Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01A16981D for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28968 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2012 16:12:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 28949 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2012 16:12:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 28941 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2012 16:12:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:12:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-wg0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:12:18 +0000 Received: by wgbdr12 with SMTP id dr12so864904wgb.0 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:11:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=3D9OHwz0m5V3dkY0ypLRPD2h8dHHOlThNcnIEQfEEto=; b=ark+OWO36KQMqC+7XtE0cTFFdUXMbP9gdTjFf7Pxa2GQ3SJqpGbmEXpxjkLIpOBoTR bXB4SZQUegG/Dr4mAnG4WLvSyWhKItIRx/cCKCBJUPWHjxAqcvlBRhsrVVtZz1nRillv AGyHGTp7hVTDoDkspLbPaLI3jh8HkOt/WurW8gv8N1oi3eDUEyV78cj6pbJf2RbZhl1k LLHmoTXPhMR+aqXGJ3T4lsIB+dUJTF3bTaJ0z1MQoXCA/7lDReoPrfeRW7zVSdqaadRg q9nKmtP6RwTBHy1pVEebq58HSRGsnZw84Ypv1BbERaA21xNNwcFIaf7ZoXy/bsD65f85 3Tyg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.81.37 with SMTP id w5mr17537154wix.16.1334160717822; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.103.7 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:11:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:11:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Chicken and the Egg: Proposed process for Corodova JS releases From: Joe Bowser To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428dc0a8bc0304bd697f40 --f46d04428dc0a8bc0304bd697f40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I didn't get the tag update to cordova-js, that's the issue. On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Simon MacDonald wrote: > The commit: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=3Dincubator-cordova-js.git;a=3D= commit;h=3D35f0af286f5b60f42d66a71317a68dbf33153e19 > > is the one that I did the FileWriter.seek() fix and it is the one tagged > 1.6.0. Did you grab an already existing cordova.android.js or did you > rebuild from that commit? Just trying to understand what might have gone > wrong. > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Joe Bowser wrote: > > > I don't think Automation would have helped. I grabbed the js that was o= n > > the cordova-js 1.6 tag, which is apparently broken. The only differenc= e > is > > that a script would have failed and not me. We still need to coordinat= e > > releases better. > > > > BTW where was the test that should have failed for seekTo? > > On Apr 11, 2012 8:16 AM, "Simon MacDonald" > > wrote: > > > > > I had to retag Android to 1.6.0. The .js file that Joe added into rep= o > > did > > > not have the fix for FileWriter.seek(). > > > > > > We really need to make this step part of the packaging of the release= . > If > > > we had a script that builds all the deliverables and then we go off a= nd > > > test them would be better than all of us doing our ad hoc builds. > > > > > > Simon Mac Donald > > > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Joe Bowser wrote= : > > > > > > > Retagged Android 1.6.0 > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > > > > > > > > > Docs and JS (re)tagged 1.6.0 > > > > > > > > > > On 4/10/12 12:37 PM, "Filip Maj" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Simon fixed a File API seek() issue and dropped it into cordova-= js > > > (and > > > > > >also a test into mobile spec) today. > > > > > > > > > > > >We've had varying #s of tests passing on Androids before, we > > generally > > > > had > > > > > >more tests failing on Android 2.x. Don't think this is too out o= f > > > line. > > > > > > > > > > > >DirectoryEntry timing out is a bad test to be failing on. That > > > certainly > > > > > >should be looked into. If it's an easy fix then let's get that i= n. > > > Gord > > > > > >and I tested DirectoryEntry on BB7 earlier today and it was fine= . > > > > > >DirectoryEntry was also passing fine on my Android 4.0.2. > > > > > > > > > > > >Otherwise, let's tag-n-bag!!!1 Note the issues for 1.7 and move > on! > > > > > > > > > > > >On 4/10/12 12:30 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>I don't care about contacts right now, because those are at lea= st > > > > failing > > > > > >>consistency across the four devices I'm testing. What I do car= e > > > about > > > > is > > > > > >>the fact that we're getting inconsistent tests across multiple > > > Android > > > > > >>devices. > > > > > >> > > > > > >>Samsung Galaxy S II (2.3.4): 9 Failures > > > > > >>Galaxy Nexus (4.0.2): 9 Failures > > > > > >>Motorola RAZR (2.3.5): 17 Failures > > > > > >>Samsung Nexus S (2.3.6): 23 Failures > > > > > >> > > > > > >>All these devices were factory reset before we started testing > > them, > > > > and > > > > > >>DirectoryEntry and GeoLocation tests are timing out. I'm OK wi= th > > > > tagging > > > > > >>this, but this is something that needs to be looked into, and I= 'm > > > > > >>wondering > > > > > >>if this is an issue with other platforms as well. > > > > > >> > > > > > >>Also, I believe Simon mentioned that there was something he fix= ed > > in > > > > the > > > > > >>JS > > > > > >>earlier. > > > > > >> > > > > > >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Filip Maj > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> It looks like the first contacts.save test fails because the > > > contact > > > > > >>> returned in the save success callback is the wrong one. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Looks like a native Android issue and not a JS issue. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> IMO JS and Docs can be tagged. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On 4/10/12 11:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> >OK, I'm getting 9 failures on the Samsung Galaxy S II. > Testing > > > > > >>>appears to > > > > > >>> >be completely inconsistent. I'm going to factory reset the > > Galaxy > > > > > >>>Nexus > > > > > >>> >and see if I get the same results. > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Joe Bowser < > bowserj@gmail.com > > > > > > > > >>>wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >> I'm getting the same thing on Gingerbread. The thing is > that > > on > > > > my > > > > > >>> >>Galaxy > > > > > >>> >> Nexus running 4.0.2, I'm only getting 13 failures. > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Filip Maj > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> Looks like ICS is having issues with saving a contact, bu= t > > > only a > > > > > >>> >>>couple > > > > > >>> >>> of the tests are failing in that. The round trip (heavy) > test > > > > that > > > > > >>> >>>saves, > > > > > >>> >>> searches, removes, then searches again passes.. So.. Not > > sure. > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> On 4/10/12 11:36 AM, "Joe Bowser" > wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >I'm still testing Android 2.3.6, because that's what mos= t > > > people > > > > > >>> >>>have. I > > > > > >>> >>> >do think that 21 tests is rather high for us to release, > > IMO. > > > > Why > > > > > >>> >>>did it > > > > > >>> >>> >jump up like that? > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Filip Maj < > fil@adobe.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> All manual tests pass with latest js + framework commi= t > on > > > > > >>>Android. > > > > > >>> >>>21 > > > > > >>> >>> >> failed Qunit tests. 4.0.2 Galaxy Nexus. > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> From what I can tell Shaz says iOS is good to go, Jess= e > > says > > > > the > > > > > >>> >>>same > > > > > >>> >>> >>for > > > > > >>> >>> >> WP7. I know BB and Android are good. > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> I'm going to tag the JS and update the docs with a 1.6= .0 > > > > > >>>directory, > > > > > >>> >>> then > > > > > >>> >>> >> tag the docs. > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> On 4/10/12 11:23 AM, "Filip Maj" wrote= : > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >We have not committed anything new in cordova-js, we > are > > > just > > > > > >>> >>>picking > > > > > >>> >>> a > > > > > >>> >>> >> >new commit to tag to 1.6.0, so assuming all of us hav= e > > been > > > > > >>>working > > > > > >>> >>> >>with > > > > > >>> >>> >> >the cordova-js master in our platforms, we are not > > > > introducing > > > > > >>> >>> anything > > > > > >>> >>> >> >new. > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> >Every time any cordova developer touches the common > code > > in > > > > > >>> >>>cordova-js > > > > > >>> >>> >> >that dev should be testing across all platforms. We > have > > to > > > > > >>>stop > > > > > >>> >>> >>working > > > > > >>> >>> >> >in our little native silos; that is not in the spirit > of > > > this > > > > > >>> >>>project. > > > > > >>> >>> >>We > > > > > >>> >>> >> >write a cross-platform tool, any of us need to be > > > comfortable > > > > > >>> >>>testing > > > > > >>> >>> >>on > > > > > >>> >>> >> >all supported platforms. > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> >On 4/10/12 11:05 AM, "Joe Bowser" > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>Sounds good. But if the changes somehow break Androi= d, > > > what > > > > > >>> >>>happens? > > > > > >>> >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jesse MacFadyen > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> None. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> Is none the new +1? > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> Cheers, > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> Jesse > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone5 > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> On 2012-04-10, at 11:00 AM, Shazron < > > shazron@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > None > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > 2012/4/10 Filip Maj : > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> I was gonna tag it 1.6.0.. Objections? > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> On 4/10/12 10:50 AM, "Joe Bowser" < > > bowserj@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > >>>wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Are you going to tag it 1.6.0? or 1.6.0rc3? > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >>wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> .... Already notes in docs. Durrr. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Tag? > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On 4/10/12 10:48 AM, "Filip Maj" < > fil@adobe.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Ahhh=C5=A0 actually Compass is not available= in > > > > BlackBerry > > > > > >>> >>>before > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>7.0.. So > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> that > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> would explain why it's not working on 6.0 :) > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to file an issue for that in JIRA. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to update the docs to note this, a= nd > > > then, > > > > > >>>we > > > > > >>> >>> >>should be > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> good > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> to > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tag, ya? > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/10/12 10:44 AM, "Filip Maj" < > fil@adobe.com > > > > > > > > >>>wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 37 failing tests on a Torch running 6.0. Th= e > > > accel > > > > > >>> >>>callback > > > > > >>> >>> >>test > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but when I run the manual tests for accel > they > > > all > > > > > >>>check > > > > > >>> >>> >>out, so > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>the > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 37 > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> failing tests might be a little blown up. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> The file API looks fine, Drew. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Looks to me like Compass may be a little > f'ed. > > > The > > > > > >>>manual > > > > > >>> >>> >>tests > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>for > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Compass keep returning "[object object]" so > > there > > > > > >>>seems > > > > > >>> >>>to > > > > > >>> >>> >>be a > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> little > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> mistake in there somewhere. Gord and I are > > > looking > > > > > >>>into > > > > > >>> >>> that. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> If we resolve the compass issue IMO we're > good > > to > > > > > >>>tag. We > > > > > >>> >>> >>pass > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>on > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> both a > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 9900 (runs 7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0). > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:31 AM, "Filip Maj" < > > fil@adobe.com> > > > > > >>>wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> No worries Jesse. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> I got my hands on an OS6 device so I'll tr= y > to > > > > > >>> >>>reproduce + > > > > > >>> >>> >>fix > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>what > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you're > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> seeing, Drew. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in = my > > > rush > > > > to > > > > > >>> >>>have a > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>long > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> weekend. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sorry all. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Jesse > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone5 > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android. > I'll > > > put > > > > it > > > > > >>> >>>back > > > > > >>> >>> >>when > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>we > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> get > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> this > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sorted out! > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew > > Walters > > > < > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> deedubbu@gmail.com> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm still testing on other versions of > BB. > > > > > >>>Seeing > > > > > >>> >>>some > > > > > >>> >>> >>odd > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> behavior > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> all of a sudden in File API on OS 6. N= ot > > > sure > > > > if > > > > > >>>it > > > > > >>> >>>is > > > > > >>> >>> >>my > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>test > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> app > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> or > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> real bug. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian > > > LeRoux > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj > > wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK so I pulled the latest master from > > > > > >>>cordova-js > > > > > >>> >>>and > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> integrated > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> latest master for blackberry-webworks= . > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 > tests > > > > > >>>failing. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the > rest > > > in > > > > > >>>1.7. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj" < > > > > fil@adobe.com > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree with leaving the RC tags alone= . > > Just > > > > > >>>have to > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> remove/retag > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0 > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> IMO > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron" > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >>wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's wait until BB is done and do = a > > tag > > > > > >>>reset > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>discussion? > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> with > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> take > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc1 should still be there > though I > > > > think > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, > Filip > > > Maj > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm in the process of testing the > > latest > > > > BB > > > > > >>> >>>code so > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>I'll > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> let > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> guys > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon how we're looking there. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that the last thing need before > > we're > > > > all > > > > > >>> >>>good > > > > > >>> >>> to > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>tag > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> release? > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon > MacDonald" > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should delete all the > > 1.6.0 > > > > > >>>tags. We > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>haven't > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build artifacts from 1.6.0 so the= re > > > > > >>>shouldn't > > > > > >>> >>>be a > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>problem > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> that. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I agree with Fil's steps. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simon Mac Donald > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, > > Filip > > > > Maj > > > > > >>>< > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> fil@adobe.com> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like the general process Joe > lays > > > out. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how vendoring-in a > > tagged > > > > > >>> >>>cordova.js > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>file is > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> prone > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> though, Bryce. Is it just the > manual > > > > > >>>process > > > > > >>> >>>of > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>checking > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> out > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tag in > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova-js, building, and copyin= g > > the > > > > file > > > > > >>> >>>over > > > > > >>> >>> to > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>the > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation? If this is the > > concern > > > > > >>>then > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>certainly, > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> the > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tool > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be set up to do that > > > > automatically. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason 1.6.0 tag in > > > cordova-js > > > > > >>>was > > > > > >>> >>>added > > > > > >>> >>> >>4 > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>days > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ago, > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc2 > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure > what > > > > > >>>happened > > > > > >>> >>> >>there. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In light of the tags not being > > ordered > > > > > >>> >>>properly > > > > > >>> >>> >>and > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>the > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> file > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> bug > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creeping in, I propose, just for > the > > > > 1.6.0 > > > > > >>> >>> >>release, > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>that > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> we: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in > > > > cordova-js. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the > > > latest > > > > > >>>commit > > > > > >>> >>> >>(that > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> includes > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek bug fix) - now our tags are > at > > > > least > > > > > >>>in > > > > > >>> >>>the > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>right > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> order > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) rebuild, reintegrate into > > platforms > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) unfortunately, retag the > platform > > > > > >>> >>> >>implementations > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> 1.6.0 > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If retagging is too unholy then = f > > it, > > > I > > > > > >>>say we > > > > > >>> >>> tag > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> everything > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> 1.6.1. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curti= s" > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Joe eluded to, checking > > cordova-js > > > > > >>>into > > > > > >>> >>>the > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>various > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories holds up the > release. > > > It > > > > is > > > > > >>> >>>also > > > > > >>> >>> >>error > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> prone - > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mention pushing to each > repository > > > > every > > > > > >>>time > > > > > >>> >>> >>there > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>is a > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> takes > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time & can get out of = of > > > sync. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts on having the > release > > > > build > > > > > >>> >>>script > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>handle > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this? > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> far > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as during normal development an= d > > > > testing, > > > > > >>>we > > > > > >>> >>>are > > > > > >>> >>> >>all > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova.js anyway, and keep > current > > > in > > > > > >>>our > > > > > >>> >>>own > > > > > >>> >>> >>ways. > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM= , > > > Simon > > > > > >>> >>>MacDonald > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just fixed what seems to be = a > > zero > > > > day > > > > > >>> >>>bug in > > > > > >>> >>> >>our > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> implementation > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FileWriter. If possible it wou= ld > > be > > > > good > > > > > >>>to > > > > > >>> >>>get > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>>this > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> bug > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> into > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --f46d04428dc0a8bc0304bd697f40--