Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fil@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.25 as permitted sender)
From: Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
To: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org" <callback-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:11:11 -0700
Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Thread-Topic: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Thread-Index: Ac0iZtLfa8Khlwu1Ro6JQNZRr3KqEA==
Message-ID: <CBBC7309.5060%fil@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAM1AYQB1eAmsCaLqHGYjPFASpWnz2gpeHpBGX+E-WHpPCf7QZA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.120402
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Blackberry tagged! Sorry on the lateness on that one

On 4/23/12 12:04 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdonald@gmail.com> wrote:

>kk, just throwing it out there for discussion. Seems like folks would
>rather keep the "rc" tagging for now.
>
>Simon Mac Donald
>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
>On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think the only difference between an rc and a patch release is
>>whether we
>> did it before or after the end of the month. I think this does make a
>>bit
>> more sense, since you can tell people to expect bugs in the  x.x.0
>> releases.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing?
>> >
>> > On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like
>>this:
>> > >
>> > >1) tag 1.7.0
>> > >2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs
>> > >3) tag 1.7.1
>> > >4) crap one more bug
>> > >5) tag 1.7.2
>> > >6) phew, regression passed
>> > >7) Release 1.7.2!
>> > >
>> > >What do you think?
>> > >
>> > >Simon Mac Donald
>> > >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.kadri@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>>wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <herm.wong@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> From: fil@adobe.com
>> > >> > > >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
>> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> Let's tag it!
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >Hey
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably
>>tag
>> > >> 1.7.0rc1
>> > >> > > >>this
>> > >> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in
>>before
>> > >> moving
>> > >> > > >>on to
>> > >> > > >> >1.8.
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can
>>we
>> > >>just
>> > >> > > >> >increment
>> > >> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot
>>of
>> > >> > confusion.
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >Joe
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>