Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CFDB9674 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36578 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 22:47:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36559 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 22:47:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36548 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2012 22:47:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:47:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-wg0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:47:52 +0000 Received: by wgbdr12 with SMTP id dr12so2050101wgb.0 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:47:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=IsoXvt6Ko1/Lhqi+XQ33lLZjKt0THltsY8q3sQcx53U=; b=I6AN2dkWlWv0/N2hftWqSYCSBdH9v5HNGcEs0oR5NSpf3BR/apf/deIb2iixxieE6W rJSebdSelU+B6BvB0e8CAuY+tLWe3szicUYRS2FxoIymJaR7gYVrVxf37KicuCqxs9A2 HZUjQQn4xwF3Ha8ZihtNAxBXL+ou8n05S44YoZIGiKjCUJ+ib6t/fM1K48RM2Su+T8bT /lIQhxKIYkOuZ+a7z+o5yhRL96C7O0k4ugovue8MUxFKtBFdmcASffg+nHR/FIYs1Xk5 2E9ES6PHxLVKyZeFrttYBxVg+YVd3BKHYsQnQjPPltsGbpBxm/TL1otHhI1vO1R+2RkZ YXxA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.81.37 with SMTP id w5mr9629795wix.16.1334270850773; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.103.7 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:47:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:47:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.6.1 From: Joe Bowser To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428dc018345204bd832422 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04428dc018345204bd832422 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 OK, so you're proposing that we leave the thing in the common JS, even though it's not supposed to be there. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Shazron wrote: > Will rebasing lose that commit? Then, no. > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > > So, can we just rebase the head, push this out and get this rolling? > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > > > >> Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like allow edit and those ones) > >> existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left them in there as we didn't > >> want to remove without deprecation. > >> > >> If you can deal with the iOS issue without needing an API extension: > then > >> do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs need to updated too. > >> > >> Extending and changing the public API is a long and difficult process > for > >> us and will only get tougher with every platform we add support to. > >> > >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron" wrote: > >> > >> >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS parameters ones that > >> >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't know how we merge > >> >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking those out will break > >> >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation is the way to go as per > >> >http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy . We can remove this > >> >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in somehow. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > >> >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't belong in the common API. > >> >>It'd > >> >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole point of cordova-js is so > that > >> >> it's common. It'd look pretty screwed up to add this to the docs, > IMO. > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS > >> >>> > >> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > >> >>> > so what's the point of this new parameter? > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the cordova-js? I can branch 1.6.0 and > >> >>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1 > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > >> >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs for this. > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> Shaz can you comment? > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like it's intended for both > >> >>> Android > >> >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be in 1.6.1. > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip Maj > wrote: > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that myself. > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param.. sigh. We gotta stop doing > >> >>>that, > >> >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update documentation. > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param for Camera.getPicture > >> >>>yet? I > >> >>> >>>>> >didn't > >> >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now. > >> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip Maj > >> >>>wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> > > >> >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in the JS should work > >> >>>properly > >> >>> >>>>>now. > >> >>> >>>>> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake tasks in the future > and > >> >>>make > >> >>> >>>>>them > >> >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th "async" parameter to the > >> >>>task() > >> >>> >>>>> >>function > >> >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call complete() when the task is > done. > >> >>> >>>>> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> See http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor > >> >>>an > >> >>> >>>>> example. > >> >>> >>>>> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser" > wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is tagged 1.6.1. > >> >>> >>>>> >> > > >> >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Anis KADRI < > >> >>> anis.kadri@gmail.com> > >> >>> >>>>> >>wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> >> > > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1 before end of day > today > >> >>>after > >> >>> >>>>>some > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing. > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Shazron > >> >>> > >> >>> >>>>>wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version tag as well in jira... > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Shazron > >> >>> > >> >>> >>>>> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was released, I'm going to > >> >>> >>>>>"Release" > >> >>> >>>>>the > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and move outstanding issues to > >> >>>1.7.0 > >> >>> >>>>> >>version > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag. > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Filip Maj > >> >>> > >> >>> >>>>> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too. Since adding the commit > ID > >> >>>into > >> >>> >>>>>the > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default task isn't running > >> >>>properly. > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake build" and "jake test" > but > >> >>>not > >> >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> its > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it out. > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, "Shazron" > >> >>>wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging. iOS has a few commits (one > >> >>>commit > >> >>> >>>>>in > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for first thing tomorrow > for > >> >>>you > >> >>> >>>>>to > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage? > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Steven Gill > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been discovered in Cordova Android > that > >> >>> >>>>>requires > >> >>> >>>>> >>a > >> >>> >>>>> >> >>new > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out the bug on the issue > >> >>>tracker > >> >>> >>>>>at > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809# > >> >>> >>>>>co > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809 > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to just repackage 1.6.0 > with > >> >>>this > >> >>> >>>>>bug > >> >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > we > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know if people are > experiencing > >> >>>this > >> >>> >>>>>or > >> >>> >>>>> >>not. > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also had some major issues > >> >>>which he > >> >>> >>>>>has > >> >>> >>>>> >>fixed > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> now > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1 release. > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> > >> >>> >>>>> >> > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > --f46d04428dc018345204bd832422--