Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BD139655 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35168 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 22:47:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35137 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 22:47:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35129 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2012 22:47:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:47:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:47:25 +0000 Received: by iaag37 with SMTP id g37so3515834iaa.6 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:47:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nm3Gxf8tPe4CmBGWq65lqktW4MIg3lsSkbzy1DiJUQ0=; b=gdtE+EUQgBkV4s7l4Pb1ZM5IlflOpCnYffGYWTeTWad2guYrtGiFnIKTqKUSerZjSc /7d6MExYt/neyuMW9pXLy0nfyBgvrne9o7+zH3ilJCWL/Q6Yll/hC+kIG1nMDQIjoWgG GCqwyiQoGeaIU6VZjSSB608NK7f4/LQrQ7MGEuVqYPmJoK8Nmp14lWEUem9NtBVUic4Y bbyIqoyqXo7I6ab6pYnYMcePRC7qdSPWN/jZhhzcqZlorWrvTMVt16Fa4BoUoxxHjRER sve6heW8Zf33nNfU/Yk0zKuyb+gcDqmWN1XENbLU7rzAHHGc9qKtyaDgeJT+ZHaA4f3+ 2CZg== Received: by 10.42.141.72 with SMTP id n8mr3406319icu.47.1334270824374; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:47:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.146.131 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:46:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Shazron Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:46:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.6.1 To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Noted. My intent was to grab a significant user contribution (community, not just us eh) and tweak it by 1.7.0, did not expect a 1.6.1 today. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like allow edit and those ones) > existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left them in there as we didn't > want to remove without deprecation. > > If you can deal with the iOS issue without needing an API extension: then > do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs need to updated too. > > Extending and changing the public API is a long and difficult process for > us and will only get tougher with every platform we add support to. > > On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron" wrote: > >>Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS parameters ones that >>already exist in common if you noticed. Don't know how we merge >>(unmerge?) this one properly because taking those out will break >>everyone that is using it, but a deprecation is the way to go as per >>http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy . We can remove this >>new commit and I'll find a way to get this in somehow. >> >> >> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: >>> The problem is that this parameter doesn't belong in the common API. >>>It'd >>> be just ignored in Android, but the whole point of cordova-js is so tha= t >>> it's common. =A0It'd look pretty screwed up to add this to the docs, IM= O. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron wrote: >>> >>>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj wrote: >>>> > so what's the point of this new parameter? >>>> > >>>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the cordova-js? I can branch 1.6.0 and >>>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1 >>>> >> >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj wrote: >>>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs for this. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Shaz can you comment? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like it's intended for both >>>> Android >>>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be in 1.6.1. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip Maj wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that myself. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param.. =A0sigh. We gotta stop doing >>>>that, >>>> >>>>> especially if we don't update documentation. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param for Camera.getPicture >>>>yet? =A0I >>>> >>>>> >didn't >>>> >>>>> >notice that change until now. >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip Maj >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in the JS should work >>>>properly >>>> >>>>>now. >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake tasks in the future and >>>>make >>>> >>>>>them >>>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th "async" parameter to the >>>>task() >>>> >>>>> >>function >>>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call complete() when the task is done= . >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> See http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.js for >>>>an >>>> >>>>> example. >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is tagged 1.6.1. >>>> >>>>> >> > >>>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Anis KADRI < >>>> anis.kadri@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> >>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> > >>>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1 before end of day today >>>>after >>>> >>>>>some >>>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing. >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Shazron >>>> >>>> >>>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version tag as well in jira... >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Shazron >>>> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was released, I'm going to >>>> >>>>>"Release" >>>> >>>>>the >>>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and move outstanding issues to >>>>1.7.0 >>>> >>>>> >>version >>>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag. >>>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Filip Maj >>>> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too. Since adding the commit ID >>>>into >>>> >>>>>the >>>> >>>>> >> >> packaging >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default task isn't running >>>>properly. >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake build" and "jake test" but >>>>not >>>> >>>>> >>"jake" on >>>> >>>>> >> >> its >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it out. >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, "Shazron" >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging. =A0iOS has a few commits (one >>>>commit >>>> >>>>>in >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for first thing tomorrow for >>>>you >>>> >>>>>to >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage? >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Steven Gill >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been discovered in Cordova Android tha= t >>>> >>>>>requires >>>> >>>>> >>a >>>> >>>>> >> >>new >>>> >>>>> >> >> > tag >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out the bug on the issue >>>>tracker >>>> >>>>>at >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=3D132528= 09# >>>> >>>>>co >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809 >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to just repackage 1.6.0 with >>>>this >>>> >>>>>bug >>>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as >>>> >>>>> >> >> > we >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know if people are experiencing >>>>this >>>> >>>>>or >>>> >>>>> >>not. >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also had some major issues >>>>which he >>>> >>>>>has >>>> >>>>> >>fixed >>>> >>>>> >> >> now >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1 release. >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>> > >>>> >