOS is almost ready except for the Upgrade Guide, which
I will
>>>>> finish
>>>>> > > > tomorrow, then tag.
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Simon MacDonald
>>>>> > > > <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > > I pulled the latest JS into the Android repo and
tagged it to
>>>>> 1.8.0rc1.
>>>>> > > > Did
>>>>> > > > > a quick run of mobile spec and it looked okay. The
real
>>>>> testing in
>>>>> > > > earnest
>>>>> > > > > is tomorrow.
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > Simon Mac Donald
>>>>> > > > > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Jesse <
>>>>> purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > cordova-js has been tagged 1.8.0rc1
>>>>> > > > > > Please verify a new build of the js on your
platform and
>>>>> report your
>>>>> > > > > > status.
>>>>> > > > > > Pending it working okay everywhere, we can move
on to
>>>>> tagging the
>>>>> > > rest
>>>>> > > > of
>>>>> > > > > > the repos.
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > Cheers,
>>>>> > > > > >  Jesse
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Herm Wong <
>>>>> herm.wong@hotmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > FYI - Monday is a stat holiday in the US
(Memorial Day).
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:31:52 -0700
>>>>> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: tag rc monday?
>>>>> > > > > > > > From: bowserj@gmail.com
>>>>> > > > > > > > To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > So, I guess we're dropping CordovaWebView
support for
>>>>> 1.8.0?
>>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Michael
Brooks <
>>>>> > > > > > > michael@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Awesome, thanks Simon!
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Let's tag and roll out 1.8.0rc1
today!
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Michael
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:41
AM, Simon MacDonald
>>>>> > > > > > > > > <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > +1 on Android
>>>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012,
Michael Brooks wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > Great.
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > Can someone from IBM
please speak up about Android?
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > Michael
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2012
at 5:53 PM, Tim Kim <
>>>>> > > timkim85@gmail.com
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > <javascript:;>>
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > +1
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > --
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > Simon Mac Donald
>>>>> > > > > > > > > > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > --
>>>>> > > > > > @purplecabbage
>>>>> > > > > > risingj.com
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message