Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3A7A90DC for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:33:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95014 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 22:33:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94979 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 22:33:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94970 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2012 22:33:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:33:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.171] (HELO mail-wi0-f171.google.com) (209.85.212.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:33:01 +0000 Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so4455620wib.0 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:32:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lyRM6jwVsOzjVZm59e8izVRzlXv8NTq+OeQMMcHvu1k=; b=k99B4wN+CLxGGw5wkQbAvImfyRpDgQPal1Si2KaUv3azPmE5JvL5g8qW56YiwDH7fA uUw4I6OPABn8VxjosfzNXxkOrrpJ9ykoorSzzM/dfVo76xabgXhOLpgXJl6diX5mu0Ph 1efwKDP5xA/9WyX0wKITX21OvMz3cLS3fU08fex8a1rYV3uKQTPdY74gDxX5FKhDBGXV gvQNoNfwNdwiIHui/scT+GJXfyJVHWe/Zsm0MMWYZiniMXssl5p9xz/4S9o/wEg9qpiV IIz3GYh/cT/XN4nmrYrS23ahJdm90FVGSQTLV14BBpZXtpE3G7Ixqb85pICipQn3Exn1 6TIg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.81.37 with SMTP id w5mr9555616wix.16.1334269961376; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.103.7 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:32:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:32:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.6.1 From: Joe Bowser To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428dc01512aa04bd82efb7 --f46d04428dc01512aa04bd82efb7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The problem is that this parameter doesn't belong in the common API. It'd be just ignored in Android, but the whole point of cordova-js is so that it's common. It'd look pretty screwed up to add this to the docs, IMO. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron wrote: > To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > > so what's the point of this new parameter? > > > > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" wrote: > > > >>I did. Do we want to revert the cordova-js? I can branch 1.6.0 and > >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1 > >> > >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs for this. > >>> > >>> Shaz can you comment? > >>> > >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >>> > >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like it's intended for both > Android > >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be in 1.6.1. > >>>> > >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I was actually just looking at that myself. > >>>>> > >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param.. sigh. We gotta stop doing that, > >>>>> especially if we don't update documentation. > >>>>> > >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param for Camera.getPicture yet? I > >>>>> >didn't > >>>>> >notice that change until now. > >>>>> > > >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > >>>>> > > >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in the JS should work properly > >>>>>now. > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake tasks in the future and make > >>>>>them > >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th "async" parameter to the task() > >>>>> >>function > >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call complete() when the task is done. > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> See http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.js for an > >>>>> example. > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is tagged 1.6.1. > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Anis KADRI < > anis.kadri@gmail.com> > >>>>> >>wrote: > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1 before end of day today after > >>>>>some > >>>>> >> >> thorough testing. > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Shazron > >>>>>wrote: > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version tag as well in jira... > >>>>> >> >> > > >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Shazron > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was released, I'm going to > >>>>>"Release" > >>>>>the > >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and move outstanding issues to 1.7.0 > >>>>> >>version > >>>>> >> >> > > tag. > >>>>> >> >> > > > >>>>> >> >> > > > >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Filip Maj > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too. Since adding the commit ID into > >>>>>the > >>>>> >> >> packaging > >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default task isn't running properly. > >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake build" and "jake test" but not > >>>>> >>"jake" on > >>>>> >> >> its > >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it out. > >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, "Shazron" wrote: > >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging. iOS has a few commits (one commit > >>>>>in > >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for first thing tomorrow for you > >>>>>to > >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage? > >>>>> >> >> > >>> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Steven Gill > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote: > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been discovered in Cordova Android that > >>>>>requires > >>>>> >>a > >>>>> >> >>new > >>>>> >> >> > tag > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out the bug on the issue tracker > >>>>>at > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> >> >> > > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809# > >>>>>co > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809 > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to just repackage 1.6.0 with this > >>>>>bug > >>>>> >> >>fixed as > >>>>> >> >> > we > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know if people are experiencing this > >>>>>or > >>>>> >>not. > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also had some major issues which he > >>>>>has > >>>>> >>fixed > >>>>> >> >> now > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1 release. > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve > >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>>>> >> >> > > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > > > --f46d04428dc01512aa04bd82efb7--