Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10A0F99AA for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:01:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31291 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2012 00:01:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31271 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2012 00:01:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31262 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2012 00:01:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:01:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anis.kadri@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:57 +0000 Received: by yhjj56 with SMTP id j56so1469317yhj.6 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:00:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fTc3/rFpjonBe19GzZV80ZQYs9dVI/44uc90YdvC40g=; b=xELAS97H9NrDogotVQedkwzc1xxTUrxPa+K6SfTU46SsnE6z2EX+L2SMGwZufgj37w XprOHSEaZcq2UuEoXP9cjgvA7oOoZff/0JQBN+SyMzIpP4dwhk0YPBHaFkvzTBe18HAV USiGusIrOzeDFgMWKwdIzlvOs+7aGkxDuqZbgEhSpm0CyKU3UqpbnM7xGFRPy7HyhfZ3 NEJ6o8qm0IUzcd/whMIj/WPDx6gbBjV946nkx7V+By/WXoz69x4S4TjMdk2OT1YmOC+9 vtQs1sPdeTTpj3P0jny3vI8HBNJCR8yhczFIXfCt8a3iI0Hpyw8OsZS4ibsenjQdOHYz lsRA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.134.211 with SMTP id s59mr67376yhi.131.1334275236664; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.50.18 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:00:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:00:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.6.1 From: Anis KADRI To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303a2b738395ca04bd84299d --20cf303a2b738395ca04bd84299d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork, LICENSE/NOTICE files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I fixed all the bugs I saw. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > Android is tagged. > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse wrote: > > > Done > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > > > > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that. > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse > wrote: > > > > > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear any > > > > complaints. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > > > > > > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordova-js tag > > > > > > > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go ahead and tag > > JS > > > > > > > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse - he has commits to cordova-js > > coming, > > > > > >once those are in we can re-tag cordova-js to 1.6.1 > > > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron > wrote: > > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel* > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it does modify the > > history. > > > > We > > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it instead, since that > > would > > > be > > > > > >>>more > > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in and say "don't do > this > > > next > > > > > >>> time". I'm not that invested in it. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordova-js (somehow), it > > should > > > be > > > > > >>>> fine. cordova-ios 1.6.1 will then just be the same as 1.6.0. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip Maj > > wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new commit that changed the > common > > js > > > > > >>>>API, and > > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure this one thing out > > for > > > > > >>>>1.7? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but I am under the impression > that > > > iOS > > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said I'm quite confused. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordova-js commits to add to 1.6.1? > Although > > > > > >>>>nothing > > > > > >>>> that > > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what is built for wp7. ( ie, all > in > > > my > > > > > >>>> platform > > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder ) > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged the JS 1.6.1 too early > > anyways.. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> No - it's about a user's contribution being noted (it > > > exists), I > > > > > >>>>will > > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common code post-1.6.1 (I acknowledge > my > > > > > >>>>mistake in > > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first place). Can we branch off 1.6.0 > > then > > > > > >>>> >>> cherry-pick Fil's latest fix for 1.6.1? > > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joe Bowser < > > > bowserj@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing that we leave the thing in the > > > common > > > > > >>>>JS, > > > > > >>>> even > > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed to be there. > > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Shazron < > > shazron@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > >>>>wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing lose that commit? Then, no. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser < > > > > bowserj@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we just rebase the head, push this out and > get > > > this > > > > > >>>> >>>rolling? > > > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj < > > > fil@adobe.com> > > > > > >>>>wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like allow > > edit > > > > and > > > > > >>>>those > > > > > >>>> >>> ones) > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left them > in > > > > there > > > > > >>>>as we > > > > > >>>> >>> didn't > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want to remove without deprecation. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you can deal with the iOS issue without needing > an > > > API > > > > > >>>> >>>extension: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> then > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs need to > > > > > >>>>updated too. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending and changing the public API is a long and > > > > > >>>>difficult > > > > > >>>> >>>process > > > > > >>>> >>> >> for > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and will only get tougher with every platform we > > add > > > > > >>>>support > > > > > >>>> >>>to. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron" > > > wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS > > parameters > > > > > >>>>ones > > > > > >>>> that > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't know > > how > > > we > > > > > >>>>merge > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking those > out > > > > will > > > > > >>>>break > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation is the > > way > > > > to > > > > > >>>>go as > > > > > >>>> >>>per > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy . > > We > > > > can > > > > > >>>> remove > > > > > >>>> >>> this > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in > > somehow. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't belong > > in > > > > the > > > > > >>>> common > > > > > >>>> >>> API. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole point > of > > > > > >>>>cordova-js > > > > > >>>> >>>is > > > > > >>>> >>> so > > > > > >>>> >>> >> that > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> it's common. It'd look pretty screwed up to add > > this > > > > to > > > > > >>>>the > > > > > >>>> >>>docs, > > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > so what's the point of this new parameter? > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" < > > shazron@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the cordova-js? I > > can > > > > > >>>>branch > > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 > > > > > >>>> >>> and > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1 > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs for > > this. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Shaz can you comment? > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" < > > > > bowserj@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like > it's > > > > > >>>>intended > > > > > >>>> >>>for > > > > > >>>> >>> both > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> Android > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be in > > > 1.6.1. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip Maj < > > > > > >>>> fil@adobe.com> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that > myself. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param.. sigh. > > We > > > > > >>>>gotta > > > > > >>>> stop > > > > > >>>> >>> doing > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that, > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update > documentation. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser" > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param > for > > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet? I > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >didn't > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip > Maj > > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in the > > JS > > > > > >>>>should > > > > > >>>> >>>work > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>now. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake > > tasks > > > in > > > > > >>>>the > > > > > >>>> >>>future > > > > > >>>> >>> >> and > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>them > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th > "async" > > > > > >>>>parameter > > > > > >>>> to > > > > > >>>> >>> the > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task() > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>function > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call complete() > > > when > > > > > >>>>the > > > > > >>>> >>>task is > > > > > >>>> >>> >> done. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> See > > > > > >>>> >>> http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> example. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser" > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is tagged > > > > 1.6.1. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Anis > > > KADRI > > > > < > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> anis.kadri@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1 > > before > > > > > >>>>end of > > > > > >>>> >>>day > > > > > >>>> >>> >> today > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>some > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, > > Shazron > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version tag > > as > > > > > >>>>well in > > > > > >>>> >>> jira... > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, > > > Shazron > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was > > > released, > > > > > >>>>I'm > > > > > >>>> >>>going > > > > > >>>> >>> to > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>"Release" > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and move > > > > > >>>>outstanding > > > > > >>>> >>> issues to > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0 > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>version > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 PM, > > > Filip > > > > > >>>>Maj > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too. > Since > > > > > >>>>adding the > > > > > >>>> >>> commit > > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default > task > > > > isn't > > > > > >>>> >>>running > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake > build" > > > and > > > > > >>>>"jake > > > > > >>>> >>> test" > > > > > >>>> >>> >> but > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> its > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it > out. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, "Shazron" < > > > > > >>>> >>> shazron@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging. iOS > has a > > > few > > > > > >>>> commits > > > > > >>>> >>> (one > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>in > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for > > first > > > > > >>>>thing > > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow > > > > > >>>> >>> >> for > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>to > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage? > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 > PM, > > > > > >>>>Steven Gill > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote: > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been discovered > in > > > > > >>>>Cordova > > > > > >>>> >>> Android > > > > > >>>> >>> >> that > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>requires > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>a > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>new > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out > the > > > bug > > > > > >>>>on the > > > > > >>>> >>> issue > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>at > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809# > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>co > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809 > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to just > > > > > >>>>repackage > > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 > > > > > >>>> >>> >> with > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>bug > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > we > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know if > > > people > > > > > >>>>are > > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>or > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>not. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also had > > some > > > > > >>>>major > > > > > >>>> >>>issues > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which he > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>has > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>fixed > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> now > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1 > release. > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --20cf303a2b738395ca04bd84299d--